Germline genetic correlates in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus non-steroidal anti-androgen (NSAA) or enzalutamide (ENZA): Correlative study of ENZAMET (ANZUP 1304).
Abstract
5099 Background: The international, randomized, phase III ENZAMET trial (n=1125) showed improved overall survival (OS) with ADT plus ENZA vs ADT plus NSAA for mHSPC. Observational studies showed that the mHSPC genetic landscape is comparable to castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Prognostic and predictive impact of inherited pathogenic variants (PVs), including those affecting BRCA1 , BRCA2 and other DNA damage and repair (DDR) genes, on androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI)-treated mHSPC is under investigation. Methods: Whole exome sequencing of germline DNA prospectively obtained from ENZAMET pts. Variant annotation and effect prediction identified PVs (altered “+” vs wild-type “-”). Prognostic effect of PVs was assessed within arms. Endpoints: clinical progression-free survival (PFS) and OS by Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox models. Multivariable analyses (MVA) adjusted for Gleason score (GS), volume (vol), metachronous vs synchronous and docetaxel (D) use. Results: All 847 available samples were successfully sequenced. 123 PVs were identified in 117 (13.8%) pts, of which 46 (5.43%) pts harbored a PV in ≥1 DDR gene. The rate of pathogenic germline BRCA1 / BRCA2 (BRCA) PVs was 2.13% (39.1% of DDR PVs). Proportions of arm, D use, vol and visceral disease were similar between DDR+ vs DDR- and BRCA+ vs BRCA-. Synchronous mHSPC in DDR+ vs DDR- and BRCA+ vs BRCA- was 41.3% vs 63.0% and 44.4% vs 62.2%, respectively. PFS and OS estimates were similar between BRCA+ and BRCA- groups in the overall cohort (5-yr OS: 55.6% vs 61%; 3-yr PFS: 50% vs 53.5%, respectively) and in the ENZA arm, but differed in the NSAA arm (Table). BRCA+ treated with ADT+NSAA (67% D use) had shortest PFS (median PFS: 11.3m vs 24.9m [BRCA-], HR 1.85, 95% CI: 0.95-3.6). D use associated with poorer outcomes. In MVA, the HR(PFS) for BRCA+ in NSAA arm was 1.47 (95% CI 0.71-3.04, p=0.3) vs ENZA arm: HR 0.98, (95% CI 0.31-3.08, p=0.97). Vol and GS were independently significant in both arms. Conclusions: In one of the largest germline genetic studies from a phase III mHSPC trial, we observed recurrent DDR and BRCA PVs at a lower rate than institutional cohorts. Germline BRCA PVs are associated with a shorter PFS on ADT+NSAA – an effect which may be mitigated by ENZA. Validation in independent trial cohorts is ongoing. Outcomes by arm/docetaxel and BRCA status. n 5y-OS % (95% CI) 3y-PFS % (95% CI) NSAA only BRCA- 238 56.6 (50.0-62.7) 42.9 (36.5-49.1) NSAA only BRCA+ 3 66.7 (5.4-94.5) 66.7 (5.4-94.5) NSAA+D BRCA- 176 54.7 (47.0-61.8) 32.5 (25.7-39.6) NSAA+D BRCA+ 6 33.3 (4.6-67.6) 16.7 (0.8-51.7) ENZA only BRCA- 228 70.6 (64.2-76.0) 73.3 (67.0-78.5) ENZA only BRCA+ 7 71.4 (25.8-92.0) 71.4 (25.8-92.0) ENZA+D BRCA- 187 60.7 (53.2-67.3) 62.3 (54.9-58.8) ENZA+D BRCA+ 2 NE 50.0 (0.6-91.0)
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (17)
Anis Hamid
Monica Guilhaus
South Australia Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, Adelaide University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
Arun Azad
Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia
Jacqueline Rehn
South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
Emily Grist
University College London, London, United Kingdom
Edmond Michael Kwan
Monash University and Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia
Vinod Subhash
ANZUP Cancer Clinical Trials Group, Sydney, Australia
Samantha Richelle Oakes
Australian & New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, Australia
James G. Kench
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
Saud AlDubayan
Eliezer Mendel Van Allen
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
Martin R. Stockler
Alexander William Wyatt
Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Gerhardt Attard
Lisa Horvath
Ian D. Davis
School of Medicine, Monash University
Christopher Sweeney
South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, Adelaide University, Adelaide, SA, Australia