Germline pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes and overall survival of women with breast cancer.

Abstract

10510 Background: The impact of germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PVs) in cancer predisposition genes on overall survival (OS) after breast cancer diagnosis is not well defined. In particular, unbiased OS estimates from population-based studies accounting for clinical subtypes of breast cancer (based on ER, PR, and HER2 status) and for genes other than BRCA1/2 are lacking. Methods: The study included 25,168 prospectively followed women with locoregional invasive breast cancer within the population-based CARRIERS study. Germline sequencing using a custom multigene amplicon-based panel was performed to identify PVs. OS was compared between germline PV carriers in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2 and PALB2 and non-carriers (negative for germline PVs in 13 known breast cancer predisposition genes) for each clinical subtype of breast cancer from the time of breast cancer diagnosis to death or last follow up in a multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis adjusting for age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, histology, TNM stage, type of surgery, use of adjuvant radiation, chemotherapy and endocrine agents. Results: Among 25,168 women with breast cancer, germline PVs in one of the five breast cancer predisposition genes were detected in 5.8% of the women [ ATM : 0.8%, BRCA1 : 1.3%, BRCA2: 1.6%, CHEK2 : 1.5%, and PALB2 : 0.6%]. Among women with ER+ breast cancer, compared to non-carriers, a significantly worse OS was noted for BRCA1 (Hazard Ratio (HR): 1.8, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.1 – 3.0, p=0.02) and BRCA2 (HR: 1.8, 95%CI: 1.4 – 2.4, p<0.001), but not for ATM (HR: 1.2, 95%CI: 0.8 – 1.7, p=0.40) or CHEK2 (HR:1.0, 95%CI: 0.8 – 1.3, p=1.0) PV carriers. Worse OS was noted in PALB2 PV carriers with ER+ breast cancer (HR:1.5, 95%CI: 0.9 – 2.2, p=0.09), although it did not reach statistical significance. Similar HR estimates for OS as with ER+ breast cancer were observed in women with ER+/HER2- breast cancer for BRCA1 , BRCA2 and PALB2 PV carriers, but only BRCA2 results were statistically significant. Among women with ER-negative breast cancer, compared to non-carriers, a significant difference in OS was not observed for PV carriers in ATM (HR:0.8, 95%CI: 0.4 – 1.8, p=0.63), BRCA1 (HR:1.2, 95%CI: 0.8 – 1.7, p=0.35), BRCA2 (HR: 0.8, 95%CI: 0.5 – 1.2, p=0.29), CHEK2 (HR: 0.7, 95%CI: 0.3 – 1.4), or PALB2 (HR: 0.9, 95%CI: 0.5 -1.7, p=0.78). Conclusions: The suggestive differences in OS by ER status of the tumor in BRCA1 and BRCA2 PV carriers warrant further investigation of underlying tumor biology and assessment of endocrine sensitivity of breast cancer in germline PV carriers.