Image-based classification of lymphocyte subsets from routine blood smears reveals distinct immune dynamics after CAR-T infusion

S Sean Paulsen (1Dartmouth College, Hanover, United States) G Greg Goldgof (2Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York, United States) C Chad Vanderbilt C Cesar Colorado-Jimenez (2Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York, United States) D Dylan Webb (2Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York, United States) S Sapir Israeli (1Adult Bone Marrow Transplantation Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) A Anthony Cardillo (2Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York, United States) A Ali Kamali (1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York, United States) M Maly Fenelus (2Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York, United States) S Samuel McCash (2Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York, United States) T Teng Fei (College of Life and Health Sciences, Northeastern University) L Linlin Wang L Lauren McVoy (2Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York, United States) K Kai Rejeski (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States) R Roni Shouval (1Adult Bone Marrow Transplantation Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) A Ahmet Dogan (Hematopathology Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York)

Abstract

Abstract Background Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is an established treatment for hematological malignancies, yet tools for immune monitoring remain limited. Current assays such as quantitative PCR and flow cytometry are costly and impractical for serial use. Peripheral blood smears (PBS), routinely obtained in clinical care, represent an underutilized, low-cost resource for immune monitoring. In addition to morphologic assessment, serial PBS enables longitudinal tracking of immune dynamics, potentially offering greater insight into reconstitution and toxicity than isolated timepoints. Aims: To define lymphocyte morphologies emerging after CAR-T infusion and train an AI-based platform to automate their classification. We further aimed to apply this approach to a large, multi-product cohort for longitudinal immune monitoring and correlation with clinical outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively assembled a large, multicenter dataset of patients treated with CD19- and BCMA-directed CAR-T therapies. PBS collected around the time of infusion (d-5 to 30) were digitized via Cellavision, and single lymphocyte images were extracted. A subset of cells was manually annotated by expert hematopathologists into predefined morphologic classes based on nuclear and cytoplasmic features. These annotations were used to train a convolutional neural network, which was then applied to all available cells to generate longitudinal morphologic immune profiles. Results: A training set of 1,500 lymphocytes, derived from PBS collected following CAR-T infusion (days 1–14), was manually annotated by a consensus of hematopathologists based on size, chromatin pattern, cytoplasmic features, and nuclear contour. Pathologists classified cell morphologies into five classes (morphotypes): small round lymphocytes (SRL), granular lymphocytes (GL), large granular lymphocytes (LGL), atypical basophilic lymphocytes (ABL), and disrupted cytoplasm lymphocytes (DCL). A convolutional neural network trained on these annotations reliably classified the morphotypes, achieving strong discriminative performance (AUC = 0.85). The model was then applied to 350,000 cells derived from 11,000 PBS of 543 patients treated with CD19- and BCMA-CAR-Ts (days –5 to +30 relative to infusion). We observed marked heterogeneity in morphotype dynamics over time. Prior to infusion, SRL and GL predominated, whereas ABL, DCL, and LGL emerged only post-infusion. Liso-cel and ide-cel demonstrated sustained near-peak absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) levels through day 30. To explore more granular differences between products, we first identified the median day of peak absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) for each CAR-T product, as peak ALC serves as a surrogate for CAR-T cell expansion. Using this product-specific reference day, we then collected the corresponding values of our five morphotypes for all patients. Pairwise statistical comparisons were performed across products, followed by correction for multiple testing. For example, when comparing Axicel to Lisocel, Lisocel has significantly higher ABLs (p<0.01) and lower DCLs (p<0.05). Comparing Ciltacel to Idecel, Ciltacel has significantly higher SRLs (p<0.05), GLs (p<0.005), LGLs (p<0.001), ABLs (p<0.001), and DCLs (p<0.005). To evaluate clinical utility, we modeled the trajectory of ABL proportion using a longitudinal mixed-effects framework stratified by CRS status. ABL trajectories differed significantly, with CRS patients showing a post-infusion rise peaking at day 5 followed by a sharp decline (p < 0.001). Finally, an XGBoost model integrating clinical features (age, CAR-T product) with image-derived morphologic features predicted complete response in non-Hodgkin lymphoma with a cross-validated AUC of 0.71 (±.02), indicating that morphology-informed profiling is informative for outcome prediction. Conclusions: Peripheral blood smears, a widely available and cost-effective modality, reveal distinct lymphocyte morphologies emerging after CAR-T infusion that can be reproducibly classified using deep learning. These morphologic fingerprints correlate with clinical outcomes and support the further development of PBS-based immune profiling as a scalable approach for real-time monitoring of CAR-T patients.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 4354-4354
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (16)

S

Sean Paulsen

1Dartmouth College, Hanover, United States

G

Greg Goldgof

2Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York, United States

C

Chad Vanderbilt

C

Cesar Colorado-Jimenez

2Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York, United States

D

Dylan Webb

2Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York, United States

S

Sapir Israeli

1Adult Bone Marrow Transplantation Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

A

Anthony Cardillo

2Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York, United States

A

Ali Kamali

1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York, United States

M

Maly Fenelus

2Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York, United States

S

Samuel McCash

2Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York, United States

T

Teng Fei

College of Life and Health Sciences, Northeastern University

L

Linlin Wang

L

Lauren McVoy

2Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York, United States

K

Kai Rejeski

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States

R

Roni Shouval

1Adult Bone Marrow Transplantation Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

A

Ahmet Dogan

Hematopathology Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York