Immunotherapy without or with low-intensity chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for newly diagnosed b-ALL patients: A propensity score-matched study

B Bingqian Huang (1Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China) Y Yawen Wang Y Yubin Li J Jiahui Mao (1Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China) R Ruixue Wang C Chunyan Ji Y Yu Hou (State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences) Y Yan Shi M Ming Hou

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia(B-ALL) is a common malignant tumour of the blood system.With a high frequency of severe side effects and low tolerance to standard chemotherapy, some patients have a poor prognosis.Therefore,optimizing first-line treatment is critical to achieving deep remission and improving prognosis. In recent years, some data have indicated that integrating immunotherapy into first-line treatment improves remission rates, minimal residual disease(MRD) negativity rate and long-term prognosis. However, there is still a lack of relevant researches. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy without or with low-intensity chemotherapy in patients newly diagnosed with B-ALL. Methods: This retrospective study included 133 patients newly diagnosed with B-ALL. Among them, 25 patients received immunotherapy(blinatumomab or inotuzumab ozogamicin) without or with low-intensity chemotherapy (immunotherapy group) while 108 patients received standard chemotherapy(chemotherapy group). After propensity score matching (1:1), each group consisted of 8 Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) patients and 17 Philadelphia chromosome negative (Ph-) patients. All Ph+ patients received concurrent treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Low-dose chemotherapy regimens included VP, CP or VDP, whereas standard chemotherapy regimens comprised VDLP, VDCP or VDCLP. Finally, remission rates and adverse event rates were compared between two groups. Results: The MRD negative rate was significantly greater in the immunotherapy group than in the chemotherapy group (88% vs. 48%, p=0.002).Compared to the chemotherapy group, the immunotherapy group had higher minimum platelet counts (30 vs. 8×10⁹/L, p = 0.006), shorter duration of platelet counts < 50×10⁹/L (6 vs. 17 d, p = 0.015) and higher minimum neutrophil counts (0.14 vs. 0.01×10⁹/L, p = 0.000). They experienced fewer pulmonary infection(56% vs. 84%, p=0.031). In addition, red blood cell transfusions (4 vs. 8u, p=0.030) and platelet transfusions(0 vs. 80u, p=0.000)were lower in the immunotherapy group. Conclusion: Our present study demonstrates that immunotherapy without or with low-intensity chemotherapy as first-line treatment improves clinical efficacy while reducing adverse events in newly diagnosed B-ALL patients compared to standard chemotherapy.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 6870-6870
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (9)

B

Bingqian Huang

1Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China

Y

Yawen Wang

Y

Yubin Li

J

Jiahui Mao

1Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China

R

Ruixue Wang

C

Chunyan Ji

Y

Yu Hou

State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Y

Yan Shi

M

Ming Hou