Impact of clonal hematopoiesis on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

I Isabela Diniz (Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil) F Filipe Luis Vasconcelos Visani (Oncoclínicas & Co, Salvador, Brazil) E Ellen Blanchard-Cavagis (Université Paris Cité, Paris, France) H Heloísa Carneiro Brito (Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), Joao Pessoa, Brazil) P Pedro C.A. Reis (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil) C Cainã Dabbous de Liz (Hospital Nove de Julho, Rede Américas, São Paulo, Brazil) C Caio Dabbous de Liz (Hospital Paraná, Rede Américas, Maringá, Brazil)

Abstract

e19011 Background: Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is characterized by the expansion of hematopoietic cell clones harboring somatic mutations in genes associated with hematologic malignancies and has been linked to immune dysregulation and pro-inflammatory signaling. Given the immune-dependent mechanisms of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, CH has emerged as a potential modifier of treatment response and toxicity; however, available evidence remains heterogeneous and inconclusive. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies evaluating the impact of CH on outcomes following CAR T-cell therapy. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception through June 2025 (PROSPERO: CRD420251105655). Outcomes included overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and post-treatment cytopenias. Random-effects models were used to pool risk ratios (RR) and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup analyses were conducted for lymphoma and multiple myeloma (MM). Results: Nine observational studies comprising 702 patients were included; 291 patients (41.5%) had CH. Predominant underlying malignancies were lymphoma (n = 511) and MM (n = 186). Compared to patients without CH, those with CH demonstrated higher ORR (RR 1.20; 95% CI 1.07–1.35) and CR (RR 1.24; 95% CI 1.01–1.51) following CAR T-cell therapy, without corresponding improvements in OS (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.66–1.34) or PFS (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.66–1.12). Overall, CH was not associated with increased incidence or severity of CRS (RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.95–1.24) or ICANS (RR 1.12; 95% CI 0.89–1.43), although an exploratory lymphoma-restricted analysis suggested a higher incidence of grade III–IV ICANS (RR 1.66; 95% CI 1.03–2.65). Post-treatment cytopenias were heterogeneously reported and synthesized narratively, with greater hematopoietic support requirements observed in MM cohorts. Conclusions: These findings support the safe use of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with CH and highlight the need for prospective studies to clarify mutation-specific effects and long-term outcomes.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (7)

I

Isabela Diniz

Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil

F

Filipe Luis Vasconcelos Visani

Oncoclínicas & Co, Salvador, Brazil

E

Ellen Blanchard-Cavagis

Université Paris Cité, Paris, France

H

Heloísa Carneiro Brito

Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), Joao Pessoa, Brazil

P

Pedro C.A. Reis

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil

C

Cainã Dabbous de Liz

Hospital Nove de Julho, Rede Américas, São Paulo, Brazil

C

Caio Dabbous de Liz

Hospital Paraná, Rede Américas, Maringá, Brazil