Impact of niraparib maintenance on progression-free survival and overall survival: An updated meta-analysis.
Abstract
5591 Background: Niraparib is an oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor used as maintenance therapy in advanced ovarian cancer after platinum response. Mature OS data were lacking, so we performed an updated meta-analysis. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched from January 2023 to January 2026 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of niraparib maintenance in advanced ovarian cancer. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were pooled using random-effects models for TFST, OS, overall PFS, and subgroup PFS by BRCA, HRD status, and newly diagnosed patients. The study is registered in PROSPERO with ID CRD420261294461. Results: Four RCTs (PRIMA, NOVA, NORA, and PRIME) including 1935 patients were analysed, of whom 1,291 received niraparib, and 644 received placebo. Niraparib significantly prolonged the TFST (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.42-0.69; I²=77.6%; p<0.0001). No statistically significant improvement in OS was observed (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.82-1.08; I²=10.0%; p=0.398). Niraparib significantly improved overall PFS (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.31-0.58; I²=83.8%). PFS in BRCA-mutated patients (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.24-0.45; I²=46.0%), HRD-positive patients (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.30-0.56; I²=58.6%) (all p<0.0001). HRD-negative patients (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35-0.89; I²=52.4%), and newly diagnosed (HR 0.55 95% CI 0.39-0.80, I²=79.1%) (all p≤0.015). Conclusions: Niraparib provides durable disease-control benefits across molecular subgroups and significantly delays the need for subsequent therapy, however, mature data does not demonstrate a corresponding overall survival advantage. These findings refine patient selection and highlight the need for strategies that translate PFS gains into survival benefit. Updated meta-analysis of niraparib efficacy outcomes in advanced ovarian cancer. Study TFST (HR) Overall Survival (HR) Overall PFS (HR) PFS in BRCA mutation (HR) HRD+ PFS (HR) HRD− PFS (HR) Newly Diagnosed (HR) PRIMA 0.74 (0.62–0.89) * 1.01 (0.84–1.23) * 0.66 (0.55–0.78) * 0.43 (0.31–0.59) * 0.51 (0.40–0.66) * 0.67 (0.50–0.89) * 0.66 (0.55–0.78) * PRIME 0.45 (0.34–0.59) 0.63 (0.38–1.03) * 0.45 (0.34–0.60) 0.40 (0.23–0.68) 0.48 (0.34–0.68) 0.41 (0.22–0.75) 0.45 (0.34–0.60) NOVA (gBRCA) 0.57 (0.41–0.78) * 0.85 (0.61–1.20) * - 0.27 (0.17–0.41) 0.38 (0.24–0.60) - - NOVA (non-gBRCA) 0.58 (0.45–0.74) * 1.06 (0.81–1.37) * - - - - - NORA 0.39 (0.29–0.52) * 0.86 (0.60–1.23) * 0.32 (0.23–0.45) 0.22 (0.12–0.40) 0.22 (0.12–0.40) - - Total Result (95% CI) 0.54 (0.42 – 0.69) 0.94 (0.82–1.08) 0.42 (0.31–0.58) 0.33 (0.24–0.45) 0.41 (0.30–0.56) 0.56 (0.35–0.89) 0.55 (0.39–0.80) I² (%) 77.6 10 83.8 46 58.6 51.4 79.1 p value <0.0001 0.3979 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0146 0.0014 *Indicate updated values. TFST: time to first subsequent therapy; PFS: progression-free survival; HR: Hazard ratio; CI: confidence intervals.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (5)
Roshan Mustafa Pathan
Government Siddhartha Medical College, Vijayawada, India
Jugraj Singh
7Verde Valley Medical center, Internal Medicine, Cottonwood, United States
Ponni Gayatri Twinkle Bade
Konaseema Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Foundation, Amalapuram, India
Vamsi Krishna Kondepati
Government Medical College Ongole, Ongole, India
Mukesh Ram Kumar Kommu
Rangaraya Medical College, Kakinada, India