Germline genetic correlates in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus non-steroidal anti-androgen (NSAA) or enzalutamide (ENZA): Correlative study of ENZAMET (ANZUP 1304).

A Anis Hamid M Monica Guilhaus (South Australia Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, Adelaide University, Adelaide, SA, Australia) A Arun Azad (Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia) J Jacqueline Rehn (South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia) E Emily Grist (University College London, London, United Kingdom) E Edmond Michael Kwan (Monash University and Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia) V Vinod Subhash (ANZUP Cancer Clinical Trials Group, Sydney, Australia) S Samantha Richelle Oakes (Australian & New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, Australia) J James G. Kench (Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia) S Saud AlDubayan E Eliezer Mendel Van Allen (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) M Martin R. Stockler A Alexander William Wyatt (Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada) G Gerhardt Attard L Lisa Horvath I Ian D. Davis (School of Medicine, Monash University) C Christopher Sweeney (South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, Adelaide University, Adelaide, SA, Australia)

Abstract

5099 Background: The international, randomized, phase III ENZAMET trial (n=1125) showed improved overall survival (OS) with ADT plus ENZA vs ADT plus NSAA for mHSPC. Observational studies showed that the mHSPC genetic landscape is comparable to castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Prognostic and predictive impact of inherited pathogenic variants (PVs), including those affecting BRCA1 , BRCA2 and other DNA damage and repair (DDR) genes, on androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI)-treated mHSPC is under investigation. Methods: Whole exome sequencing of germline DNA prospectively obtained from ENZAMET pts. Variant annotation and effect prediction identified PVs (altered “+” vs wild-type “-”). Prognostic effect of PVs was assessed within arms. Endpoints: clinical progression-free survival (PFS) and OS by Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox models. Multivariable analyses (MVA) adjusted for Gleason score (GS), volume (vol), metachronous vs synchronous and docetaxel (D) use. Results: All 847 available samples were successfully sequenced. 123 PVs were identified in 117 (13.8%) pts, of which 46 (5.43%) pts harbored a PV in ≥1 DDR gene. The rate of pathogenic germline BRCA1 / BRCA2 (BRCA) PVs was 2.13% (39.1% of DDR PVs). Proportions of arm, D use, vol and visceral disease were similar between DDR+ vs DDR- and BRCA+ vs BRCA-. Synchronous mHSPC in DDR+ vs DDR- and BRCA+ vs BRCA- was 41.3% vs 63.0% and 44.4% vs 62.2%, respectively. PFS and OS estimates were similar between BRCA+ and BRCA- groups in the overall cohort (5-yr OS: 55.6% vs 61%; 3-yr PFS: 50% vs 53.5%, respectively) and in the ENZA arm, but differed in the NSAA arm (Table). BRCA+ treated with ADT+NSAA (67% D use) had shortest PFS (median PFS: 11.3m vs 24.9m [BRCA-], HR 1.85, 95% CI: 0.95-3.6). D use associated with poorer outcomes. In MVA, the HR(PFS) for BRCA+ in NSAA arm was 1.47 (95% CI 0.71-3.04, p=0.3) vs ENZA arm: HR 0.98, (95% CI 0.31-3.08, p=0.97). Vol and GS were independently significant in both arms. Conclusions: In one of the largest germline genetic studies from a phase III mHSPC trial, we observed recurrent DDR and BRCA PVs at a lower rate than institutional cohorts. Germline BRCA PVs are associated with a shorter PFS on ADT+NSAA – an effect which may be mitigated by ENZA. Validation in independent trial cohorts is ongoing. Outcomes by arm/docetaxel and BRCA status. n 5y-OS % (95% CI) 3y-PFS % (95% CI) NSAA only BRCA- 238 56.6 (50.0-62.7) 42.9 (36.5-49.1) NSAA only BRCA+ 3 66.7 (5.4-94.5) 66.7 (5.4-94.5) NSAA+D BRCA- 176 54.7 (47.0-61.8) 32.5 (25.7-39.6) NSAA+D BRCA+ 6 33.3 (4.6-67.6) 16.7 (0.8-51.7) ENZA only BRCA- 228 70.6 (64.2-76.0) 73.3 (67.0-78.5) ENZA only BRCA+ 7 71.4 (25.8-92.0) 71.4 (25.8-92.0) ENZA+D BRCA- 187 60.7 (53.2-67.3) 62.3 (54.9-58.8) ENZA+D BRCA+ 2 NE 50.0 (0.6-91.0)

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 5099-5099
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (17)

A

Anis Hamid

M

Monica Guilhaus

South Australia Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, Adelaide University, Adelaide, SA, Australia

A

Arun Azad

Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia

J

Jacqueline Rehn

South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia

E

Emily Grist

University College London, London, United Kingdom

E

Edmond Michael Kwan

Monash University and Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia

V

Vinod Subhash

ANZUP Cancer Clinical Trials Group, Sydney, Australia

S

Samantha Richelle Oakes

Australian & New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, Australia

J

James G. Kench

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia

S

Saud AlDubayan

E

Eliezer Mendel Van Allen

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

M

Martin R. Stockler

A

Alexander William Wyatt

Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

G

Gerhardt Attard

L

Lisa Horvath

I

Ian D. Davis

School of Medicine, Monash University

C

Christopher Sweeney

South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, Adelaide University, Adelaide, SA, Australia