Ibrutinib plus R-CHOP followed by maintenance in untreated ABC-DLBCL patients with IPI ≥2: A first analysis of phase II Study FIL_RI-CHOP
Abstract
Abstract Background: Patients with activated (ABC) subtype diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) exhibit inferior outcomes following R-CHOP treatment. Current evidence indicates that covalent irreversible Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) have shown higher responses in non-germinal center (non-GCB) DLBCLs compared to GCB. In untreated non-GCB DLBCLs, phase 3 PHOENIX study (Younes et al. J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37:1285-95) showed that adding ibrutinib (I) to R-CHOP (R-CHOP-I) did not improve outcomes in the intent-to-treat population. However, patients aged < 60y treated with R-CHOP-I experienced significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with those receiving R-CHOP alone. The FIL_RI-CHOP trial aims to assess whether combining R-CHOP-I, followed by ibrutinib maintenance, is safe and improves PFS in young, untreated patients with high-risk ABC DLBCL. Methods: This is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial enrolling patients aged ≥18 and <65 years with newly diagnosed ABC-DLBCL at poor prognosis (IPI ≥2). An initial R-CHOP cycle (cycle 1) was permitted as standard-of-care (step 1), to allow timely treatment initiation while a central pathology review and Cell of Origin (COO) assessment were performed. COO subtyping was determined using the NanoString's Lymphoma Subtyping (LST) gene expression signature. Patients with confirmed ABC-DLBCL (step 2) received the experimental treatment (R-CHOP + Ibrutinib 560 mg/day continuously) from cycle 2 to cycle 6, followed by two additional cycles of rituximab plus ibrutinib (cycles 7 and 8), and 18 months of ibrutinib maintenance for those achieving at least partial response post-induction. The primary endpoint is 2-year PFS. Secondary endpoints include overall response rate (ORR), complete (CRR), event-free survival (EFS), OS and safety. This preliminary analysis evaluates safety and response rate at the end of induction (EOI). Results: From July 2019 to August 2024, 279 patients were registered across 39 Fondazione Italiana linfomi (FIL) sites; 215 (76%) fulfilled eligibility criteria, were enrolled in step1, and received R-CHOP while awaiting the COO results. COO was classified as GCB in 139 of 215 patients (65%) and as ABC in 75 of 215 patients (35%), with 28/75 (37%) being double expressors. Among ABC-DLBCL cases, concordance with the Hans algorithm was 95% (71/75). All 75 ABC-DLBCLs proceeded to Step 2, and received experimental treatment. Median age was 57 years (IQR 50–60); 58.7% were male. Advanced Ann Arbor stage (III–IV) was observed in 72 of 75 patients (96%), elevated LDH levels in 58 (77.3%), involvement of ≥2 extranodal sites in 33 (44%) and IPI > 2 in 34 (46%). After 4 cycles, interim total-body CT scan showed an ORR of 90.7%, with 21.3% (16/ 75) complete responses (CR) and 69.3% (52/75) partial responses. At the EOI, assessed by PET-CT, ORR was 85.33% with a metabolic CR of 72%. A total of 64 patients initiated ibrutinib maintenance. Eleven patients (14.6%) discontinued treatment during the induction phase, prior to initiating maintenance therapy. Reasons for discontinuations were: disease progressions in 5 (6.6%), consent withdrawal in 2 (2.6%), and adverse events (AEs) in 4 (5.3%) – including 1 sudden death, 1 covid infection, 1 prolonged cytopenia and 1 gastrointestinal disorders. Neutropenia was the most common hematological toxicity (grade 3–4 per cycle: 6%; per patient: 13%), whereas febrile neutropenia was rare (≤2%). Extra-hematological AEs were primarily low-grade gastrointestinal and neurological disorders. Three cardiac events (grade 1-2) were reported; infections occurred in 24% of patients. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that central pathology review and NanoString's LST COO assessment are feasible without delaying treatment initiation. The addition of ibrutinib to R-CHOP appears feasible and effective, achieving >70% metabolic CR with a manageable safety profile in young, high-risk ABC-DLBCL patients. R-CHOP plus ibrutinib may represent a safe, effective, and potentially cost-effective treatment strategy in this population. Final results including the impact of ibrutinib maintenance will be presented at the meeting.
Article Details
Authors (36)
Alice Di Rocco
6Division of Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
Annalisa Chiappella
6Department of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
Andrea Evangelista
2Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino and CPO Piemonte, Turin, Italy
Valentina Tabanelli
5IEO, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS - Haematopathology Division, Milan, Italy
Emanuele Ravano
10Niguarda Cancer Center, Milano, Italy
Chiara Pagani
1ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Department of Hematology, Brescia, Italy
Federica Cavallo
10University of Torino, Torino, Italy
Elisa Lucchini
26Unit of Hematology, Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
Mattia Novo
9Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital and University, Torino, Italy
Attilio Guarini
Anna Merli
13UO Ematologia, Ospedale degli Infermi, Rimini, Italy
Annalisa Arcari
11Hematology Unit, Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto, Piacenza, Italy
Michele Cimminiello
15UO Ematologia, AOR Ospedale delle Croci, Potenza, Italy
Francesco Merli
19Department of Hematology, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
Elsa Pennese
13Unità Operativa Semplice Dipartimentale Centro Diagnosi e Terapia Linfomi, Presidio Ospedaliero Pescara, Pescara, Italy
Manuela Zanni
3AOU SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, SCDU of Hematology, Alessandria, Italy
Donato Mannina
27Hematology Unit, Papardo Hospital Messina, Messina, Italy
Ausilia Gorgone
20UOC Ematologia ARNAS Garibaldi, Catania, Italy
Guido Gini
23Hematology, Ospedai riunint delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
Anna Mele
7Azienda Ospedaliera Cardinale Giovanni Panico, Tricase, Italy
Jacopo Olivieri
9Azienda Ospedaliera di Udine, Udine, Italy
Michele Spina
Centro di Riferimento Oncologico IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
Monica Tani
14Hematology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, “Santa Maria delle Croci” Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
Andrés José María Ferreri
19IUniversity Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milano, Italy Strategic Program on Lymphomas, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy, Milan, Italy
Chiara Ghiggi
Stefan Hohaus
14Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
Marta Coscia
15Division of Hematology, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi ASST Sette Laghi, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
Sara Galimberti
14Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
Arcangelo Liso
32University of Perugia, Hematology, Perugia, Italy
Mariella Lo Schirico
34Oncoematologia, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
Benedetta Puccini
10Department of Haematology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
Sara Usai
34AO Brotzu - Ospedale Oncologico Businco, Unit of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant, Cagliari, Italy
Claudia Peracchio
37Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL), ETS, Alessandria, Italy
Alessandra Dondi
38Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL), ETS, Modena, Italy
Umberto Vitolo
Candiolo Cancer Institute
Maurizio Martelli
12Hematology Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy