Identification of a VPS29 isoform with restricted association to Retriever and Retromer accessory proteins through autoinhibition

J James L. Daly (School of Biochemistry, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Bristol) K Kai-en Chen (Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland) R Rebeka Butkovič (School of Biochemistry, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Bristol) Q Qian Guo M Michael D. Healy (Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland) E Eva Pennink (School of Biochemistry, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Bristol) G Georgia Gamble-Strutt (School of Biochemistry, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Bristol) Z Zara Higham (School of Biochemistry, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Bristol) E Edmund R. R. Moody (School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol) P Philip A. Lewis (Proteomics Facility, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bristol) K Kate J. Heesom (Proteomics Facility, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bristol) T Tom A. Williams K Kirsty J. McMillan (Department of Biochemistry, Cell and Systems Biology, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool) B Brett M. Collins (Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland) P Peter J. Cullen (School of Biochemistry, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Bristol)

Abstract

The endosomal–lysosomal network is a hub of organelles that orchestrate the dynamic sorting of hundreds of integral membrane proteins to maintain cellular homeostasis. VPS29 is a central conductor of this network through its assembly into Retromer, Retriever, and Commander endosomal sorting complexes, and its role in regulating RAB GTPase activity. Two VPS29 isoforms have been described, VPS29A and VPS29B, that differ solely in their amino-terminal sequences. Here, we identify a third VPS29 isoform, which we term VPS29C, that harbors an extended amino-terminal sequence compared to VPS29A and VPS29B. Through a combination of AlphaFold predictive modeling, in vitro complex reconstitution, mass spectrometry, and molecular cell biology, we find that the amino-terminal VPS29C extension constitutes an autoinhibitory sequence that limits access to a hydrophobic groove necessary for effector protein recruitment to Retromer, and association with Retriever and Commander. VPS29C is therefore unique in its ability to uncouple Retromer-dependent cargo sorting from the broader roles of VPS29A and VPS29B in regulating the endosomal–lysosomal network through accessory protein recruitment. Our identification and characterization of VPS29C points to additional complexity in the differential subunit assembly of Retromer, an important consideration given the increasing interest in Retromer as a potential therapeutic target in neurodegenerative diseases.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 122, Issue 27
Published July 08, 2025
ISSN 0027-8424
Publisher National Academy of Sciences

Authors (15)

J

James L. Daly

School of Biochemistry, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Bristol

K

Kai-en Chen

Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland

R

Rebeka Butkovič

School of Biochemistry, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Bristol

Q

Qian Guo

M

Michael D. Healy

Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland

E

Eva Pennink

School of Biochemistry, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Bristol

G

Georgia Gamble-Strutt

School of Biochemistry, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Bristol

Z

Zara Higham

School of Biochemistry, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Bristol

E

Edmund R. R. Moody

School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol

P

Philip A. Lewis

Proteomics Facility, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bristol

K

Kate J. Heesom

Proteomics Facility, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bristol

T

Tom A. Williams

K

Kirsty J. McMillan

Department of Biochemistry, Cell and Systems Biology, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool

B

Brett M. Collins

Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland

P

Peter J. Cullen

School of Biochemistry, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Bristol