Golcadomide (GOLCA), a potential, first-in-class, oral CELMoD™ agent, plus R-CHOP in patients (Pts) with previously untreated aggressive B-cell lymphoma (a-BCL): 24-month efficacy Results

G Grzegorz Nowakowski (1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States) M Marc Hoffmann J Javier Muñoz J Jason Westin (3Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) A Alejandro Martin Garcia-Sancho M Michal Kwiatek (2AIDPORT Clinical Trials Hospital, Skorzewo, Poland) W Wojciech Jurczak M Maria Bouzani (8Evangelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece) M Muhamad Alhaj Moustafa (2Mayo Clinic Florida, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Jacksonville, United States) A Akshay Sudhindra (9Bristol Myers Squibb, Late Clinical Development, Hematology/Oncology and Cell Therapy, Madison, United States) A Argyrios Gkasiamis (37Bristol Myers Squibb, Boudry, Switzerland) A Arpankumar Patel (12Bristol Myers Squibb, Late Clinical Development, Hematology/Oncology and Cell Therapy, Princeton, United States) F Floriane Boucaud (11Bristol Myers Squibb, Late Clinical Development, Hematology/Oncology and Cell Therapy, Boudry, Switzerland) S Serena Perna (9Bristol Myers Squibb, Late Clinical Development, Hematology/Oncology and Cell Therapy, Madison, United States) T Theodoros Vassilakopoulos (18Hematology, University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece)

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Nearly 60% of pts with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are cured with first-line chemoimmunotherapy; ~40% will relapse or have refractory disease, mostly pts with high International Prognostic Index (IPI) scores of 3–5. Pts with IPI scores of 1–2 with bulky disease and/or very high LDH levels have also been identified as a high risk (HR) population (Maurer et al, ASH 2023, #4512). GOLCA is a potential, first-in-class, oral CELMoD agent designed for the treatment (Tx) of lymphoma, with preferential distribution to lymphoid organs and enhanced activity in lymphoma cell lines. GOLCA drives the closed, active conformation of cereblon to induce rapid and deep degradation of Ikaros and Aiolos, leading to direct cell killing (agnostic of cell of origin [COO]) and immunomodulatory activity. CC-220-DLBCL-001 (NCT04884035) is an ongoing Phase 1b, open-label, multicenter trial to assess safety and preliminary efficacy of GOLCA+R-CHOP in previously untreated a-BCL. GOLCA+R-CHOP demonstrated a manageable safety profile and encouraging efficacy with high end of Tx (EOT) complete metabolic response (CMR) and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rates (Amzallag et al, ASH 2024, #579). We report efficacy results with median follow-up (f/u) of 24 mos, including 24-mo progression-free survival (PFS) rates. Methods Pts aged ≥18 years with ECOG PS ≤2, IPI 0–5 (Part 1) and IPI 2–5 (Part 2), and previously untreated a-BCL with measurable disease were included. Pts were treated with GOLCA+R-CHOP for 6 cycles of 21 days (D) or until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity/study withdrawal. In dose escalation, GOLCA dose levels were 0.2mg D1–7, 0.4mg D1–7 (recommended Ph 2 dose), or 0.4mg D1–10. In dose expansion, pts were randomized 1:1 to R-CHOP+GOLCA 0.2 or 0.4mg. Primary endpoint was safety of GOLCA at 0.4mg (cutoff 23 Sep 2024); efficacy (cutoff 12 May 2025) was a secondary endpoint. HR pts were defined as: IPI 1-2 with HR features (≥1 lesion with maximum diameter ≥7 cm and/or screening LDH >1.3×ULN) or IPI 3–5. Results At cutoff, 78 pts were treated with GOLCA+R-CHOP (n=35 at 0.2mg D1–7, n=37 at 0.4mg D1–7, n=6 at 0.4mg D1–10). Baseline characteristics were described previously. Sixty-five pts (83%) completed Tx, and 72 (92%) entered the f/u period (61 [78%] ongoing). Tx was discontinued in 17% of pts, primarily due to progressive disease (3%) and adverse events (AEs; 6%). Median relative dose intensity for GOLCA and CHO components was high (97%–99%), indicating uncompromised delivery of curative standard-of-care (SOC) Tx. Seventy-two pts were efficacy evaluable (n=34 at 0.2mg D1–7, n=33 at 0.4mg D1–7). At 0.4mg, EOT CMR rate was 88% (29/33); all 29 pts were alive and progression free at cutoff. In HR pts at 0.4mg, EOT CMR rate was 89% (25/28) and was similar in pts with GCB (16/17 [94%]) and non-GCB/ABC (9/11 [82%]) phenotypes. Of pts treated with 0.4mg with available ctDNA data, 90% achieved MRD negativity (undetectable ctDNA by PhasED-Seq assay) at EOT. All pts still in f/u at time of data cutoff had reached the 24-mo efficacy assessment. At median f/u of 24 mos (range, 0.7–34.4), the 24-mo PFS rate was 79% in both 0.4mg and HR 0.4mg pts and consistent in pts with GCB (88%) and non-GCB/ABC (73%) phenotypes. The 24-mo OS at 0.4mg was 85.3% overall and 86.2% in HR pts. Pts treated at 0.4mg D1–7 and D1–10 had comparable exposure to GOLCA (no pt completed the 10-day schedule). In pooled D1–7 and D1–10 schedules, 24-mo PFS was 82% in overall and HR populations. Grade 3/4 Tx-emergent AEs (TEAEs) in the safety population were mainly hematologic and occurred in 91% of pts (neutropenia [87%], an on-target side effect of GOLCA; thrombocytopenia [42%]; anemia [36%]; febrile neutropenia [22%]); neutrophil nadir and recovery occurred in a predictable fashion. Serious TEAEs occurred in 36 pts (46%). Non-hematologic AEs (fatigue, rash, GI disorders) were infrequent and mostly low grade. Conclusions GOLCA (0.4mg) +R-CHOP resulted in a high rate of durable CMRs, irrespective of COO, and promising 24-mo PFS in the overall and HR populations. GOLCA+R-CHOP demonstrated a predictable and manageable safety profile with low rates of non-hematologic AEs; addition of GOLCA to R-CHOP did not compromise SOC delivery. These data continue to show that GOLCA 0.4mg, when added to SOC Tx, has a potential to cure more previously untreated pts with HR LBCL and support the ongoing Phase 3 trial, GOLSEEK-1, in this population (NCT06356129).

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 476-476
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (15)

G

Grzegorz Nowakowski

1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States

M

Marc Hoffmann

J

Javier Muñoz

J

Jason Westin

3Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

A

Alejandro Martin Garcia-Sancho

M

Michal Kwiatek

2AIDPORT Clinical Trials Hospital, Skorzewo, Poland

W

Wojciech Jurczak

M

Maria Bouzani

8Evangelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece

M

Muhamad Alhaj Moustafa

2Mayo Clinic Florida, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Jacksonville, United States

A

Akshay Sudhindra

9Bristol Myers Squibb, Late Clinical Development, Hematology/Oncology and Cell Therapy, Madison, United States

A

Argyrios Gkasiamis

37Bristol Myers Squibb, Boudry, Switzerland

A

Arpankumar Patel

12Bristol Myers Squibb, Late Clinical Development, Hematology/Oncology and Cell Therapy, Princeton, United States

F

Floriane Boucaud

11Bristol Myers Squibb, Late Clinical Development, Hematology/Oncology and Cell Therapy, Boudry, Switzerland

S

Serena Perna

9Bristol Myers Squibb, Late Clinical Development, Hematology/Oncology and Cell Therapy, Madison, United States

T

Theodoros Vassilakopoulos

18Hematology, University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece