Hematology-oncology bootcamp: Educational impact of an interactive, guideline-based “101” curriculum.
Abstract
9035 Background: Hematology-oncology is a rapidly evolving field, and incoming fellows often face early gaps in foundational knowledge during the transition from internal medicine. Mastery of core principles and guideline-based care is required before complex trial interpretation, yet traditional one-way didactic models may be insufficient. To address this, we implemented a structured, longitudinal bootcamp of ASCO- and ASH-aligned sessions delivered through interactive educational formats for fellows across all training years. Methods: Bootcamp curriculum included foundational content in anticancer pharmacology, 4 core-domain “101” sessions, NCCN-based case discussions, clinical trial design, academic career development, workshop on difficult clinical conversations and Kahoot-based heme-path and board review. Content was delivered through 6 different interactive formats over the first 10 weeks of the academic year during a weekly protected half-day. Fellows completed anonymous pre- and post-bootcamp questionnaires assessing self-reported confidence on a 5-point Likert scale. Secondary outcomes included overall knowledge improvement, clinical confidence, satisfaction, and educational format preferences. Pre- and post-intervention scores were compared using Mann-Whitney test. Results: Sixteen fellows completed the pre-bootcamp survey and 13 completed the post-bootcamp survey. There was statistically significant improvements across all 4 core-domains: General Oncology and foundations (2.9 to 3.8; p < 0.01), Classical Hematology (3.0 to 3.7; p < 0.05), Hematologic Malignancies (2.8 to 3.7; p < 0.05), and Solid Tumors (2.5 to 3.4; p < 0.05). Case-based discussions and chalk-talks were the most effective formats, used in both 101 sessions and communication workshop (Table). Moderate or major improvements in overall knowledge as well as inpatient/outpatient clinical confidence were reported by 92.3% fellows. Quality meal options encouraged in-person attendance for 84.6% fellows. Overall satisfaction with the bootcamp was high, with 84.6% fellows reporting agreement or strong agreement. Conclusions: Early delivery of foundational concepts through interactive, case-based “101” curricula improves fellows’ knowledge and clinical confidence. While traditional lectures remain important for trial interpretation, incorporating interactive formats enhance confidence and satisfaction for fellows. This structured, guideline-based bootcamp represents a scalable model for fellowship training. Educational format effectiveness. Educational Format Mean Effectiveness Score (1-5) ± SD Chalk-talks 4.2 ± 0.7 Case-based scenarios 4.2 ± 0.6 Kahoot-based interactive rounds 3.9 ± 0.6 PowerPoint 3.6 ± 0.7 Group-discussions 3.3 ± 1.1 Online Modules 2.5 ± 0.8
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (7)
Chinmay Jani
University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL
Xena Xiaoshu Zheng
University of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL
Ali Al Sbihi
University of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL
Akshee Batra
University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center/Jackson Health System, Miami, FL
Thomas Plate
2University of Miami, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Benign Hematology, Miami, United States
James E. Hoffman
University of Miami Health System, Miami, FL
Janaki Neela Sharma
University of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL