Genomic determinants of response and resistance to pirtobrutinib in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Abstract
Abstract Pirtobrutinib, a noncovalent, reversible Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), demonstrated efficacy in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), resistant to covalent BTKi (cBTKi). We analyzed genomic correlations with response and resistance to pirtobrutinib in relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients with CLL pretreated with cBTKi enrolled in the phase 1/2 BRUIN trial. DNA sequencing was performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells at baseline, on treatment, and at progressive disease (PD). Common alterations at baseline included mutations in BTK (43%), TP53 (38%), SF3B1 (25%), NOTCH1 (23%), ATM (19%), XPO1 (11%), PLCG2 (9%), BCL2 (8%), and 17p deletion (28%). Common baseline BTK mutations included C481S (85%), C481R (10%), C481F (6%), and C481Y (4%). At PD, 60 of 88 patients (68%) acquired ≥1 mutation, including 44% with acquired BTK mutations and 24% with other acquired mutations. A total of 55 acquired BTK mutations were detected in 39 patients, including gatekeeper mutations (T474I/F/S/Y/L, 26%), kinase-impaired L528W (16%), C481S/R/Y (5%), V416L (2%), and A428D (1%) and others proximal to the adenosine triphosphate–binding pocket, D539A/G/H (1%) and Y545N (1%). Decrease or complete clearance of BTK C481x was observed at PD in 36 of 43 patients (84%). Using a more sensitive assay, 37% (18/49) of acquired BTK mutations were detected at baseline at low allele frequency. Using a highly sensitive assay at progression, a similar frequency of acquired BTK mutations (39%) was detected, and all patients had detectable acquired mutations. This study highlights the complex clonal dynamics of BTK mutations in patients with R/R CLL undergoing pirtobrutinib treatment, and the extent of resistance without an obvious genomic driver. Trial registration: #NCT03740529 at www.ClinicalTrials.gov.
Article Details
Authors (27)
Jennifer R. Brown
Bastien Nguyen
2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN
Sai Prasad Desikan
3Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Helen Won
2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN
Shady I. Tantawy
4Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
Samuel C. McNeely
Narasimha Marella
2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN
Hetal S. Randeria
2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN
Lauren M. Hanson
2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN
Andrew Parker
Salomé Calado Botelho
2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN
Jennifer A. Woyach
5Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
Krish Patel
C. U. Shah Medical College, Surendranagar, India
Constantine S. Tam
40Department of Haematology, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Toby A. Eyre
8Department of Hematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Churchill Cancer Center, Oxford, United Kingdom
Chan Y. Cheah
12Department of Haematology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
Nirav N. Shah
Medical College of Wisconsin
Paolo Ghia
School of Medicine, Università Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan
Wojciech Jurczak
Minna Balbas
2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN
Binoj Nair
2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN
Paolo Abada
2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN
Chunxiao Wang
Denise Wang
2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN
Lindsey E. Roeker
15Department of Hematology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Varsha Gandhi
16Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
William G. Wierda
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States