Hospital outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumors and atrial-fibrillation/flutter.

K Krishna Doshi (1UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, United States) N Nandhini Iyer (8MacNeal Hospital, Loyola University Health System, Berwyn, United States) S Sripada Preetham Kasire (Jacobi Medical Center/North Central Bronx, NYC Health and Hospitals, Bronx, NY) S Sandeep Guntuku (Mamata Medical College, Hyderabad, India) E Edward James (Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, IL)

Abstract

e23066 Background: Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs) are rare, aggressive malignancies that often metastasize widely and can cause significant complications, including cardiac involvement. Atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia that may arise in patients with NETs due to hormone-mediated valvular dysfunction, systemic inflammation, or hemodynamic changes. Despite the growing prevalence of NETs and their associated cardiovascular complications, limited data exists on the clinical impact of AF in this population. Understanding how AF affects hospital outcomes is critical to inform treatment strategies and improve prognosis. This study evaluates in-hospital outcomes, including mortality, length of stay, and healthcare costs, in patients with NETs and AF. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the 2019–2021 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Patients with neuroendocrine tumors and atrial fibrillation/flutter were identified using ICD-10-CM codes. Primary and secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, length of stay, hospital charges, stroke, and heart failure. Statistical analyses included t-tests, chi-square tests, and multivariable logistic regression to compare outcomes. Results: This study analyzed data from 110,445 patients with neuroendocrine tumors, of whom 16,510 (14.94%) had AF. Patients with AF were significantly older (mean age 72.7 years) compared to those without AF (mean age 63.2 years) (p < 0.001). The prevalence of AF was higher in males (58.21%) than females (41.79%) (p < 0.001) and was more common in White patients (81.89%) compared to Black (10.09%) and Hispanic (4.20%) patients (p < 0.001). AF was also associated with lower median household income (p = 0.02), residence in the South region (p = 0.02), treatment at larger hospitals (p = 0.005), and urban teaching hospital settings (p < 0.001). Patients with AF were more likely to have Medicare (76.22%) and less likely to have private insurance (16.39%) (p < 0.001). Critically, AF was associated with a significantly higher mortality rate (9.87% vs. 5.4%; adjusted OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.51-2.01; p < 0.001), a longer length of stay (7.6 vs. 6.4 days; p < 0.001), and higher total cost of hospitalization (105,868 vs. 88,750; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our findings highlight the substantial impact of atrial fibrillation/flutter on patients with neuroendocrine tumors. AF in this population is associated with significantly worse in-hospital outcomes, including higher mortality, prolonged hospital stays, and increased healthcare costs. These findings underscore the importance of early recognition and aggressive management of AF in patients with NETs.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (5)

K

Krishna Doshi

1UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, United States

N

Nandhini Iyer

8MacNeal Hospital, Loyola University Health System, Berwyn, United States

S

Sripada Preetham Kasire

Jacobi Medical Center/North Central Bronx, NYC Health and Hospitals, Bronx, NY

S

Sandeep Guntuku

Mamata Medical College, Hyderabad, India

E

Edward James

Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, IL