Impact of PRF 1 A91V germline carrier status in patients with aggressive b-NHL treated with rituximab
Abstract
Abstract INTRODUCTION Rituximab mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) is an essential component of therapy in B-cell malignancies. The efficiency of cellular cytotoxicity depends on many factors including rituximab binding, lytic granule release and perforin/granzyme concentration, or expression of death-inducing ligands. Here we analysed whether selected variants in key effector molecules affect outcomes in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). METHODS PRF1 A91V (rs35947132) was genotyped in 501 patients enrolled in the RICOVER-60 trial (NCT0052936), comparing 6 versus 8 cycles of CHOP chemotherapy with or without rituximab in untreated elderly patients with aggressive B-NHL (Pfreundschuh et al., Lancet Oncol 2008). We evaluated associations with event-free, progression-free, and overall survival. The NHL-B2 (Pfreunschuh et al. Blood 2004) trial served as validation cohort for the CHOP-only arm and the interim analysis of the OPTIMAL>60 (NCT01478542) (Pfreundschuh et al., J Clin Oncol 2017) trial as validation cohort for the R-CHOP arm of the discovery RICOVER-60-cohort. RESULTS Within the RICOVER-60 trial 63 of 501 patients (13%) were carriers of the PRF1 A91V. Carriers showed significant better outcomes, with a 36-month overall survival of 81% [95% CI: 68%-95%] compared to 64% [95% CI: 57%-71%] in wildtype patients treated with CHOP alone. However, no additional benefit was observed for these carriers of PRF1 A91V by the addition of rituximab: 36-month EFS 61% [95% CI: 44%-77%] with CHOP and 63% [95% CI: 46%-81%] with R-CHOP; 36-month OS 81% [95% CI: 68%-95%] with CHOP and 73% [95% CI: 57%-89%] with R-CHOP, respectively. These results were validated in independent cohorts in aggressive B-NHL. In NHL-B2 trial the positive prognostic impact of PRF1 A91V was confirmed for CHOP-only therapy with a significantly higher 36-month OS of 87% [95% CI: 73%-100%] in PRF1 A91V carriers compared to 60% [95% CI: 54%-66%] (p=0.030) in wildtype carriers. In the interim analysis of OPTIMAL>60, where all patients received rituximab with chemotherapy, there were no significant differences between PRF1 A91V carriers and wildtype carriers in PFS (HR: 0.8 [95% CI: 0.3 - 1.9], p=0.635) or OS (HR: 0.7 [95% CI: 0.2 - 2.2], p=0.526). CONCLUSION Patients with aggressive B-NHL carrying the PRF1 A91V germline variant had a favourable outcome with CHOP only chemotherapy, but no benefit from the addition of rituximab. These results suggest PRF1 A91V as a negative predictive marker for rituximab-mediated cellular cytotoxicity in aggressive B-NHL, and it may have potential implications for other immune effector cell-based therapies.
Article Details
Authors (31)
Onur Cetin
Igor Age Kos
Evi Regitz
Moritz Bewarder
Torben Rixecker
Eugen Tausch
Division of CLL, Department of Internal Medicine III, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
Eva Schwarz
4Biophysics, Center for Integrative Physiology and Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
Johanna Jansky
4Biophysics, Center for Integrative Physiology and Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
Vadim Lesan
Claudia Schormann
Frank Neumann
Markus Loeffler
Michael Hallek
Department I of Internal Medicine, Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Kirsten Fischer
Department I of Internal Medicine, Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Sylvia Zöphel
4Biophysics, Center for Integrative Physiology and Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
Annete Staiger
7Department of Clinical Pathology, Robert Bosch Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany
German Ott
16Department of Clinical Pathology, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus and Dr Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany
Konstantinos Christofyllakis
1José Carreras Center for Immuno- and Gene Therapy and Department of Internal Medicine I, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg, Germany
Jörg Bittenbring
1José Carreras Center for Immuno- and Gene Therapy and Department of Internal Medicine I, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg, Germany
Viola Poeschel
1José Carreras Center for Immuno- and Gene Therapy and Department of Internal Medicine I, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg, Germany
Dominic Kaddu-Mulindwa
Philipp Staber
19Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Rudy Ligtvoet
1Department I of Internal Medicine and Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Düsseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Sandra Robrecht
Department I of Internal Medicine, Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Marita Ziepert
5Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
Norbert Schmitz
10Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Pneumology University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
Markus Hoth
4Biophysics, Center for Integrative Physiology and Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
Christoph Kessel
Stephan Stilgenbauer
Division of CLL, Department of Internal Medicine III, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
Bettina Altmann
5Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
Lorenz Thurner