Global cancer mortality attributable to armed conflict: A GBD 1990–2021 analysis.
Abstract
e23239 Background: Armed conflict disrupts cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment continuity, yet its contribution to global cancer mortality has not been systematically quantified using standardized population-level data. We leveraged Global Burden of Disease (GBD) estimates to evaluate the association between armed conflict exposure and cancer mortality across countries and over time. Methods: We conducted a longitudinal, country-level analysis using GBD 2021 estimates (1990–2021) for all-cancer mortality, age-standardized cancer death rates, years of life lost (YLLs), and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Armed conflict exposure was operationalized using GBD estimates for mortality due to conflict and terrorism, treated as a time-varying proxy for conflict intensity. Countries were categorized annually into conflict-intensity strata (none, low, moderate, high) based on conflict-related death rates. We assessed associations between conflict intensity and cancer outcomes using mixed-effects regression models with country-level random intercepts, adjusting for calendar year and sociodemographic index (SDI). Excess cancer mortality attributable to conflict was estimated by comparing observed cancer mortality in conflict-exposed country-years with model-predicted counterfactual mortality under a no-conflict reference stratum. Results: Across the 1990–2021 study period, increasing conflict intensity was consistently associated with higher age-standardized cancer death rates and greater cancer-related YLLs. The association demonstrated a dose–response pattern, with the largest excess cancer mortality observed in high-intensity conflict settings and in lower-SDI regions. Temporal analyses showed that sustained conflict exposure was associated with persistently elevated cancer mortality burden compared with non-conflict periods. Patterns were broadly consistent across sexes and major world regions. Conclusions: Using standardized GBD estimates, armed conflict intensity is associated with excess cancer mortality and premature cancer death at the population level. These findings support conceptualizing armed conflict as a structural determinant of cancer outcomes and underscore the need for resilient oncology care delivery, continuity-of-treatment strategies, and targeted cancer control interventions in conflict-affected settings.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (7)
Sweta Sahu
J.J.M. Medical College, Davangere, India
Neha Pillai Vinod
SRM Medical College and Research Center, Chennai, India
Daisha Rathod
Osmania medical college, Hyderabad, India
Purvy Manhari Ravula
Mamata Medical College, Khammam, India
Himanshu Khangwal
North Delhi Municipal Corporation Medical College, Hindu Rao Hospital, Delhi, India
Vaishnavi Kandukuri
Harnett Health Systems Inc., Dunn, NC
Yuktha Sridhar
J.J.M Medical College, Davangere, India