Impact of prior BCMA-targeted therapy on CAR-T expansion and host T-cell phenotypes in patients with Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma receiving BCMA CAR-T therapy
Abstract
Abstract Background: B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy and bispecific antibodies have demonstrated therapeutic efficacy with robust response rates and improved survival in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Prior exposure to BCMA-targeted therapies has been shown to negatively impact the efficacy of subsequent BCMA-directed CAR-T cell therapy and is associated with an altered immune landscape. However, the effect of prior exposure to BCMA-targeted therapy on CAR-T expansion, self-renewing host T cell phenotypes, and their association with therapeutic efficacy in patients with RRMM receiving BCMA CAR-T have yet to be characterized. Methods From cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), we performed spectral flow cytometry with a ~40-plex panel on serial timepoints ranging from day -5 before BCMA-directed CAR-T infusion, up to month 12 post CAR-T infusion. BCMA-directed CAR were gated by staining with fluorophore-conjugated soluble BCMA antigen or a rabbit anti-camelid VHH antibody. Data was acquired on a Cytek Aurora. The BCMA CAR-Ts for RRMM were either ciltacabtagene autoleucel (ciltacel) given as standard of care, or through an investigator-initiated trial of a UCSF-manufactured BCMA-directed CAR-T for triple-class refractory MM (NCT05577000). Group 1 of collections included 10 RRMM patients receiving BCMA-directed CAR-T without prior BCMA-targeted therapy (anti-BCMA naïve group). Group 2 of collections were 3 RRMM patients receiving BCMA-directed CAR-T with prior BCMA-targeted therapy (anti-BCMA exposed group), which included idecabtagene vicleucel, belantamab mafadotin, teclistamab, and an investigational BCMA-directed bispecific T cell engager (TNB-383B, TeneoBio). Statistical comparisons between anti-BCMA naïve and anti-BCMA exposed groups were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test to evaluate differences in the frequency of CAR-T cells from total CD45+ cells and the frequency of non-CAR T cell lymphocytes expressing specific phenotypic markers. Results BCMA-directed CAR-T expansion, which was observed across patients up to day 30 in the anti-BCMA naïve group (median % CAR-T from total CD45+ events = 13.62%), was significantly diminished in the anti-BCMA exposed group (median % CAR-T from CD45+ = 0.34%, p=0.04). Diminished expansion in the anti-BCMA exposed group was seen both with ciltacabtagene autoleucel and the UCSF-manufactured CAR-T. At baseline prior to BCMA CAR-T infusion, the anti-BCMA exposed group had a significantly lower % of non-CAR CD8+ T cells compared to the anti-BCMA naïve group that were T-cell factor 1 (TCF1) positive (median 6.9% vs 36.3%, P 0.03) or C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR-4) positive (median 8.1% vs 44.9%, P 0.03). After CAR-T therapy infusion, the anti-BCMA exposed group also demonstrated a higher % of CD4+ T cells expressing granzymes B and K (median 7.3% vs 2.0%, P 0.02). Together, these findings suggest that prior exposure to BCMA-targeted therapy is associated with a depletion of host T cells with putative self-renewing capacity before CAR-T treatment, and skewing towards a more effector host T cell phenotype after CAR-T infusion. With regards to efficacy, we also observed higher baseline levels of non-CAR CXCR4+ CD8+ with best clinical response of CR/sCR compared to SD/VGPR after CAR-T therapy. Conclusions Prior BCMA-targeted therapy exposure may impact the host immune setpoint and downstream responses to subsequent BCMA-directed CAR-T therapy, including a shift from self-renewing non-CAR host T cell populations towards effector phenotypes, and impaired CAR-T expansion after CAR-T infusion. Further clinical follow up and correlative analysis to be presented will elucidate whether these immune features of prior BCMA-targeted therapy are related to clinical response and relapse.
Article Details
Authors (18)
Kevin Reyes
1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
Jodi Lipof
1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
Serena Kwek
1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
Averey Lea
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California
Matthew Clark
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California
Lisa Dunn
1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
Ruixin Sun
1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
Emily Mohler
1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
Jane Greenaway
1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
Darren Pan
1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
Anupama Kumar
1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
Alfred Chung
6University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
Peter Sayre
1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
Shagun Arora
1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
Jeffrey Lee Wolf
1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
Thomas Martin
16Department of Hematology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Ajai Chari
University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
David Oh
2UCSF, San Francisco, United States