Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in advanced/metastatic leiomyosarcoma (LMS): Real-world cohort from MD Anderson.
Abstract
e23545 Background: LMS is an aggressive soft-tissue sarcoma with an immunologically “cold” tumor microenvironment and historically poor responsiveness to ICB. With limited benefit from cytotoxic therapy beyond first-line and low ICB monotherapy activity, defining real-world ICB outcomes and identifying patients (pts) who may benefit remain an unmet clinical need. Methods: Adults with advanced/metastatic LMS treated with ICB at MD Anderson (2010–2025) were retrospectively identified via the pharmacy database. Response was assessed per trial RECIST v1.1 when available; otherwise, partial response/stable disease/progressive disease (PR/SD/PD) were extracted from documentation with radiology impressions. Disease control rate (DCR) was defined as PR+SD, and clinical benefit rate (CBR) as PR or SD ≥6 months (mo). Toxicity was graded per CTCAE v5. Subgroups were compared using chi-square/Fisher’s exact tests. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated by Kaplan–Meier, compared by log-rank, and evaluated with Cox regression. Results: Among 41 pts (median age 59; 76% female), 90% (n = 37) had metastatic disease at ICB start, 59% (n = 24) had ≥2 prior systemic therapy lines; 90% (n = 37) had doxorubicin; 76% (n = 31) had gemcitabine. Metastases involved lung in 83% (n = 34), liver in 66% (n = 27), and bone in 32% (n = 13). Primary sites were uterus in 29% (n = 12), retroperitoneum in 39% (n = 16), and other soft-tissue sites in 32% (n = 13). Overall, 85% (35/41) received ICB on a trial and 90% (37/41) received combination therapy: 57% (21) dual ICB, 24% (9) investigational targeted combinations, 11% (4) with concomitant radiotherapy, and 8% (3) with TKI. Best response was PR in 2 pts (5%), SD in 24 (59%), and PD in 15 (37%), yielding DCR 63% and CBR 22%. CBR differed by LMS type: 0/12 uterine LMS (uLMS) vs 9/29 (31%) for soft-tissue LMS (ST-LMS; p = 0.04) and by primary site (retroperitoneum 19% [3/16] vs other sites 46% [6/13]; Fisher’s exact p = 0.008). Median PFS was 3 mo overall and was longer with DCR vs PD (4.5 vs 1.5 mo; p < 0.001). PFS was longer with lung metastases (4.1 vs 1.3 mo; p < 0.001) and shorter with bone metastases (2.7 vs 4.1 mo; p = 0.02) and with prior gemcitabine exposure (2.8 vs 4.5 mo; p = 0.03), reflecting heavier pretreatment. In multivariable Cox regression, lung metastases (aHR 0.06; p < 0.001), bone metastases (aHR 4.8; p < 0.001), prior gemcitabine exposure (aHR 2.4; p = 0.04), and trial participation (aHR 0.2; p = 0.002; reflecting selection/regimen differences) remained independently associated with PFS. Toxicity occurred in 51%, with grade ≥3 events in 24%. Conclusions: In this real-world cohort of ICB-treated advanced LMS, trial participation and lung metastases predicted better PFS while bone metastases and prior gemcitabine exposure predicted worse PFS. ST-LMS had greater CBR than uLMS. Translational efforts are ongoing to identify LMS-specific biomarkers of ICB response.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Nassar El Assaad
Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Michael S. Nakazawa
Carlos Torrado
Ryan A. Denu
J. Andrew Livingston
Ravin Ratan
Maria Alejandra Zarzour
Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Anthony Paul Conley
Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Dejka M. Araujo
Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Vinod Ravi
Shreyaskumar Patel
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Pamela T. Soliman
Larissa Alejandra Meyer
Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Robert S. Benjamin
Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Ahsan Saleem Farooqi
Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Emily Zhi-Yun Keung
Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Christina Lynn Roland
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Alexander J. Lazar
Neeta Somaiah
Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Elise F. Nassif Haddad
Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX