Hbc-positive status for hepatis B virus does not affect CAR-T cell outcomes in lymphoma: Results from the CART-SIE study
Abstract
Abstract Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation represents a potential complication in immunocompromised patients carrying occult B infection (OBI), including those receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. However, the clinical impact of HBV carriers remains unclear in this setting. We retrospectively analyzed a real-life cohort of 1124 patients who underwent CAR-T cell therapy for lymphoma to investigate whether HBV positivity without overt infection (anti-HBc positive, HBV-DNA negative) was associated with distinct clinical characteristics or outcomes within the observational CART-SIE Italian study. No patient had active HBV infection, which represents an exclusion criterion for CAR-T cell therapy in Italy. All HBV-positive patients received prophylactic antiviral treatment, predominantly with lamivudine (>90%). Patients were stratified into two groups: HBV-negative (HBV−, n=1010) and HBV-positive (HBV+, n=114). The most common diagnoses were diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, 713 patients; 63.4%), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL, 143; 12.7%), high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL, 114; 10.1%), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL, 98; 8.7%), and follicular lymphoma (FL, 56; 5.0%). The majority of patients were male (715; 63.6%). Axi-cel was the most frequently used CAR-T product (53.5%), followed by tisa-cel (32.8%), brexu-cel (12.6%), and liso-cel (1.2%). The mean number of prior therapy lines was 2.34 (standard deviation: 0.93), with 29.6% of patients having received a prior autologous stem cell transplant. Overall, 77.2% of patients underwent bridging therapy before CAR-T cell infusion. The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 16.5 months (95% CI: 13.2–17.8). Baseline characteristics were largely comparable between the 2 groups: median age was slightly higher among HBV-positive patients (62.2 vs 57.2 years; p<0.001); a significant difference was observed in disease subtype distribution, with a greater prevalence of DLBCL in the HBV-positive cohort (77.2% vs 61.9%; p=0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in response rates at day 30 (complete response [CR] 56.1% vs 57.0%; p=0.913) or day 90 (CR 63.3% vs 60.2%; p=0.791), nor in the relapse rate (42.0% vs 50.9%; p=0.073). Overall survival (OS) was comparable between HBV-positive and HBV-negative patients, with a 36-month OS of 52.6% vs 53.8%, respectively (p=0.239). Similarly, progression-free survival (PFS) did not significantly differ between the groups (36-month PFS 35.8% vs 58.8%; p=0.163). Even within the DLBCL subgroup, regardless of the treatment line, HBV-positivity did not appear to impact overall survival (OS, p=0.808) or progression-free survival (PFS, p=0.890). In the multivariable analysis, HBV positivity was not associated with differences in either overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS). Specifically, HBV-positive status did not significantly impact OS (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.80–1.57; p=0.497) or PFS (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.88–1.51; p=0.304). With regard to CAR-T-related toxicities, no cases of HBV reactivation were observed; the incidence of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) (26.8% vs 28.1%, p=0.824), immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity (ICAHT) (24.6% vs 18.4%, p=0.165), second malignancies (3.9% vs 6.1%, p=0.219), and infections (11.5% vs 9.6%, p=0.642) was comparable between HBV-negative and HBV-positive patients, respectively. Conversely, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred more frequently in HBV-negative patients (88.4% vs 81.6%, p=0.049), a finding that remained significant after adjustment for age, disease type, and CAR-T product (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32–0.95; p=0.033). No significant differences in toxicity grading were observed between the two cohorts for CRS (p=0.217), while HBV-positive patients experienced milder forms of ICANS (p=0.043).These findings suggest that HBV carrier status does not adversely affect response rates or long-term outcomes following CAR-T therapy and should not be considered a contraindication to treatment. The lower incidence of CRS and milder ICANS severity observed in HBV-positive patients may point to potential immunomodulatory effects exerted by OBI status and/or antiviral prophylaxis. Systematic HBV screening and appropriate antiviral prophylaxis remain essential to minimize the rare risk of viral reactivation.
Article Details
Authors (33)
Nicola Polverelli
1Unit of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapies - Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
Annalisa Chiappella
6Department of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
Pier Luigi Zinzani
12IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli,” Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Maurizio Musso
17Ospedale La Maddalena - Dipartimento Oncologico, Palermo, Italy
Maria Chiara Tisi
9Hematology Unit, San Bortolo Hospital, A.U. L. S. S. 8 “Berica”, Vicenza, Italy
Fabio Ciceri
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan
Ilaria Cutini
4Department of Cellular Therapies and Transfusion Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
Armando Santoro
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan
Patrizia Chiusolo
6Section of Hematology, Department of Radiological and Hematological Sciences, Catholic University, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
Alessandro Rambaldi
5University of Milan and Azienda Socio Sanitaria territorial Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy, Department of Hematology-Oncology, Bergamo, Italy
Mirko Farina
Alice Di Rocco
6Division of Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
Lucia Brunello
Massimo Martino
12Stem Cell Transplant and Cellular Therapies Unit, Great Metropolitan Hospital “Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli”, Reggio Calabria, Italy
Mauro Krampera
18Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Section of Biomedicine of Innovation, Department of Engineering for Innovative Medicine (DIMI), University of Verona, Verona, Italy
Alessia Castellino
20Division of Hematology - AO S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo and Laboratory of Blood Tumor Immunology, Molecular Biotechnology Center “Guido Tarone”, University of Torino, Cuneo, Italy
Giovanni Grillo
17Dipartimento di Ematologia e Trapianto di midollo, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
Barbara Botto
8Department of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
Francesca Patriarca
18Università di Udine/Italy, Udine, Italy
Michele Clerico
14AOU “Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
Pellegrino Musto
17Unità di Ematologia e Trapianto di Midollo Osseo, AOUC Policlinico, Bari, Italy
Attilio Olivieri
37Ospedale Regionale delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
Maria Grazia Benevento
1Unit of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapies - Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
Antonio Bianchessi
1Unit of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapies - Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
Irene Defrancesco
1Unit of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapies - Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
Giulia Losi
1Unit of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapies - Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
Caterina Zerbi
1Unit of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapies - Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
Elisa Roncoroni
13Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
Manuel Gotti
23Division of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
Alessia Taurino
1Unit of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapies - Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
Anna Fedina
23Fondazione Italiana Linfomi, Modena, Italy
Paolo Corradini
8Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS, Haematology, Milan, Italy
Luca Arcaini
Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy