Impact of germline vs somatic BRCA mutation status on the efficacy of rucaparib vs physician’s choice in the TRITON3 study of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

S Simon Chowdhury A Alan Haruo Bryce (Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ) K Karim Fizazi (Centre Oscar Lambret, University of Paris-Saclay, Lille, France) M M. Isabel Saez (UGCI of Medical Oncology, Hospitales Regional & Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, IBIMA, UMA, Malaga, Spain) C Charles H. Redfern (Sharp HealthCare, San Diego, CA) A Ali Benjelloun (Northeast Cancer Centre, Sudbury, ON, Canada) J John M. Burke (4Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Aurora, CO) D David Colin Campbell (Barwon Health, University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, VIC, Australia) A Aude Fléchon (Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France) Z Zafar Malik (The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, United Kingdom) A Alison Helen Reid (The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom) M Maria de Santis J Julie N. Graff (Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR) V Vadim S. Koshkin (Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine University of California‐San Francisco San Francisco California USA) A Alvaro Pinto (University Hospital La Paz, Madrid) E Elisa Fontana (Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, United Kingdom) E Eli Rosenbaum (Rabin Medical Center, Davidoff Cancer Center, Petah Tikva, Israel) C Christy Connor (pharma&, New York, NY) M Merrissa Peynado (pharma& UK Ltd, London, United Kingdom) C Charles J. Ryan (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY)

Abstract

5060 Background: Rucaparib significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) in men with BRCA-mutated chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) vs a control arm of physician’s choice of therapy (docetaxel or androgen-receptor pathway inhibitor [ARPI] therapy: abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide) in the randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 TRITON3 (NCT02975934) study. Herein, we conducted an analysis to determine the impact of germline vs somatic mutation status on the efficacy of rucaparib. Methods: Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive rucaparib 600 mg BID or physician’s choice of docetaxel or ARPI following progression while on 1 prior second-generation ARPI in any setting. The primary endpoint was rPFS. Color Health did genetic testing. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported for the BRCA subgroup. Results: In the rucaparib arm, 201/270 patients had BRCA mutations, and in the physician’s choice arm, 101/135 patients had BRCA mutations. Of patients with BRCA mutations: in the rucaparib arm, 80/201 (40%) were germline and 116/201 (58%) were somatic with 5/201 (2%) BRCA mutation status unknown, while in the physician’s choice arm, 39/101 (39%) were germline and 48/101 (48%) were somatic with 14/101 (14%) BRCA mutation status unknown. rPFS was significantly improved with rucaparib treatment vs physician’s choice in both the germline and somatic mutation groups (germline: HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.32–0.84]; somatic: HR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.25–0.59]). Incidence rates of TEAEs were similar overall between patients with germline and somatic BRCA mutations in both arms. Conclusions: Rucaparib improves progression-free survival for patients with mCRPC with either germline or somatic BRCA mutations with a manageable safety profile. These data support the use of rucaparib as a beneficial treatment option for patients with BRCA-mutated mCRPC with germline or somatic mutations. Clinical trial information: NCT02975934 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 5060-5060
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

S

Simon Chowdhury

A

Alan Haruo Bryce

Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ

K

Karim Fizazi

Centre Oscar Lambret, University of Paris-Saclay, Lille, France

M

M. Isabel Saez

UGCI of Medical Oncology, Hospitales Regional & Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, IBIMA, UMA, Malaga, Spain

C

Charles H. Redfern

Sharp HealthCare, San Diego, CA

A

Ali Benjelloun

Northeast Cancer Centre, Sudbury, ON, Canada

J

John M. Burke

4Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Aurora, CO

D

David Colin Campbell

Barwon Health, University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, VIC, Australia

A

Aude Fléchon

Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France

Z

Zafar Malik

The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, United Kingdom

A

Alison Helen Reid

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

M

Maria de Santis

J

Julie N. Graff

Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR

V

Vadim S. Koshkin

Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine University of California‐San Francisco San Francisco California USA

A

Alvaro Pinto

University Hospital La Paz, Madrid

E

Elisa Fontana

Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, United Kingdom

E

Eli Rosenbaum

Rabin Medical Center, Davidoff Cancer Center, Petah Tikva, Israel

C

Christy Connor

pharma&, New York, NY

M

Merrissa Peynado

pharma& UK Ltd, London, United Kingdom

C

Charles J. Ryan

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY