Immunologic and clinical outcomes of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure in solid tumors treated with pembrolizumab.

C Charles Jeffrey Lay Tan (Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada) W Wenjiang Zhang (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada) Z Zhihui Amy Liu (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada) B Ben Wang (State Key Laboratory of Flexible Electronics (LoFE) & Institute of Advanced Materials (IAM), Nanjing University of Posts & Telecommunications, 9 Wenyuan Road, Nanjing 210023, China) G Giselle M. Boukhaled (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network) S Simone C. Stone (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada) J Jeffrey Bruce (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre) S Stephenie Prokopec (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre) A Aaron Richard Hansen (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada) P Philippe Bedard (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada) S Stephanie Lheureux A Anna Spreafico A Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada) L Lillian L. Siu (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto) E Eric Xueyu Chen (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada)

Abstract

2539 Background: Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) are two major PFAS with persistent and widespread human exposure. Epidemiologic studies in non-cancer individuals suggest PFAS-associated immune dysregulation and anti-inflammatory effects. We assessed immunologic and clinical effects of PFAS on patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors treated with pembrolizumab. Methods: In the investigator-initiated INSPIRE study (NCT02644369) (n = 106) of advanced solid cancer pts treated with pembrolizumab (head and neck squamous cell cancer, triple-negative breast cancer, high-grade serous carcinoma, melanoma and other mixed solid tumors), we quantified baseline PFOS and PFOA via HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry. PFAS were evaluated as continuous variables and dichotomized at the median ( < median vs > median; PFOS 3.6 ng/ml; PFOA 1.0 ng/ml). Associations with clinical and demographic factors were assessed using correlation/regression analyses. Association with toxicity and objective response (ORR) used Wilcoxon rank-sum tests; progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) used Cox proportional hazards models. Immune correlates (immune infiltration measured by multiplex IHC, bulk-RNA sequencing of tumor tissue and plasma cytokine levels measured by Luminex multiplex cytokine assay) were evaluated using median-split Wilcoxon comparisons with Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) control (q < 0.2). Results: Baseline PFOS and PFOA levels were moderately correlated (Pearson r = 0.49, p < 0.001). PFOS levels were significantly higher with increasing age (median age 59.4 years; range 21.1-81.8; p = 0.016). PFOA levels were significantly higher with increasing age (p = 0.001), in males (p = 0.042), and in the melanoma cohort (p = 0.015), and significantly lower in pts with prior systemic therapy (p = 0.001). For immune parameters, higher PFOA exposure was associated with reduced CD4 T-cell infiltration in tumor and stromal areas (q = 0.07). RNA sequencing of genes and immune signatures showed no associations reaching FDR significance. 10 cytokines were significantly lower in pts with high PFOA levels: IL-16, IL-2R, IL-3, HGF, IFN-γ, MCP-2/CCL8, MDC/CCL22, TNF-RII, TSLP, and BLC/CXCL13 (all q = 0.15) in ovarian cancer and melanoma pts. Neither PFOS nor PFOA levels showed significant associations with ORR, toxicity, PFS or OS. Conclusions: PFOS and PFOA levels vary by demographic and clinical factors but show no direct association with toxicity and treatment outcomes in pts treated with pembrolizumab. Elevated PFOA exposure correlates with reduced T-cell infiltration and cytokine suppression, potentially inducing systemic and local immune dysregulation. These findings highlight immunologic effects of PFAS and warrant mechanistic and longitudinal studies.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 2539-2539
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (15)

C

Charles Jeffrey Lay Tan

Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada

W

Wenjiang Zhang

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada

Z

Zhihui Amy Liu

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

B

Ben Wang

State Key Laboratory of Flexible Electronics (LoFE) & Institute of Advanced Materials (IAM), Nanjing University of Posts & Telecommunications, 9 Wenyuan Road, Nanjing 210023, China

G

Giselle M. Boukhaled

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network

S

Simone C. Stone

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada

J

Jeffrey Bruce

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

S

Stephenie Prokopec

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

A

Aaron Richard Hansen

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

P

Philippe Bedard

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada

S

Stephanie Lheureux

A

Anna Spreafico

A

Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada

L

Lillian L. Siu

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto

E

Eric Xueyu Chen

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada