Fried's frailty phenotype predicts survival in pts with relapsed/refractory lymphoma or myeloma undergoing chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy – a prospective, observational Study

N Nikita Dave (12University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, United States) S Shannon Gier (1Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Philadelphia, United States) M Marni Kessler (1Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Philadelphia, United States) M Miguel Rodriguez (1Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Philadelphia, United States) S Stefan Barta (25University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States) E Elise Chong (17Lymphoma Program, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States) A Adam Cohen (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia) N Noelle Frey (Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology–Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia) S Saar Gill (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia) S Shannon Heck (2Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Physical Therapy, Philadelphia, United States) E Elizabeth Hexner (Cell Therapy and Transplant Program, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia) N Nasheed Hossain (2University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States) S Shivani Kapur (1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Philadelphia, United States) D Daniel Landsburg (12University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, United States) A Alison Loren (24University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, United States) S Selina Luger (14University of Pennsylvania/ Abrahmson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, United States) M Mary Ellen Martin (3University of Pennsylvania, Cell Therapy and Transplant Program, Philadelphia, United States) P Pashna Munshi (1MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Stem Cell Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy Program, Washington, United States) S Sunita Dwivedy Nasta (1Lymphoma Program, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States) A Alexander Perl (7University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States) D David Porter (Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand) S Stephen Schuster (3Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Philadelphia, United States) E Edward Stadtmauer (1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Philadelphia, United States) S Sandra Susanibar-Adaniya (1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Philadelphia, United States) J Jakub Svoboda (Institute of Science and Technology Austria) A Abby Togliatii (2Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Physical Therapy, Philadelphia, United States) D Dan Vogl (1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Philadelphia, United States) A Adam Waxman (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States) D Daniel Wu (2Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Physical Therapy, Philadelphia, United States) S Shannon McCurdy (4Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States)

Abstract

Abstract Chimeric antigen T-cell receptor (CART) therapy is highly effective for pts (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) lymphoma/multiple myeloma (MM). However, due to concerns regarding tolerability, older pts are underrepresented in CART trials and real-world studies indicate that CART is underutilized in older adults. Methods to assess fitness for CART are ECOG, clinician gestalt and age. There is interest in improving risk stratification of older adults using objective measures. Fried's frailty phenotype (FP) uses subjective (exhaustion, reported weight loss, activity level) and objective (gait speed, grip strength) measures to categorize pts into fit, pre-frail, and frail. We have previously shown that FP predicts for overall survival (OS) in older stem cell transplant (SCT) recipients. We hypothesize that FP will be associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in older pts with lymphoma/MM undergoing CART therapy. We prospectively enrolled pts ≥ 60 years planned for CART for R/R lymphoma/MM from May 2019 – 2023 on a clinical trial. We performed FP prior to CART infusion, and at 7 days (d), 14d, 21d, 1 month (mo), 3mo, 6mo and 12mo post-infusion. 36 pts were enrolled with a median age at CART infusion of 69 years (Range 60-81). 53% of pts had MM, of whom 63% had intermediate or high-risk disease by R-ISS. The remainder had lymphoma (diffuse large B-cell or follicular lymphoma) with IPI > 2 at diagnosis in 59%. Idecagtagene vicleucel and tisagenlecleucel were the most frequently administered CART products. Median follow up was 33mo. Median prior lines of therapy (LOT) was 3 (Range 1-7) and 47% had prior auto-SCT. Pre-infusion, majority had low ECOG scores (0-1, 81%), including 71% categorized as frail by FP. At pre-infusion FP, 35% of pts were fit (score 0), 44% were prefrail (score 1-2) and 21% were frail (score 3-5). Frail pts were more likely to be admitted for >7d for their CART infusion (OR 7.0, 95% CI 1.02-47.97, p=0.04). Frailty was not associated with risk of CRS, ICANS or 30-day hospital readmission. 13 pts had died by the time of analysis; all but 2 deaths were related to progressive disease. 2 non-disease related deaths were 1 death from COVID and 1 ICANS-related death from teclistamab after relapse 1 year and 2 years after infusion, respectively. At Day 21 post-infusion, 21% were fit, 57% were prefrail, and 21% were frail. At 1mo post-infusion, 25% were fit, 63% were prefrail, and 13% were frail. Being frail by FP at pre-infusion (p<0.001), Day 21 (p=0.03) or 1 month (p=0.009) post-infusion was associated with inferior OS from that time point. Median PFS in pre-infusion fit, prefrail, and frail pts were 23.4mo (95% CI 17.1-NR), 18.4mo (95% CI 6.8-13.8) and 4.0mo (95% CI 2.5-8.4), respectively. 2-year OS estimates were 100%, 93% and 14%, in fit, prefrail and frail pts respectively. 14 of 36 pts maintained or improved their FP from pre-infusion to 1mo; all but 3 received physical therapy (PT) while in hospital with 5 pts continuing PT outpatient. Notably, pts who maintained or improved their FP from pre-infusion to 1mo post-infusion had significantly better OS (p=0.05) than pts who had declines in their scores. Along with pre-infusion, day 21 and 1mo post-infusion FP scores, LDH (Mean 182 U/L) at the time of CART infusion was significantly associated with OS in the univariate Cox proportional hazards model (HR 5.22, 95% CI 1.43-19.18, p=0.013). Several factors including disease type, number of prior lines of therapy, use of bridging, stage at CART, IPI/RISS at diagnosis, HCT-CI, ECOG, presence of extra-nodal disease, CRS, ICANS, gender, age by decade, and BMI did not correlate with outcome. In pts ≥ 60 with R/R lymphoma/MM undergoing CART, 21% were frail by FP prior to CART. Frailty by FP pre-infusion, day 21 and 1mo post-infusion was associated with inferior OS as opposed to ECOG, HCT-CI, age or several disease related risk factors. FP may improve risk stratification in older adults undergoing CART. Pts with improvement in FP within 1mo post-infusion also had better outcomes. While better disease control could contribute to improved FP scores, most pts received PT to reverse frailty. Our future work aims to implement an exercise regimen to improve outcomes and to determine whether frailty is associated with adverse disease biology. Future work to uncover biologic mechanisms of frailty and adverse disease biology may identify novel targets for intervention to improve outcomes for frail pts.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 7189-7189
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (30)

N

Nikita Dave

12University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, United States

S

Shannon Gier

1Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Philadelphia, United States

M

Marni Kessler

1Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Philadelphia, United States

M

Miguel Rodriguez

1Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Philadelphia, United States

S

Stefan Barta

25University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States

E

Elise Chong

17Lymphoma Program, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States

A

Adam Cohen

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

N

Noelle Frey

Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology–Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

S

Saar Gill

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

S

Shannon Heck

2Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Physical Therapy, Philadelphia, United States

E

Elizabeth Hexner

Cell Therapy and Transplant Program, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

N

Nasheed Hossain

2University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States

S

Shivani Kapur

1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Philadelphia, United States

D

Daniel Landsburg

12University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, United States

A

Alison Loren

24University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, United States

S

Selina Luger

14University of Pennsylvania/ Abrahmson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, United States

M

Mary Ellen Martin

3University of Pennsylvania, Cell Therapy and Transplant Program, Philadelphia, United States

P

Pashna Munshi

1MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Stem Cell Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy Program, Washington, United States

S

Sunita Dwivedy Nasta

1Lymphoma Program, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States

A

Alexander Perl

7University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States

D

David Porter

Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand

S

Stephen Schuster

3Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Philadelphia, United States

E

Edward Stadtmauer

1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Philadelphia, United States

S

Sandra Susanibar-Adaniya

1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Philadelphia, United States

J

Jakub Svoboda

Institute of Science and Technology Austria

A

Abby Togliatii

2Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Physical Therapy, Philadelphia, United States

D

Dan Vogl

1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Philadelphia, United States

A

Adam Waxman

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

D

Daniel Wu

2Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Physical Therapy, Philadelphia, United States

S

Shannon McCurdy

4Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States