Gut-associated checkpoint as a prognostic biomarker in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Results from a randomized first-line clinical trial.

R Renee Maria Saliby (Center of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT) M Marc Machaalani C Caiwei Zhong (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) C Carolina Alves Costa Silva C Chris Labaki (Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA) E Eddy Saad C Clara Steiner (University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany) E Emre Yekedüz M Marc Eid (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) W Wassim Daoud Khatoun (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) M Maxine Sun (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) T Ti Cai (EMD Serono Research and Development Institute, Billerica, MA) D David A. Braun W Wenxin Xu (Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA) L Lisa Derosa (Gustave Roussy) G Gwo-Shu Mary Lee (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) W Wanling Xie (Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA) L Laurence Albiges (Department of Medical Oncology Gustave Roussy Villejuif France) L Laurence Zitvogel T Toni K. Choueiri (Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA)

Abstract

4512 Background: The gut microbiota modulates anti-cancer immune response and therefore benefit to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Gut dysbiosis impacts the MadCAM-1/α4β7 axis leading to recirculation of immunosuppressive α4β7+Tr17 cells into tumors. From mechanistic insight to biomarker development, soluble MAdCMA-1 (sMAdCAM-1) is a circulating surrogate marker of gut dysbiosis. We aim to develop sMAdCAM-1 as a prognostic biomarker to ICI-based therapy in patients (pts) with mRCC. Methods: Using a Luminex assay, sMAdCAM-1 levels were measured in available plasma samples at baseline from 612 pts (69% of the intent-to-treat population) from the phase III JAVELIN Renal 101 trial (NCT02684006), which compared avelumab + axitinib with sunitinib in previously untreated mRCC pts. sMAdCAM-1 was examined on the original, per 10^4-scaled, and log-transformed scales. Linear assumption was visually checked by deviance residual and restricted cubic splines (RCS) plots. Optimal cut-off value was established based on the maximum log-rank statistic. Cox regression models were used to assess associations with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The discrimination of the fitted model was assessed by time-dependent AUC index. Results: Higher sMAdCAM-1 levels were associated with improved PFS (median: 13.9 [11.3 - 6.6] vs 8.4 [6.0 - 9.9] months) and OS rate (at 18 months: 84.2% [80.2 - 87.4] vs 68.1% [59.2 - 75.5]). These associations remained after adjusting for IMDC risk groups (Table 1). The optimal cutoff was 180 ng/ml (25% percentile) based on the OS outcome in the whole population. Residual and RCS plots further confirmed a non-linear relationship of sMAdCAM-1 levels with OS and PFS. Median follow up was 18.9 months. The prognostic model incorporating IMDC + sMAdCAM-1 demonstrated a significant improvement in the AUC at 18 months compared to IMDC alone (0.72 vs 0.68; p=0.01). These associations were independent of study arm. Conclusions: Higher sMAdCAM-1 is associated with improved outcomes to 1 st line regimens in mRCC. sMAdCAM-1 may have an added prognostic value to IMDC. As a diagnostic test of gut dysbiosis, it might guide the selection of pts eligible to microbiota-modulating strategies. The validation in two independent datasets and multi-omics correlation (i.e. fecal metagenomics) are ongoing under an international collaboration network. Association of MAdCam-1 with clinical outcomes using Cox regression model. Parameters PFS HR (95% CI) OS HR (95% CI) Favorable Ref Ref Intermediate 1.77 (1.31- 2.39) <0.001 3.01 (1.60 - 5.66) <0.001 Poor 2.88 (1.99 - 4.17) <0.001 7.91 (4.02 - 15.56) <0.001 sMAdCAM-1(high vs low) 0.75 (0.59 - 0.96) 0.021 0.59 (0.41 - 0.85) 0.004

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 4512-4512
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

R

Renee Maria Saliby

Center of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

M

Marc Machaalani

C

Caiwei Zhong

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

C

Carolina Alves Costa Silva

C

Chris Labaki

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA

E

Eddy Saad

C

Clara Steiner

University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

E

Emre Yekedüz

M

Marc Eid

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

W

Wassim Daoud Khatoun

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

M

Maxine Sun

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

T

Ti Cai

EMD Serono Research and Development Institute, Billerica, MA

D

David A. Braun

W

Wenxin Xu

Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA

L

Lisa Derosa

Gustave Roussy

G

Gwo-Shu Mary Lee

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

W

Wanling Xie

Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA

L

Laurence Albiges

Department of Medical Oncology Gustave Roussy Villejuif France

L

Laurence Zitvogel

T

Toni K. Choueiri

Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA