Ibrutinib enhances 41BB-costimulated CART19 function and persistence through immune reprogramming: Insights from the phase 3 ECOG-ACRIN E1912 clinical Trial

T Truc Huynh (2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States) V Victoria Wang J Jennifer Feigin (2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States) E Elizabeth Siegler (2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States) B Brooke Kimball (2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States) C Carli Stewart (2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States) K Kun Yun (2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States) L Long Mai (2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States) C Claudia Manriquez Roman (2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States) H Hong Xia R R. Leo Sakemura (2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States) I Ismail Can (2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States) O Omar Gutierrez Ruiz (2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States) E Ekene Ogbodo (2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States) O Olivia Sirpilla (2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States) G Grace DeFranco (1Mayo Clinic, Department of Immunology, Rochester, United States) S Sophia Goldberg (1Mayo Clinic, Department of Immunology, Rochester, United States) A Ateka Saleh (2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States) D Dominic Skeele (2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States) S Sara Foote (1Mayo Clinic, Department of Immunology, Rochester, United States) Y Yoh Yamaguchi (1Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology, Rochester, United States) L Lionel Kankeu Fonkoua (2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering, Rochester, United States) M Mehrdad Hefazi Torghabeh (2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States) S Sameer Parikh (1Mayo Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester, United States) V Vitoria Cantinho Pereira (10King's College London, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, London, United Kingdom) P Paul Buckley (10King's College London, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, London, United Kingdom) A Alan Ramsay T Tait Shanafelt (1Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA) N Neil Kay (1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States) S Saad Kenderian (1Mayo Clinic, Department of Immunology, Rochester, United States)

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is marked by impaired T cell responses that limit the efficacy of immunotherapies. CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CART19) received FDA approval to treat CLL in 2024. However, itsefficacy in CLL patients remains low, with durable remission rate of ~20%. Ibrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has shown synergy with CART19 in preclinical and early clinical studies. We aimed to study the impact of ibrutinib on CART19 utilizing clinical samples from the pivotal clinical trial E1912 (NCT02048813) of ibrutinib/rituximab (IR) vs fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR). This trial led to the FDA approval of first line ibrutinib in CLL. Methods: We generated CART19 incorporating either CD28 (28ζ) or 41BB (BBζ) costimulatory domains from T cells isolated from patients with CLL treated with IR or FCR on the E1912 trial. IR samples were collected at baseline (pretreatment), 6- or 12-months during treatment, or at progression. FCR samples were collected at baseline, 15-18 months during treatment, or at progression. For animal experiments, NOD-SCID-γ-/- (NSG) mice were intravenously (i.v.) engrafted with 1×10⁶ luciferase⁺ CD19⁺ JeKo-1 cells. Upon tumor establishment (~10⁸ photons/sec by bioluminescence imaging), mice were randomized and treated i.v. with 1×10⁶ 28ζ or BBζ derived from longitudinal IR- or FCR-treated patient samples. To further assess the impact of prolonged ibrutinib exposure on CART19 function, we chronically stimulated healthy donor-derived 28ζ or BBζ in vitro for 22 days with JeKo-1 cells and 100nM ibrutinib or vehicle control and then tested CART19 functions. Finally, we performed single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) of longitudinal patient T cell samples treated with IR. Results: Ex vivo T cell expansion was significantly enhanced following IR compared to FCR. BBζ generated from IR-treated patients after 6 months of ibrutinib exhibited enhanced in vitro expansion (p=0.016) and antigen-specific proliferation (p=0.038) in the presence of JeKo-1 cells. This corresponded with significantly improved antitumor efficacy and prolonged survival in vivo compared to cells generated at disease progression (p=0.017). In contrast, 28ζ showed no significant differences in efficacy across IR studied treatment timepoints. BBζ from FCR-treated patients did not show differences in tumor control based on treatment timepoints but demonstrated shorter survival compared to BBζ from IR-treated patients. 28ζ from FCR-treated patients generated at disease progression demonstrated significantly reduced tumor control and shorter survival compared to 28ζ produced at baseline (p=0.0002), indicating detrimental effects of FCR treatment on the therapeutic potential of CART products. To further investigate the impact of prolonged ibrutinib exposure, we utilized in vitro models of CART exhaustion. We found that, after repeated antigen stimulation with JeKo-1 cells, ibrutinib-treated BBζ had significantly increased antigen-specific degranulation (p=0.005), and cytokine production (IL-2, p=0.045; TNF-α, p=0.003; IFN-γ, p=0.001), compared to BBζ treated with vehicle control. In contrast, 28ζ did not show improved degranulation or cytokine production in cocultures with ibrutinib. Prolonged ibrutinib exposure led to downregulation of FOXO3, a transcription factor associated with T cell exhaustion which has been shown to cause dysfunction specifically in BBζ. These results further indicate that ibrutinib may be more beneficial to BBζ. Indeed, scRNAseq revealed that after ≥ 6 months of ibrutinib, T cells showed downregulation of inflammatory, oxidative stress, and apoptosis pathways, paralleled by modest activation of MYC and E2F targets. However, at disease progression, T cells under ibrutinib treatment displayed marked upregulation of interferon signaling, inflammation responses, and stress-related programs, indicating a shift toward immune reactivation or dysfunction.Conclusion: Our study shows that BBζ, but not 28ζ, generated 6 months during ibrutinib treatment has superior antitumor activity and persistence compared to similar later timepoints or FCR-treated counterparts. Prolonged ibrutinib exposure enhances BBζ function by modulating stress and apoptotic pathways. These findings highlight the importance of pre-CART treatment timing and support ibrutinib as a potential enhancer of CART cell fitness in CLL.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 2101-2101
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (30)

T

Truc Huynh

2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States

V

Victoria Wang

J

Jennifer Feigin

2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States

E

Elizabeth Siegler

2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States

B

Brooke Kimball

2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States

C

Carli Stewart

2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States

K

Kun Yun

2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States

L

Long Mai

2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States

C

Claudia Manriquez Roman

2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States

H

Hong Xia

R

R. Leo Sakemura

2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States

I

Ismail Can

2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States

O

Omar Gutierrez Ruiz

2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States

E

Ekene Ogbodo

2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States

O

Olivia Sirpilla

2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States

G

Grace DeFranco

1Mayo Clinic, Department of Immunology, Rochester, United States

S

Sophia Goldberg

1Mayo Clinic, Department of Immunology, Rochester, United States

A

Ateka Saleh

2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States

D

Dominic Skeele

2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States

S

Sara Foote

1Mayo Clinic, Department of Immunology, Rochester, United States

Y

Yoh Yamaguchi

1Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology, Rochester, United States

L

Lionel Kankeu Fonkoua

2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering, Rochester, United States

M

Mehrdad Hefazi Torghabeh

2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States

S

Sameer Parikh

1Mayo Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester, United States

V

Vitoria Cantinho Pereira

10King's College London, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, London, United Kingdom

P

Paul Buckley

10King's College London, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, London, United Kingdom

A

Alan Ramsay

T

Tait Shanafelt

1Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA

N

Neil Kay

1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States

S

Saad Kenderian

1Mayo Clinic, Department of Immunology, Rochester, United States