Impact of germline <i>BRCA</i> status on clinical outcomes of patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer.
Abstract
559 Background: Germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 (g BRCA1/2 ) genes increase the risk for breast cancer (BC) development.The prognostic significance of gBRCA1/2 in patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2) early BC is still controversial. Methods: This cohort study derived from a prospectively-maintained institutional database of all consecutive patients with BC who underwent germline testing, including BRCA1 , BRCA2 and PALB2 , at the European Institute of Oncology (May 2002-Jan 2024). The study population comprised patients with stage I-III HR+/HER2- (estrogen receptor expression >1%) invasive BC who underwent surgery and (neo)adjuvant treatment, as endocrine therapy (ET) +/- chemotherapy (CT) (Jan 2000-Dec 2022). Primary endpoints were distant relapse-free interval (DRFI) and invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) by STEEP 2.0. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazard models were employed for survival analyses, with left-truncated models to account for the time from BC diagnosis to germline testing. Results: A total of 1,730 patients were included in the analyses, with 52 (3%) BRCA1 , 180 (10%) BRCA2 , and 9 (0.5%) PALB2 PV carriers. Compared to non-carriers, patients with gBRCA 1/2 and gPALB2 PVs were younger (median age: 39 vs 42 yrs, p<.001), had advanced disease stage (stage II-III: 71% vs 58%, p<.001), higher tumor grade (G3: 54% vs 26%, p<.001) and Ki-67 expression (median: 26% vs 20%, p<.001). Patients with gBRCA 1/2 and gPALB2 PVs were also more likely to receive neoadjuvant (13% vs 6%, p<.001) and/or adjuvant CT (56% vs 36%, p<.001) and mastectomy (56% vs 45%, p=.002). All patients received adjuvant ET, as tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor +/- GnRH analogue. No patient received adjuvant olaparib or CDK4/6 inhibitor. At a median follow-up of 9.7 (IQR 6-13.9) years, 335 (19%) patients experienced local relapse, 316 (18%) distant metastasis, and 124 (7.2%) died due to BC. At multivariate analyses, gBRCA2 P/LPVs were independently associated with shorter DRFI (HR 1.46, 95%CI 1.04–2.06, p=.028) and iDFS (HR 1.34, 95 CI 1.01–1.78, p=.045), regardless of stage, nodal status, (neo)adjuvant CT, type of surgery and adjuvant ET, whereas gBRCA1 were not. Exploratory analyses showed that among 232 gBRCA1/2 carriers, 47 (20%) and 96 (41%) were eligible for adjuvant olaparib or abemaciclib therapy per OlympiA and monarchE criteria, respectively, with 37 (16%) eligible for both therapies. Additional analyses to unravel interaction of gBRCA status with adjuvant treatment are underway. Conclusions: Patients with HR+/HER2- early BC harboring gBRCA2 PVs had a significantly increased risk of recurrence, with a potentially distinct impact of BRCA2 vs BRCA1 . Only a small proportion of this population currently qualify to adjuvant treatment escalation with targeted therapies, underscoring the need of expanding the therapeutic options in this setting.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Antonio Marra
Serena Perazzo
Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
Enzo Martino
Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
Gilda Gaudio
Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
Grazia Castellano
Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
Ambra Carnevale Schianca
Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Bianca Malagutti
Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Elisa Giordano
Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
Carmen Criscitiello
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
Paola Zagami
Mariarosaria Calvello
Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
Monica Marabelli
Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
Monica Milano
Division of Medical Senology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
Nadia Bianco
Division of Medical Senology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
Elena Guerini Rocco
Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Sara Gandini
Elisabetta Munzone
Aliana Guerrieri-Gonzaga
Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
Bernardo Bonanni
Giuseppe Curigliano