Impact of germline vs somatic BRCA mutation status on the efficacy of rucaparib vs physician’s choice in the TRITON3 study of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Abstract
5060 Background: Rucaparib significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) in men with BRCA-mutated chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) vs a control arm of physician’s choice of therapy (docetaxel or androgen-receptor pathway inhibitor [ARPI] therapy: abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide) in the randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 TRITON3 (NCT02975934) study. Herein, we conducted an analysis to determine the impact of germline vs somatic mutation status on the efficacy of rucaparib. Methods: Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive rucaparib 600 mg BID or physician’s choice of docetaxel or ARPI following progression while on 1 prior second-generation ARPI in any setting. The primary endpoint was rPFS. Color Health did genetic testing. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported for the BRCA subgroup. Results: In the rucaparib arm, 201/270 patients had BRCA mutations, and in the physician’s choice arm, 101/135 patients had BRCA mutations. Of patients with BRCA mutations: in the rucaparib arm, 80/201 (40%) were germline and 116/201 (58%) were somatic with 5/201 (2%) BRCA mutation status unknown, while in the physician’s choice arm, 39/101 (39%) were germline and 48/101 (48%) were somatic with 14/101 (14%) BRCA mutation status unknown. rPFS was significantly improved with rucaparib treatment vs physician’s choice in both the germline and somatic mutation groups (germline: HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.32–0.84]; somatic: HR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.25–0.59]). Incidence rates of TEAEs were similar overall between patients with germline and somatic BRCA mutations in both arms. Conclusions: Rucaparib improves progression-free survival for patients with mCRPC with either germline or somatic BRCA mutations with a manageable safety profile. These data support the use of rucaparib as a beneficial treatment option for patients with BRCA-mutated mCRPC with germline or somatic mutations. Clinical trial information: NCT02975934 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Simon Chowdhury
Alan Haruo Bryce
Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Karim Fizazi
Centre Oscar Lambret, University of Paris-Saclay, Lille, France
M. Isabel Saez
UGCI of Medical Oncology, Hospitales Regional & Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, IBIMA, UMA, Malaga, Spain
Charles H. Redfern
Sharp HealthCare, San Diego, CA
Ali Benjelloun
Northeast Cancer Centre, Sudbury, ON, Canada
John M. Burke
4Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Aurora, CO
David Colin Campbell
Barwon Health, University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, VIC, Australia
Aude Fléchon
Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
Zafar Malik
The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Alison Helen Reid
The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Maria de Santis
Julie N. Graff
Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
Vadim S. Koshkin
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine University of California‐San Francisco San Francisco California USA
Alvaro Pinto
University Hospital La Paz, Madrid
Elisa Fontana
Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, United Kingdom
Eli Rosenbaum
Rabin Medical Center, Davidoff Cancer Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
Christy Connor
pharma&, New York, NY
Merrissa Peynado
pharma& UK Ltd, London, United Kingdom
Charles J. Ryan
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY