HER2 expression dynamics and prognostic significance in the treatment of gastric cancer.

M Min Lai L Liying Zhao (Engineering Research Center of Organosilicon Compounds and Materials (Ministry of Education), Hubei Key Lab on Organic and Polymeric OptoElectronic Materials, College of Chemistry and Molecular Sciences, The Institute for Advanced Studies, TaiKang Center for Life and Medical Sciences, and State Key Laboratory of Metabolism and Regulation in Complex Organisms) L Li Guoxin (Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University; Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Beijing, China) H Huayuan Liang Z Zhiwei Li K Kaihua Huang X Xiao Yan (Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics) H Huimin Zhang R Rou Zhong (Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China) Q Qing Xie X Xinru Liu (Soil Biogeochemistry Laboratory, Environmental Engineering Institute, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL))

Abstract

4025 Background: The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression undergoes changes during the treatment of gastric cancer. This study aims to evaluate post-treatment HER2 expression changes and the impact on survival. Methods: From a prospectively maintained database, we extracted clinical and pathological data, treatment information, and survival outcomes of gastric cancer patients (pts) with paired pre- and post-treatment HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) results (2018-2024). Cohen’s Kappa was used to assess HER2 expression concordance. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with HER2 change, while the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression were used for survival analysis. Results: 274 gastric cancer pts with paired HER2 IHC results were enrolled, including IHC 0 (67.5%, 185/274), 1+ (14.6%, 40/274), 2+ (13.5%, 37/274), 3+ (4.4%, 12/274) before treatment and IHC 0 (63.8%, 175/274), 1+ (21.9%, 60/274), 2+ (11.7%, 32/274), and 3+ (2.6%, 7/274) after treatment. The overall HER2 change rate was 42.7% (21.5% HER2 expression increased, 21.2% decreased), indicating low concordance (Kappa = 0.179, p < 0.001). Among 7.6% (17/225) of pts with HER2 changes from 0/1+ to 2+/3+, 23.5% (4/17) received anti-HER2 therapy (trastuzumab or anti-HER2 ADCs), achieving a 75.0% response rate. 38.5% (5/13) of initially confirmed HER2-positive pts (IHC 3+/2+ and FISH+) exhibited loss of HER2 positivity after treatment. 3 of 8 initially HER2-negative pts who converted to HER2-positive received trastuzumab for metastatic diseases, achieving a 66.7% response rate. Based on efficacy evaluation on the second HER2 testing, 197 pts were classified into the PR/SD group and 77 into the PD group, with comparable HER2 changes rate (41.6% vs. 45.5%, p = 0.565). Anti-HER2 therapy (n = 28) was associated with a higher HER2 changes rate (67.9% vs. 39.8%, p = 0.005), mainly driven by HER2 reduction (60.7% vs. 16.7%, p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression showed that combined immunotherapy (OR [odds ratio] 1.85, p = 0.028) or targeted immunotherapy (OR 4.71, p < 0.001) was associated with a higher HER2 change rate than chemotherapy alone. The median follow-up time was 31.2 months. HER2 expression changes were associated with worse PFS (HR [hazard ratio] 1.52, p = 0.040) and OS (HR 1.51, p = 0.043), with decreased HER2 expression showing the poorest PFS (Log-rank p = 0.030) and OS (Log-rank p = 0.025). Subgroup analysis showed in PR/SD group, HER2 expression changes was associated with significantly worse PFS (HR 2.48, p = 0.003) and OS (HR 2.56, p = 0.002), while no survival differences were observed in PD group. Conclusions: HER2 expression frequently changes during the treatment of gastric cancer, particularly after immunotherapy and targeted therapy, and is associated with worse survival outcomes. Dynamic HER2 testing contributes to guiding precision therapy for gastric cancer.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 4025-4025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (11)

M

Min Lai

L

Liying Zhao

Engineering Research Center of Organosilicon Compounds and Materials (Ministry of Education), Hubei Key Lab on Organic and Polymeric OptoElectronic Materials, College of Chemistry and Molecular Sciences, The Institute for Advanced Studies, TaiKang Center for Life and Medical Sciences, and State Key Laboratory of Metabolism and Regulation in Complex Organisms

L

Li Guoxin

Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University; Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Beijing, China

H

Huayuan Liang

Z

Zhiwei Li

K

Kaihua Huang

X

Xiao Yan

Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics

H

Huimin Zhang

R

Rou Zhong

Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Q

Qing Xie

X

Xinru Liu

Soil Biogeochemistry Laboratory, Environmental Engineering Institute, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL)