Hartree–Fock density functional theory works through error cancellation for the interaction energies of halogen and chalcogen bonded complexes
Abstract
Unusually large energy errors of semi-local density functional approximations (DFAs) for molecules are often strongly reduced by using the Hartree–Fock (HF) electron density instead of the self-consistent DFA density. For reaction barriers and water clusters, some of us earlier found that HF-density functional theory (DFT) succeeds not because the HF density is accurate but due to the cancellation of negative functional-driven error (FE) by positive density-driven error (DE). Since DE, as defined here, is biased toward the self-consistent DFA density and against the HF density, the DE of the HF density is referred to as non-variational density over-localization (NVDO). In this work, we show that interaction energy errors in halogen- and chalcogen-bonded complexes in the B30 dataset are not dominated by density-driven error. Instead, HF-DFT again succeeds through FE–NVDO cancellation. Benchmark Kohn–Sham inversions of coupled-cluster densities for NH3⋯ClF, Cl−⋯ClF, Cl−⋯SF2, Cl−⋯SCF2, and Cl−⋯PF3 provide strong evidence for this cancellation. For additional complexes, we employ the long-range-corrected hybrid LCωPBE as a proxy for electron-transfer errors in the exact density. We also examine several self-interaction correction (SIC) methods and find significant improvement from FLOSIC. We point out common features of the density errors in the NH3⋯ClF and Cl−⋯ClF complexes and three transition states, arguing that significant density-driven errors of energy arise only from electron-transfer errors. We also highlight a common feature in our present and previous work: long bonds can lead to non-negligible functional-driven self-interaction error of the energy from otherwise accurate semi-local functionals in transition states, water clusters, and halogen or chalcogen bonds.
Article Details
Journal Info
The Journal of Chemical Physics
American Institute of Physics
Authors (7)
Niraj Pangeni
Department of Physics and Engineering Physics, Tulane University 1 , New Orleans, Louisiana 70118,
Chandra Shahi
Department of Physics and Engineering Physics, Tulane University 1 , New Orleans, Louisiana 70118,
John P. Perdew
Department of Physics and Engineering Physics
Vishal Subramanian
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, University of Michigan 2 , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109,
Bikash Kanungo
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan 3 , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109,
Vikram Gavini
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, University of Michigan 2 , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109,
Adrienn Ruzsinszky
Department of Physics and Engineering Physics, Tulane University 1 , New Orleans, Louisiana 70118,