HDAC inhibition sensitizes pancreatic tumors to DNA damage by global redistribution of the transcriptional machinery

G Gaoyang Liang (Gene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies) H Hung V.-T. Nguyen (Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology) J Jonathan Zhu H Herve Tiriac H Hadiqa Zafar (Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology) D Daniel Y. Cao (Gene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies) G Gabriela Estepa (Gene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute) D Dylan C. Nelson (Gene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies) Y Yang Dai T Tae Gyu Oh (Gene Expression Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies) C Christopher Liddle (Storr Liver Centre, Westmead Institute for Medical Research and Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney) R Ruth T. Yu T Tony Hunter (Molecular and Cell Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies) D Dannielle Engle (Molecular and Cell Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies) R Reuben Shaw (Molecular and Cell Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies) A Andrew M. Lowy W Weiwei Fan M Morgan L. Truitt (Gene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies) A Annette R. Atkins (Gene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies) J Jeremiah A. Johnson M Michael Downes R Ronald M. Evans

Abstract

The DNA damage response (DDR) is critical for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) development and therapeutic responses, including to genotoxic agents. While epigenetic modulators have been shown to contribute to the DDR, how chromatin regulation dictates responses to DNA damage in PDAC remains incompletely understood. Here, we identify Class I histone deacetylases (HDACs) as critical regulators of the DDR. HDAC1/2 direct the genomic distribution of H3K27ac, ensuring sufficient BRD4 and RNA polymerase II (Pol II) occupancy at DDR gene promoters. HDAC inhibition by entinostat shifts the balance of H3K27 acetylation preferentially toward intergenic regions, diverting BRD4 and Pol II from promoters, thereby suppressing DDR gene expression. In line with this, HDAC inhibition heightens DNA damage and sensitizes PDAC to diverse DNA-damaging and DDR-targeting agents. Since the clinical development of HDAC inhibitors has been limited by systemic toxicity, we developed bottlebrush prodrug (BPD) nanoparticles for tumor-selective entinostat delivery. Entinostat-BPD achieved tumor-specific HDAC inhibition while displaying potent efficacy and reduced systemic toxicity. These findings reveal an HDAC-dependent DDR vulnerability and offer combinational and precision targeting strategies to facilitate clinical translation and improve PDAC patient outcomes.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 123, Issue 26
Published June 30, 2026
ISSN 0027-8424
Publisher National Academy of Sciences

Authors (22)

G

Gaoyang Liang

Gene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies

H

Hung V.-T. Nguyen

Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

J

Jonathan Zhu

H

Herve Tiriac

H

Hadiqa Zafar

Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

D

Daniel Y. Cao

Gene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies

G

Gabriela Estepa

Gene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute

D

Dylan C. Nelson

Gene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies

Y

Yang Dai

T

Tae Gyu Oh

Gene Expression Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies

C

Christopher Liddle

Storr Liver Centre, Westmead Institute for Medical Research and Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney

R

Ruth T. Yu

T

Tony Hunter

Molecular and Cell Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies

D

Dannielle Engle

Molecular and Cell Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies

R

Reuben Shaw

Molecular and Cell Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies

A

Andrew M. Lowy

W

Weiwei Fan

M

Morgan L. Truitt

Gene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies

A

Annette R. Atkins

Gene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies

J

Jeremiah A. Johnson

M

Michael Downes

R

Ronald M. Evans