Impact of molecular profile and variant allele frequency in patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia undergoing allogeneic transplantation in first remission: A study by the pethema group
Abstract
Abstract Background: Prognosis and relapse risk in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) depend on factors like age, comorbidities, and notably cytogenetic and molecular alterations which are incorporated into ELN2022 risk classification. High-relapse-risk patients often undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), however post-transplant relapse remains the leading cause of mortality. Variant allele frequency (VAF) is an emerging parameter in AML that reflects the proportion of cells carrying specific mutations. Although VAF is not yet an established prognostic marker nor integrated into standard risk scores, it may provide additional information to optimize risk stratification and patient classification after allo-HSCT. This study explores the potential utility of VAF for improving relapse risk assessment in AML patients. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study by the PETHEMA working group analyzed data from the PETHEMA AML Registry, including adults (≥18 years) with AML in first complete remission who underwent allogeneic HSCT between November 2017 and February 2024. Only patients with complete molecular and outcome data were included, following ethical approval and consent. All received standard induction and consolidation therapy. Cytogenetic analyses were local, while mutational profiles were assessed via next-generation sequencing at seven Spanish reference labs using harmonized AML gene panels. Primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS) and we explored the optimal VAF cut-off point for each gene using 2-year RFS. An aggregate category of myelodysplasia-related genes (ASXL1, BCOR, EZH2, RUNX1, SF3B1, SRSF2, STAG2, U2AF1, ZRSR2) was defined, for which an optimal VAF cutoff was also identified, considering the maximum VAF of each gene. Results: A total of 717 adult patients AML were analyzed, with a median age of 56.5 years; 53.8% were male, 21.7% had secondary AML. According to the ELN 2022 classification, 14.1% had favorable risk, 31.2% intermediate risk, and 54.7% adverse risk. The most frequent mutations were DNMT3A (27.2%), FLT3-ITD (24.3%), and NPM1 (22.5%). Mutations in FLT3-ITD, NPM1, and IDH2 were associated with significantly improved OS (overall survival) and RFS. Specifically, these mutations demonstrated lower hazard ratios and many cases have not reached median survival times, reflecting better outcomes compared to wild-type. In contrast, TP53 mutations confer a poor prognosis, with markedly shorter median OS and RFS and higher risk of relapse and death. The highest median VAF among the studied genes were MPL (50%), CSF3R (47.6%) and CALR (46.7%) while the lowest median VAF were FLT3-TKD (7.1%), PTPN11 (11.9%) and NRAS (15.2%). Using the previously calculated cutoff significant RFS differences were found in DNMT3A (cutoff 49.7%, median NR vs. 12.1 months; HR 2.84 with 95% CI 1.41-5.72, P=0.0022), FLT3-TKD (cutoff 40.6%, median NR vs. 11.0 months; HR 6.83 with 95% CI 1.48-31.53, P=0.0045), U2AF1 (cutoff 43.7%, median NR vs. 18.0 months; HR 6.08 with 95% CI 1.22-30.4, P=0.0022), and WT1 (cutoff 47.5%, median NR vs. 13.6 months; HR 3.2 with 95% CI 1.25-8.19, P=0.011). No statistically significant differences were observed in OS using these cutoff points. Regarding the category of myelodysplasia-related genes, using a VAF cutoff of 45.1%, significant differences were found in RFS (median not reached, HR 1.61 [95% CI 1.07-2.44], p=0.022); no significant differences were observed in OS using this cutoff. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that not only the dichotomous presence or absence of mutations—such as FLT3-ITD—but also the VAF of these mutations plays a crucial role in determining transplant outcomes. Patients with higher or lower VAFs may experience different prognoses within the same mutational category. These results underscore the clinical value of comprehensive molecular profiling that includes VAF and highlight the potential of refined scoring models incorporating both mutation status and VAF to optimize pre- and post-transplant risk assessment and management in adult AML.
Article Details
Authors (43)
Rafael Colmenares
Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre, Madrid, Spain
Eva Barragan
Rebeca Rodriguez-Veiga
2Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain
Laura Torres-Miñana
2Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IISLAFE), Hematology, Valencia, Spain
Joaquin Sánchez-García
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain
Mar Tormo
Hospital Clinico Universitary. INCLIVA Research Institute, Valencia 46010, Spain
Teresa Bernal del Castillo
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias–Instituto Universitario del Principado de Asturias–Instituto Universitario de Oncología del Principado de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
Pilar Martinez Sanchez
Hematology Department. Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
Eduardo Rodríguez-Arbolí
Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS/CSIC), University of Seville, Seville, Spain
Cristina Gil
Hospital Alicante, alicante, Spain
Elena Soria-Saldise
6Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Instituto de Biomedicina, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
Josefina Serrano
University Hospital Reina Sofia. IMIBIC. UCO, Cordoba, Spain
Mercedes Colorado
Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
María García-Fortes
Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain
Cristina Bilbao
10Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
José Luis López Lorenzo
12Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
María José Larrayoz
Navarra University Clinic, PAMPLONA, Spain
Esther Pérez-Santaolalla
48Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain
Esperanza Lavilla-Rubira
27Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain
Lorenzo Algarra
37Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain., Hematology Department, Albacete, Spain
Maria Carmen García-Garay
16Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
Carmen Chillon
17Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, IBSAL, Salamanca, Spain
Melissa Torres-Ochando
10Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
Raimundo García-Boyero
Hospital General Universitario de Castellón, Castellón, Spain
Carmen Couto
33Hospital Nuestra Señora de Valme, Sevilla, Spain
Ágata Almela
38Hospital Universitario de León, León, Spain
Victor Noriega Concepción
40Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, La Coruña, Spain
Marta Callejas
22Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, Alcalá de Henares, Spain
Manuel Barrios García
43Hospital Universitario Regional de Málaga, Málaga, Spain
Soledad Casado
24Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain
Amaia Balerdi Malcorra
25Hospital Universitario Cruces, Barakaldo, Spain
Ana Cabello
26Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
Jorge Labrador
1Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain
María Carmen Mateos
28Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
María Luz Amigo
17Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain
Manuel Pérez-Encinas
19Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Maria Jose Garcia
46Complejo Hospitalario Torrecardenas, Almería, Spain
Lisette Costilla-Barriga
34Hospital General San Jorge, Hematology, Zaragoza, Spain
Juan Miguel Bergua Burgues
Hospital San Pedro de Alcántara. Cáceres, Caceres, Spain
Gonzalo Carreño
22Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
Joaquín Martínez-López
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre, Complutense University of Madrid, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas, Madrid Institute of Cancer, Madrid
Rosa Ayala Diaz
1Hospital 12 de Octubre, Hematología, Madrid, Spain
Pau Montesinos
Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain