Genomic and clinical correlates of belzutifan treatment in renal cell carcinoma (RCC): A retrospective analysis of 150 RCC patients.
Abstract
4541 Background: Belzutifan is a hypoxia-inducible factor-2α (HIF-2α) inhibitor approved for RCC that targets a central driver in RCC pathogenesis; however, predictive biomarkers of response remain poorly defined. Methods: Comprehensive DNA (592-gene panel or whole exome) and RNA (whole transcriptome) sequencing were performed by Caris Life Sciences on RCC samples. Clear cell RCC and RCC-NOS with VHL mutations were included. Belzutifan time on treatment (ToT) was derived from insurance claims, and patients were classified as responders or non-responders using the median ToT. Results: A total of 150 belzutifan-treated RCC tumors were included in the analysis, of which 29% were primary kidney tumors and the remainder were from metastatic sites. The study population was classified as responders (n=57) or non-responders (n=93) using a median time on treatment of 85 days (95% CI: 71–114). Baseline characteristics were similar, except responders were younger (median age 57 vs 64 years, p=0.007). Transcriptomic analysis showed similar HIF-2α (median 7.78 vs 7.61) and CA9 (4.82 vs 4.54) expression between responders and non-responders without statistical significance. Responders showed enrichment of PTEN (15.8% vs. 3.3%, p=0.03) and PIK3R1 alterations (7.0% vs. 0.0%, p=0.04). Responders demonstrated numerically higher frequencies of PBRM1 (54.4% vs. 44.3%, p=0.46) and PIK3CA mutations (8.8% vs. 3.3%, p=0.24). Alterations in DNA damage response genes were also numerically more common among responders, including TP53 (14.0% vs. 4.9%, p=0.11) and ATM (3.5% vs. 1.6%, p=0.56), although none of these differences reached statistical significance. In contrast, non-responders exhibited numerically higher frequencies of BAP1 (18.0% vs. 8.8%, p=0.10), SETD2 (26.2% vs. 19.3%, p=0.27), and ARID1A (5.1% vs. 1.8%, p=0.30), all of which were also not statistically significant. Conclusions: HIF2-α RNA expression alone does not predict belzutifan response in RCC. Responders demonstrated alterations in PBRM1, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, and DNA damage response genes, while non-responders showed numerically higher frequencies of chromatin remodeling mutations including BAP1 and SETD2. Study limitation included small sample size and short follow-up. Larger datasets are required to validate these findings.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (17)
Harshitha Reddy Dudipala
Department of Medicine, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA
Yu-Wei Chen
Department of Medicine, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA
Shayan S. Nazari
Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ
Andrew Elliott
Ninad Kulkarni
Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ
Rashad Nawfal
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
Liliana Ascione
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
Marc Machaalani
David F. McDermott
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA
Sabina Signoretti
Pedro C. Barata
Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA
Brent S. Rose
Aditya Bagrodia
UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, 92093
Neeraj Agarwal
Division of Medical Oncology Department of Internal Medicine Huntsman Cancer Institute University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA
Sumanta Kumar Pal
Department of Medical Oncology City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center Duarte California USA
Toni K. Choueiri
Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA
Rana R. McKay
Department of Medicine, Urology, and Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences University of California‐San Diego La Jolla California USA