Impact of low disease burden on the safety and efficacy of BCMA CAR-T in patients with Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma

K Kevin Reyes (1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States) T Tanya Jindal (1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States) S Sireesha Asoori (1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States) C Chiung-Yu Huang (1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States) D Darren Pan (1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States) A Anupama Kumar (1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States) S Shagun Arora (1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States) A Alfred Chung (6University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States) P Peter Sayre (1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States) J Jeffrey Lee Wolf (1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States) A Ajai Chari (University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States) T Thomas Martin (16Department of Hematology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) J Jodi Lipof (1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States)

Abstract

Abstract Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) have demonstrated robust responses in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Five-year follow-up data from CARTITUDE-1 revealed a 33% long-term remission rate in patients with RRMM. Lower baseline disease burden (LDB) trended toward association with long-term progression-free survival. However, the efficacy and safety profile of BCMA CAR-T in patients (pts) with LDB in a real-world setting remains uncharacterized. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all pts with RRMM who received standard of care (SOC) autologous BCMA CAR-T therapy at our institution. Demographic and disease characteristics prior to CAR-T infusion were collected. Key endpoints included minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Safety outcomes included cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector-cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), transaminitis, late neurotoxicity, immune effector cell associated enterocolitis (IEC-EC), secondary primary malignancy (SPM), neutropenia, and infections (early: <30 days; late: 30–100 days post-CART infusion). Pts were stratified by baseline disease burden at the time of lymphodepletion. LDB was defined as: serum free light chains <100 mg/L, M-protein ≤ 0.5 g/dL, bone marrow plasma cells <10%, and < 2 active extramedullary disease (EMD) sites. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared between LDB and non-LDB groups. Categorical variables were analyzed using Fisher's exact or chi-squared tests, and continuous variables were assessed with Wilcoxon rank-sum test. PFS and OS were measured from CART infusion and compared between groups using Kaplan Meier and Cox proportional hazards (cph). Multivariate cph model adjusted for R-ISS stage, prior lines of therapy (LOT), EMD, prior T-cell redirection refractoriness, and triple-class refractoriness based on clinical relevance. Results: We identified 120 pts with MM who received SOC BCMA CAR-T therapy with ciltacabtagene autoleucel (n=99) and idecabtagene vicleucel (n=21). The median age was 66 years, 68 (57%) were male, 65 (54%) had ISS stage ≥ 2, 82 (64%) had high risk cytogenetics, 75 (63%) pts had RISS stage ≥ 2, 21 (20%) had EMD, and 45 (38%) had LDB. Pts had received a median of 4 LOT (range: 1-14), 90 (75%) had prior autologous stem cell transplant, 96 (80%) were triple class refractory, and 13 (11%) were refractory to prior T-cell redirection therapy. With a median follow-up of 17 months, the 18-month PFS and OS were 74% (95% CI: 65%–84%) and 94% (95% CI: 89%–99%), respectively. MRD negativity was achieved in 89% of evaluable pts. When stratified by disease burden, pts with LDB had fewer median LOT compared to those without LDB (4 vs 5, p=0.003) and were less refractory to alkylators (11% vs 29%, p=0.013) and proteasome inhibitors (69% vs 83%, p=0.003). No significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics, including age, gender, ISS staging, R-ISS staging, high-risk cytogenetics, EMD, prior transplant, or refractoriness to other drug classes. With regards to efficacy, the LDB group had a lower risk of progression or death compared to the non-LDB group (HR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.15–1.00; p=0.05), but no differences in OS were observed. On multivariate analysis, LDB remained independently associated with improved PFS (HR 0.32 (95% CI: 0.12 – 0.88, p=0.03). In terms of safety, the LDB group had significantly lower rates of CRS (71% vs 92%, p=0.005) and transaminitis (24% vs 52%, p=0.006), with no differences in ICANS incidence. While neutropenia rates were similar, the LDB group were less likely to experience a neutropenia reoccurrence following initial neutrophil recovery (51% vs 72%, p=0.03). Infection rates were found to be higher in the non-LDB group (p=0.01), with more early infections (16% vs 11%), late infections (11% vs 5%) and both early and late infections (17% vs 11%). No significant differences were observed in late neurotoxicity, IEC-EC, and SPM. Conclusion: In this retrospective, real-world study, low disease burden was associated with improved PFS and a more favorable safety profile, including lower rates of CRS, transaminitis, neutropenia reoccurrence after initial recovery, and infections. These findings suggest that LDB may serve as an important clinical marker for predicting both enhanced efficacy and reduced toxicity of BCMA CAR-T therapy in patients with RRMM.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 2202-2202
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (13)

K

Kevin Reyes

1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States

T

Tanya Jindal

1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States

S

Sireesha Asoori

1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States

C

Chiung-Yu Huang

1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States

D

Darren Pan

1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States

A

Anupama Kumar

1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States

S

Shagun Arora

1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States

A

Alfred Chung

6University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States

P

Peter Sayre

1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States

J

Jeffrey Lee Wolf

1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States

A

Ajai Chari

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States

T

Thomas Martin

16Department of Hematology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

J

Jodi Lipof

1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States