Genomic landscape of <i>ERBB3</i> alterations in 5,416 metastatic solid tumors: Real-world evidence regarding biomarker-agnostic ADC strategies.
Abstract
3090 Background: While ERBB2 (HER2) is a well-established therapeutic target, the clinical significance and genomic landscape of ERBB3 (HER3) across diverse solid tumors are less defined. As HER3 emerges as a critical mediator of resistance and a target for novel antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), characterizing its genomic alterations in a real-world setting is essential to refine therapeutic positioning. Methods: We analyzed clinical next-generation sequencing (NGS) data (Illumina TSO 500 or Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus) from 5,416 patients with metastatic solid tumors at a single tertiary center (Samsung Medical Center) between 2019 and 2025. ERBB3 alterations were categorized into mutations (SNVs/indels, VAF ≥2%) and amplifications (copy number [CN] ≥4). Results: ERBB3 alterations were identified in 12.9% (697/5,416) of patients. The prevalence was overwhelmingly driven by mutations (12.3%), while amplifications were rare (0.6%). The highest mutation frequencies were observed in: Urothelial carcinoma, 18.2%; Malignancy of unknown origin, 16.3%; and Biliary tract cancer, 15.7%. The most frequent variants were K498I (Domain IV) and R1127H (C-terminal tail). Known oncogenic hotspots (V104, A232V, G284R, E928G) were present but not dominant. Notably, the ERBB3-mutated cohort exhibited high co-mutation rates with canonical drivers: TP53 (66%), APC (35%), and KRAS (31%). In common GI cancers, ERBB3 mutations frequently co-occurred with APC and KRAS, suggesting they often act as "passenger" or secondary events rather than primary drivers. High-level amplifications (CN ≥8) were rare (<0.1%) and appeared in isolated cases across various histologies. Conclusions: ERBB3 alterations are relatively common (12.9%) in metastatic solid tumors but are characterized by a diverse mutational landscape rather than focal amplifications. The high frequency of co-occurring canonical drivers suggests that HER3 primarily functions as a resistance hub or facilitator in these tumors. These real-world data provide a strong genomic rationale for biomarker-agnostic ADC strategies (targeting HER3 protein expression) rather than mutation-specific approaches in most ERBB3-altered solid tumors.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (10)
Minsuk Kwon
Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
Yunjin Go
Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
Ji Eun Shin
Sung Hee Lim
Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
Jung Yong Hong
Jeeyun Lee
Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
Se Hoon Park
Joon Oh Park
Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
Young Suk Park
Seung Tae Kim