Fuzuloparib combined with abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AA-P) as first-line (1L) treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Interim results from the FUZUPRO trial.

D Dingwei Ye (Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai) H Hua Xu (State Key Laboratory of Gene Function and Modulation Research, School of Life Sciences, and Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center, Peking University) M Mariusz Kwiatkowski C Chaochao Liang (The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China) J José Ángel Arranz Arija S Shusuan Jiang (Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China) Y Young Seuk Choi (Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Soeul, South Korea) T Tie Chong (The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China) C Chaohong He J Jiwen Cheng H Hongqian Guo T Thean Hsiang Tan (Icon Cancer Centre Kurralta Park, Kurralta Park, Australia) J Jae Young Joung (National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea) S Sung Kyu Hong T Ting Sung (The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China) B Begoña P. Valderrama (Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain) T Tomas Buchler Y Yiwen Wu (Department of Neurology & Institute of Neurology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine) F Fan Liang W Wenliang Wang

Abstract

5008 Background: The combination of PARP inhibitors with standard AA-P may offer enhanced antitumor activity over AA-P. We conducted FUZUPRO, an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial, to compare the efficacy of fuzuloparib, a novel PARP inhibitor, plus AA-P vs AA-P as 1L treatment for mCRPC. Methods: 1L mCRPC patients were randomized (1:1) to orally receive fuzuloparib 150 mg BID plus AA-P (abiraterone acetate 1000 mg QD; prednisone 5 mg BID) or placebo plus AA-P. Randomization was stratified by DNA-repair gene defect (DRD) status (positive vs negative/unknown) and other factors. Primary endpoint was blinded independent central review (BICR)-assessed radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) per RECIST v1.1 and PCWG3. As of March 23, 2025, 259 (85% of total expected) BICR-assessed rPFS events occurred, and a prespecified interim analysis was conducted. Results: 496 patients were randomized to fuzuloparib-AA-P (n = 249) or AA-P (n = 247). Median follow-up was 33.3 mo. Fuzuloparib-AA-P significantly prolonged rPFS compared with AA-P (median, 24.8 mo vs 19.9 mo; HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.55-0.91; 1-sided p = 0.0034). rPFS benefit with fuzuloparib-AA-P was generally consistent across clinically relevant subgroups. Among DRD-positive patients (n = 116), median rPFS was 27.7 mo and 13.9 mo in the fuzuloparib-AA-P and AA-P groups, respectively (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.31-0.85; 1-sided p = 0.0039). Subgroup analysis suggested improved rPFS among DRD-positive patients regardless of their BRCA1/2 mutation status. Among DRD-negative/unknown patients (n = 380), median rPFS was 22.8 and 21.2 mo, respectively. Overall survival showed a benefit trend in favor of fuzuloparib-AA-P (Table). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported by 81.9% and 76.0% of patients in the two groups, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 TRAEs were mainly hematological toxicities, including anemia (20.1%), decreased white blood cell count (5.6%), decreased platelet count, and decreased neutrophil count (5.2% for each). Conclusions: Fuzuloparib plus AA-P as 1L treatment significantly prolonged rPFS in patients with mCRPC. The combination showed acceptable safety and tolerability with no new safety signals identified. Clinical trial information: NCT04691804 . Overall DRD-positive DRD-negative/unknown Fuzuloparib-AA-P(N = 249) AA-P (N = 247) Fuzuloparib-AA-P (N = 60) AA-P (N = 56) Fuzuloparib-AA-P (N = 189) AA-P (N = 191) rPFS, mo, median (95% CI) 24.8 (20.4, 30.4) 19.9 (15.2, 22.2) 27.7 (17.7, NR) 13.9 (8.3, 24.9) 22.8 (19.9, 30.2) 21.2 (16.5, 24.6) HR (95% CI), vs. AA-P 0.71 (0.55, 0.91) 0.51 (0.31, 0.85) 0.81 (0.61, 1.08) Overall survival, mo, median (95% CI) 41.9 (31.1, NR) 36.8 (28.7, NR) NR (27.0, NR) 36.8 (24.7, 40.3) 37.3 (29.0, NR) 36.8 (28.7, NR) HR (95% CI), vs. AA-P 0.96 (0.73, 1.24) 0.76 (0.44, 1.32) 1.00 (0.74, 1.35) NR, not reached.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 5008-5008
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

D

Dingwei Ye

Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai

H

Hua Xu

State Key Laboratory of Gene Function and Modulation Research, School of Life Sciences, and Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center, Peking University

M

Mariusz Kwiatkowski

C

Chaochao Liang

The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China

J

José Ángel Arranz Arija

S

Shusuan Jiang

Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China

Y

Young Seuk Choi

Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Soeul, South Korea

T

Tie Chong

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China

C

Chaohong He

J

Jiwen Cheng

H

Hongqian Guo

T

Thean Hsiang Tan

Icon Cancer Centre Kurralta Park, Kurralta Park, Australia

J

Jae Young Joung

National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea

S

Sung Kyu Hong

T

Ting Sung

The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China

B

Begoña P. Valderrama

Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain

T

Tomas Buchler

Y

Yiwen Wu

Department of Neurology & Institute of Neurology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine

F

Fan Liang

W

Wenliang Wang