Impact of a collaborative care-based symptom intervention model on chemotherapy adherence in patients with breast cancer.

M Michael H. Storandt (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) K Kathryn Jean Ruddy (Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) V Veronica Grzegorczyk (Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) K Kurt Kroenke (Indiana University School of Medicine and Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN) M Michael J. Hassett (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) J Jacob Greenmyer (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN) S Sandra A. Mitchell (3Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD) A Ashley Wilder Smith (National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) D Deirdre R. Pachman (Division of Community Internal Medicine, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) A Andrea L. Cheville (Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN)

Abstract

1543 Background: Treatment toxicity may limit the ability of cancer patients to receive all recommended cycles of therapy. Four to six cycles of docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide (TC) is a common adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for early-stage breast cancer. We assessed the impact of routine collection of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), coupled with a collaborative care model-based symptom management intervention, on the number of cycles of TC received by patients with breast cancer. Methods: The Enhanced, EHR-facilitated Cancer Symptom Control (E2C2) trial was a cluster-randomized, pragmatic clinical trial, conducted between March 2019 and January 2023 at Mayo Clinic Rochester and within the Mayo Clinic Health System in Minnesota and Wisconsin. Patients regularly reported the severity of 6 SPPADE symptoms (Sleep deficit, Pain, Physical function impairment, Anxiety, Depression, and Energy deficit/fatigue) on 11-point numerical rating scales. Each symptom score was interpreted as none to mild (0-3), moderate (4-6), or severe (7-10). The E2C2 intervention included symptom management education modules, clinician decision support aids, and the option to discuss severe symptoms with a nurse, physical therapist, or social worker. Patients with breast cancer who received at least one cycle of TC were included in this analysis. We compared the number of cycles of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide completed by patients in the control condition versus those in the intervention condition. Results: We identified 198 patients with breast cancer who received TC during the control condition and 128 who received TC during the intervention condition. Median age was 61.3 years in the control group and 60.3 years in the intervention group, and 94% and 95% were white, respectively. Those receiving treatment during the control condition, on average, completed 3.53 cycles of docetaxel, while those receiving TC during the intervention condition completed 3.77 cycles ( p = 0.014). Seventy-eight percent in the control group completed at least 4 cycles of docetaxel, compared to 84% in the intervention group. Those receiving TC during the control condition completed an average of 3.71 cycles of cyclophosphamide, compared to 3.78 cycles in the intervention condition (p = 0.231). Eighty-four percent of patients in the control group and 86% in the intervention group completed at least 4 cycles of cyclophosphamide. Conclusions: Routine PRO surveillance, coupled with guideline-based collaborative care interventions, was associated with completion of a greater number of cycles of docetaxel. These findings suggest that routine symptom surveillance and management may enhance the docetaxel tolerance profile and improve treatment adherence in patients with early-stage breast cancer, allowing for delivery of an optimized treatment course.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 1543-1543
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (10)

M

Michael H. Storandt

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

K

Kathryn Jean Ruddy

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

V

Veronica Grzegorczyk

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

K

Kurt Kroenke

Indiana University School of Medicine and Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN

M

Michael J. Hassett

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

J

Jacob Greenmyer

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

S

Sandra A. Mitchell

3Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD

A

Ashley Wilder Smith

National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

D

Deirdre R. Pachman

Division of Community Internal Medicine, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

A

Andrea L. Cheville

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN