Hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet (HALP) score as a prognostic indicator in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy.

J J. Everett Knudsen (Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA) A Anosh Dadabhoy (Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA) M Mazyar Zahir C Chirag Doshi (Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA) M Michael Basin (Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA) D Domenique Escobar (University of Southern California Institute of Urology Los Angeles California USA) G Gus Miranda (Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA) J Jie Cai (National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center of MPTES in High Energy and Safety LIBs, Engineering Research Center of MTEES (Ministry of Education), Research Center of BMET (Guangdong Province), and Key Lab. of ETESPG(GHEI), School of Chemistry) S Siamak Daneshmand (Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center)

Abstract

852 Background: Prognosis in cancer patients is a combination of tumor characteristics and immunobiology. While a variety of hemogram parameters have been examined, HALP scores have demonstrated some of the most significant prognostic value across multiple cancers. In this study, we examine the prognostic value of HALP scores in patients with bladder cancer (BCa) undergoing radical cystectomy (RC). Methods: Using our prospective, IRB-approved cystectomy database, we identified patients who underwent RC between 2007 and 2024. Patients with incomplete CBC and CMP data were excluded. Patients were stratified into four quartiles (Q1-Q4, Q1 as reference). Associations of HALP scores with overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were assessed with multivariate Cox regression models. Results: The cohort included 1,098 patients who had CBC and CMP data within 60 days prior to RC, and HALP scores were calculated using the formula Hb×Alb×(#AbsLymph÷Pt) (demographics in Table 1). Of note, patients in HALP Q1 and Q2 had significantly more 30- and 90-day complications (p=0.02, p=0.01) and had more severe 90-day complications (p=0.02) compared to higher HALP quartiles (Clavien-Dindo classification). Patients in HALP Q3 and Q4 had improved OS (HR=0.575, p=0.0004; HR=0.673, p=0.01) as compared to Q1 quartile. Additionally, patients in HALP Q3 had improved RFS (HR=0.648, p=0.01). Conclusions: HALP scores are a significant marker for predicting postoperative complications and OSl in patients undergoing RC for BCa. HALP scores could be used for further risk stratification and for optimizing overall fitness before surgery. Demographic distribution of HALP cohort. Characteristics Q1 (N=274) Q2 (N=274) Q3 (N=275) Q4 (N=275) p-value Age, n (%) ≤65 yrs. >65 yrs. 73 (26.6)201 (73.4) 79 (28.8)95 (71.2) 82 (29.8)193 (70.2) 106 (38.5)169 (61.5) 0.01 Sex, n (%) M F 203 (74.1)71 (25.9) 214 (78.1)60 (21.9) 237 (86.2)38 (13.8) 243 (88.4)32 (11.6) <0.001 Charleson Comorbidity Index, n (%) 0 1 ≥2 48 (17.5)61 (22.3)165 (60.2) 59 (21.5)78 (28.5)137 (50.0) 62 (22.5)86 (31.3)127 (46.2) 60 (21.8)63 (22.9)152 (55.3) 0.03 Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, n (%) Y N 112 (40.9)162 (59.1) 114 (41.6)160 (58.4) 192 (69.8)83 (30.2) 68 (24.7)207 (75.3) <0.001 Pathological staging, n (%) Organ confined (< (y)pT2N0) Extravesical (> (y)pT2N0) Lymph node positive (pN+) 138 (50.4)51 (18.6)85 (31.0) 174 (63.5)40 (14.6)60 (21.9) 172 (62.5)43 (15.6)60 (21.8) 204 (74.2)34 (12.4)37 (13.5) <0.001 Complications, n (%) 30-day Y N 90-day Y N 181 (66.1)93 (33.9)7216 (8.8)58 (21.2) 160 (58.4)114 (41.8)193 (70.4)81 (29.6) 160 (58.2)115 (41.8)191 (69.5)84 (30.5) 146 (53.1)129 (46.9)180 (65.5)95 (34.5) 0.02 0.01 Severity of 90-day complications, n (%) None I-II III-V 67 (24.5)149 (54.4)58 (21.2) 90 (32.8)123 (44.9)61 (22.3) 93 (33.8)140 (50.9)42 (15.3) 99 (36.0)133 (48.4)43 (15.6) 0.02

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 7_suppl
Published March 01, 2026
Pages 852-852
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (9)

J

J. Everett Knudsen

Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA

A

Anosh Dadabhoy

Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA

M

Mazyar Zahir

C

Chirag Doshi

Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA

M

Michael Basin

Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA

D

Domenique Escobar

University of Southern California Institute of Urology Los Angeles California USA

G

Gus Miranda

Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA

J

Jie Cai

National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center of MPTES in High Energy and Safety LIBs, Engineering Research Center of MTEES (Ministry of Education), Research Center of BMET (Guangdong Province), and Key Lab. of ETESPG(GHEI), School of Chemistry

S

Siamak Daneshmand

Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center