Gut dysbiosis as a potential guide for immunotherapy (dis)continuation after 2 years in non-small cell lung cancer: A mono-institutional, multi-omic assessment.

L Lorenzo Belluomini A Adele Bonato (Section of Oncology, Department of Engineering for Innovation Medicine (DIMI), University of Verona School of Medicine and Verona University Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy) C Claudia Parisi (Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Thoracic Group and International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France) P Priscilla Cascetta (Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, Paris, France, France) A Anna Reni (Section of Innovation Biomedicine - Oncology Area, Department of Engineering for Innovation Medicine (DIMI), University of Verona, Verona, Italy, Italy) M May-Lucie Meyer (University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland) M Mariona Riudavets (Cancer Medicine Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France) D David Planchard B Benjamin Besse J Jordi Remon Masip (Gustave Roussy, Paris, France) F Francesco Facchinetti (Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France) F Fabrice Barlesi L Lisa Derosa (Gustave Roussy)

Abstract

2654 Background: Although most phase II and III clinical trials have set the duration of immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at two years, there remains uncertainty regarding the feasibility and safety of discontinuing treatment after this period. Of note, gut microbial taxonomic profiling prior to starting immunotherapy shows promise as biomarker for predicting ICB response. Here, we recommend integrating multi-omics approaches over time (24 months -mo-) to inform clinical decision-making and guide personalized treatment strategies. Methods: Pts completing 18 to 24 mo of ICB treatment between July 2016 and January 2023 were identified and enrolled (NCT04567446) at Gustave Roussy. Clinical factors influencing treatment (dis)continuation were assessed at 24 mo. Multi-omic analyses, including gut-based biomarkers (TOPOSCORE by whole genome sequencing), PET-FDG imaging, and ctDNA, were proposed at this timepoint. Key outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates, were analyzed. Results: Among 123 advanced NSCLC pts treated for ≥18 mo, 35 (28,5%) completed 24 mo, with 31 included in the analysis (4 excluded due to PD). Of these, 68% continued ICB, while 32% stopped between 23.5 and 29.7 mo, mainly based on the physician or the patient decision. Clinical characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups (Table 1). After a median follow-up of 59.1 mo, no significant OS and PFS differences were observed between pts who discontinued and those who continued (OS p=0.9012, PFS p=0.3715). Among the multi-omic assessments performed at 24 mo, only gut-based biomarkers appeared to be conditionally associated with PFS24 rates. The proportion of long-responders (progression-free at 24 mo) was higher among those with a favorable gut composition compared to those with harmful composition (81% vs 44%, respectively, p=0.0870). Conclusions: Our results suggest that multi-omics approaches may help safely discontinue ICB after two years of treatment. In this context, multi-institutional validation and the implementation of a translational multi-omic algorithm, including gut-based biomarkers, could provide insight into the optimal duration of ICB therapy beyond the predefined 24-mo period. Clinical trial information: NCT04567446 . Clinical characteristics of the cohort (n=31). Characteristics Cessation group Pursuit group p-value* N = 10 N = 21 Gender - no. (%) Male 5 (50) 12 (57) 0.7366 Female 5 (50) 9 (43) Age years - median (range) 61 (39-68) 62 (43-77) ECOG performance status - no. (%) 0-1 9 (90) 15 (71) 0.2044 2 1 (10) 6 (29) PD-L1 expression - no. (%) <1% 0 2 (13) 0.5749 ≥1%-<50% 3 (30) 2 (13) ≥50% 7 (70) 11 (73) unknown - 6 Treatment regimen - no. (%) Chemoimmunotherapy 3 (30) 2 (10) 0.1907 Monoimmunotherapy 7 (70) 19 (90) Line of treatment - no. (%) First 7 (70) 10 (48) 0.7332 ≥ Second 3 (30) 11 (52) *Chi-Square test.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 2654-2654
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (13)

L

Lorenzo Belluomini

A

Adele Bonato

Section of Oncology, Department of Engineering for Innovation Medicine (DIMI), University of Verona School of Medicine and Verona University Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy

C

Claudia Parisi

Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Thoracic Group and International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France

P

Priscilla Cascetta

Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, Paris, France, France

A

Anna Reni

Section of Innovation Biomedicine - Oncology Area, Department of Engineering for Innovation Medicine (DIMI), University of Verona, Verona, Italy, Italy

M

May-Lucie Meyer

University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

M

Mariona Riudavets

Cancer Medicine Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

D

David Planchard

B

Benjamin Besse

J

Jordi Remon Masip

Gustave Roussy, Paris, France

F

Francesco Facchinetti

Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

F

Fabrice Barlesi

L

Lisa Derosa

Gustave Roussy