HRS-1167 (M9466), a PARP1 inhibitor, combined with abiraterone acetate and prednisone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A phase 1b/2 study.
Abstract
5036 Background: PARP inhibitors combined with novel hormonal agents (NHAs) have shown improved progression-free survival in metastatic prostate cancer compared to NHA alone. HRS-1167 (M9466) is a novel highly selective PARP1 inhibitor with established antitumor activity in advanced solid tumors. This multicenter, open-label, dose-finding and efficacy expansion phase 1b/2 study assessed the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of HRS-1167 combined with AA-P in mCRPC (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06689163). Methods: Chinese adult mCRPC patients with homologous recombination repair mutations who were previously treated were enrolled. Eligible patients received oral HRS-1167 at 30 mg QD or 50 mg QD, combined with AA-P (abiraterone acetate 300 mg QD; prednisone 5 mg BID). Primary objectives were safety and tolerability. Results: As of Oct 31, 2025, 58 patients were enrolled and treated (HRS-1167 30 mg, n = 33; HRS-1167 50 mg, n = 25; prior NHA, 100%; BRCA mutation, 44.8%). Median follow-up was 3.0 months and 6.2 months in the 30 mg and 50 mg cohorts. Preliminary efficacy was summarized in the Table. Among patients with evaluable efficacy (n = 47), prostate-specific antigen response (PSA50) rate was 36.4% (8/22) in the 30 mg cohort and 52.0% (13/25) in the 50 mg cohort. Confirmed objective response rate (cORR) was 37.5% and 14.3%, and disease control rate (DCR) was 81.8% and 92.0%, respectively. HRS-1167 plus AA-P demonstrated particularly encouraging efficacy in patients with BRCA mutations: PSA50 rate was 100% (6/6) in the 30 mg cohort and 81.8% (9/11) in the 50 mg cohort, and cORR was 100% (2/2) and 33.3% (1/3), respectively. DCR was 100% in the BRCA -mutated subgroup. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 26 (78.8%) and 25 (100%) patients in the 30 mg and 50 mg cohorts (grade ≥3, 18.2% and 44.0%; serious, 9.1% and 32.0%). There were no TEAEs leading to death. The most common (≥5% of patients) grade ≥3 TEAEs were hematologic toxicities (anemia, 9.1% and 24.0%; decreased platelet count, 6.1% and 8.0%; decreased white blood cell count, 0% and 12.0%; decreased neutrophil count, 3.0% and 8.0%). Conclusions: HRS-1167 combined with AA-P showed promising efficacy in patients with mCRPC, especially those with BRCA mutations. The combination was well-tolerated with no new safety signals identified. Clinical trial information: NCT06689163 . Overall BRCA m 30 mg (N = 22) 50 mg (N = 25) 30 mg (N = 6) 50 mg (N = 11) PSA50, n (%) 8 (36.4) 13 (52.0) 6 (100) 9 (81.8) Time to PSA progression, months, median (95% CI) NR (3.7, NR) 6.5 (5.5, NR) NR (4.6, NR) 6.5 (3.8, NR) cORR, n/N* (%) 3/8 (37.5) 1/7 (14.3) 2/2 (100) 1/3 (33.3) DCR, n (%) 18 (81.8) 23 (92.0) 6 (100) 11 (100) N = efficacy evaluable patients; N* = patients with target lesions at baseline. PSA and tumor responses were confirmed. PSA, prostate-specific antigen; cORR, confirmed objective response rate; DCR, disease control rate; NR, not reached.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Chaochao Liang
The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
Shusuan Jiang
Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China
Tao Dai
Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering
Sheng Tai
The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
Mingxin Zhang
State Key Laboratory of Quantum Functional Materials, School of Physical Science and Technology
Aili Zhang
Yong Tang
Ensem Therapeutics, Inc., 200 Boston Ave., Medford, Massachusetts 02155, United States
Hongqian Guo
Hui Chen
Tianyu Li
Xudong Zhu
Qun Tian
Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
Junyong Dai
Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
Xiaopeng Hu
State Key Laboratory of Low-Dimensional Quantum Physics, Department of Physics, Tsinghua University
Ziling Liu
First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
Wei Chen
Jun Xiao
Bnagmin Han
Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China
Yuting Wang
Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Dapeng Zhang