Fusion oncoproteins and cooperating mutations define disease phenotypes in <i>NUP98</i> -rearranged leukemia
Abstract
Abstract Leukemias with NUP98 rearrangements exhibit heterogeneous phenotypes such as acute myeloid leukemia, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), or myelodysplastic syndrome/neoplasms associated with fusion partners, whereas the mechanism responsible for this heterogeneity is poorly understood. Through genome-wide mutational and transcriptional analyses of 177 NUP98-rearranged leukemias, we show that cooperating alterations are associated with differentiation status even among leukemias sharing the same NUP98 fusions, such as NUP98::KDM5A acute megakaryocytic leukemia with RB1 loss or T-ALL with NOTCH1 mutations. CUT&RUN profiling of in vitro cord blood CD34+ cell (cbCD34) models of major NUP98 fusions revealed that NUP98-fusion oncoproteins (FOs) directly regulate differentiation-related genes contributing to the disease phenotypes, represented by NUP98::KDM5A binding to MEIS2 or GFI1B for megakaryocyte (MK) differentiation. In patient samples, NUP98-FO binding patterns are heterogeneous, potentially shaped by somatic mutations and differentiation status. Using cbCD34 models and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing, we show that RB1 loss cooperates with NUP98::KDM5A by blocking terminal differentiation toward platelets and expanding MK-like cells, whereas WT1 frameshift mutations skew differentiation toward dormant lymphoid-myeloid primed progenitor cells and cycling granulocyte-monocyte progenitor cells, providing evidence for NUP98-rearranged leukemia phenotypes affected by cooperating alterations. NUP98::KDM5A cbCD34 models with RB1 or WT1 alterations have different sensitivities to menin inhibition, suggesting that cellular differentiation provides stage-specific menin dependencies and resistance mechanisms that can be leveraged for future treatment strategies for NUP98-rearranged leukemia.
Article Details
Authors (27)
Masayuki Umeda
1St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Department of Pathology, Memphis, United States
Ryan Hiltenbrand
1St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Pathology, Memphis, United States
Nicole L. Michmerhuizen
1Department of Pathology, St. Jude Children’s Hospital, Memphis, TN
Juan M. Barajas
1Department of Pathology, St. Jude Children’s Hospital, Memphis, TN
Melvin E. Thomas III
1Department of Pathology, St. Jude Children’s Hospital, Memphis, TN
Bright Arthur
1Department of Pathology, St. Jude Children’s Hospital, Memphis, TN
Michael P. Walsh
Guangchun Song
Key Laboratory of Agro-products Quality and Safety Control in Storage and Transport Process, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs
Jing Ma
State Key Laboratory of Coordination Chemistry, School of Chemistry
Tamara Westover
1St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
Amit Kumar
Petri Pölönen
Cristina Mecucci
2Laboratory of Molecular Medicine, Centro di Ricerca Emato-Oncologico, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital and Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
Danika Di Giacomo
1Department of Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
Franco Locatelli
IRCCS Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù Rome, Rome
Riccardo Masetti
Salvatore N. Bertuccio
9Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Azienda Ospedaliero di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Martina Pigazzi
Shondra M. Pruett-Miller
Stanley Pounds
Jeffrey Rubnitz
5Menarini Stemline, New York, United States
Hiroto Inaba
Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos
South Texas Accelerated Research Therapeutics, San Antonio
Michael J. Wick
15XenoSTART, The START Center for Cancer Research, San Antonio, TX
Ilaria Iacobucci
2Department of Pathology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
Charles G. Mullighan
Jeffery M. Klco
1Department of Pathology, St. Jude Children’s Hospital, Memphis, TN