Fruquintinib plus best supportive care for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Characterization of patients who had an overall survival of ≥10 months in the FRESCO-2 study.

S Stefan Kasper (Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany) A Andrea Sartore-Bianchi V Violaine Randrian (CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France) C Chiara Cremolini D Dirk Arnold (Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg, Germany) A Arvind Dasari (M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston) C Cathy Eng (Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville) S Sara Lonardi E Elena Elez (Vall d’Hebron Hospital Campus, Barcelona) T Takayuki Yoshino (National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan) A Alberto F. Sobrero (IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Metropolitana - Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy) J James C. Yao H Howard S. Hochster (Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ) E Eric Van Cutsem (University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium) D David Tougeron (Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France) Z Ziji Yu (Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. (TDCA), Cambridge, MA) C Cynthia Dong (Washington University in St. Louis Medical School, St. Louis, MO) W William R. Schelman (HUTCHMED, Florham Park, NJ) F François Ghiringhelli

Abstract

142 Background: Fruquintinib (F) is a highly selective, oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of all 3 vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs -1, -2, -3) that is approved by the US FDA and in the EU, UK, and Japan for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), regardless of biomarker status. FRESCO-2 (NCT04322539) met its primary endpoint demonstrating significantly improved overall survival (OS) with F + best supportive care (BSC) vs placebo (P) + BSC. This subgroup analysis assessed landmark survival of all FRESCO-2 patients (pts), and baseline (BL) characteristics and safety data of pts treated with F who had OS ≥10 months (mos) compared with the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (pop). Methods: Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive F 5 mg or matching P, by mouth, once daily, 3 weeks on, 1 week off, + BSC. Pts had received prior chemotherapy, anti-VEGF therapy and, if RAS wild type, anti-EGFR therapy; and had prior exposure to trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) and/or regorafenib. The hazard ratio (HR) between the two treatment arms was calculated from a stratified Cox proportional hazard model with treatment group as the only covariate in the model. Results: In the ITT pop, OS was improved with F vs P (HR 0.66); OS rates (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) at 6 and 9 mos were 60.4% (55.9–64.9) vs 41.5% (35.0–48.0) and 41.1% (36.4–45.8) vs 28.2% (22.1–34.3), respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) rates (95% CIs) at 6 and 9 mos were 23.8% (19.7–28.0) vs 1.1% (0–2.6) and 11.3% (8.1–14.6) vs 0.5% (0–1.6), respectively. Of 461 pts who received F, 113 (24.5%) had OS ≥10 mos (range 10.0–18.9) with a median duration of F treatment of 6.3 mos (range 0.7–19.1). Among pts receiving F, a higher proportion (≥10% difference) of pts with OS ≥10 mos had no liver metastases (mets) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 at BL compared with the ITT pop (Table). In pts with OS ≥10 mos, 61.9% experienced a grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse event compared with 62.7% in the ITT pop. Conclusions: Longer-term OS and PFS rates at 6 and 9 mos were higher with F vs P in the FRESCO-2 ITT pop. The data show a higher proportion of pts with OS ≥10 mos had an absence of liver mets and ECOG PS 0 at BL than the ITT pop. The safety profile of F in pts with OS ≥10 mos was consistent with the ITT pop. Clinical trial information: NCT04322539 . BL characteristics of pts treated with F with OS ≥10 mos vs ITT pop. BL characteristic Pts with OS ≥10 mos (n=113) ITT pop(n=461) ECOG PS (0 / 1), % 54.0 / 46.0 42.5 / 57.5 Median time since 1 st CRC diagnosis, mos 52.0 47.2 Primary tumor location at 1 st diagnosis (colon / rectum / both), % 51.3 / 35.4 / 13.3 60.5 / 31.0 / 8.5 Primary site at 1 st diagnosis (colon left / colon right), % 42.5 / 15.9 41.6 / 21.0 Liver mets, % 58.4 73.5 Median duration of mCRC, mos 42.7 37.9 Prior lines of therapy for mCRC (≤3 / >3), % 26.5 / 73.5 27.1 / 72.9 Prior TAS-102, % 46.9 52.1 Prior regorafenib, % 12.4 8.7

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 4_suppl
Published February 01, 2025
Pages 142-142
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (19)

S

Stefan Kasper

Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany

A

Andrea Sartore-Bianchi

V

Violaine Randrian

CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France

C

Chiara Cremolini

D

Dirk Arnold

Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg, Germany

A

Arvind Dasari

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston

C

Cathy Eng

Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville

S

Sara Lonardi

E

Elena Elez

Vall d’Hebron Hospital Campus, Barcelona

T

Takayuki Yoshino

National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan

A

Alberto F. Sobrero

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Metropolitana - Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy

J

James C. Yao

H

Howard S. Hochster

Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ

E

Eric Van Cutsem

University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium

D

David Tougeron

Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France

Z

Ziji Yu

Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. (TDCA), Cambridge, MA

C

Cynthia Dong

Washington University in St. Louis Medical School, St. Louis, MO

W

William R. Schelman

HUTCHMED, Florham Park, NJ

F

François Ghiringhelli