Forest recovery pathways after fire, drought, and windstorms in southeastern Amazonia

L Leandro Maracahipes (Yale School of the Environment, Yale University) P Paulo M. Brando (Yale School of the Environment, Yale University) D Divino V. Silvério (Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia) L Leonardo Maracahipes-Santos (Yale School of the Environment, Yale University) A Antônio C. Silveiro (Diretoria de Ciências, Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia, Canarana) L Larissa Verona (Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas) M Marcia N. Macedo (Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology, Columbia University) S Susan Trumbore (Department Biogeochemical Processes, Max-Planck-Institute for Biogeochemistry) E Eddie Lenza (Faculdade de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso) B Bela Starinchak (Yale School of the Environment, Yale University) N Nathalia Potter (Yale School of the Environment, Yale University) D David Herrera-Ramírez (Yale School of the Environment, Yale University) F Fernanda de V. Barros (College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter) M Maria del Rosario Uribe (Yale School of the Environment, Yale University) L Lachlan Byrnes (Yale School of the Environment, Yale University) A André F. A. Andrade (Diretoria de Ciências, Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia, Canarana) E Elisangela X. Rocha (Diretoria de Ciências, Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia, Canarana) L Ludmila Rattis (Diretoria de Ciências, Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia, Canarana) T Taynã F. Nunes (Faculdade de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso) R Rafael S. Oliveira (Department of Plant Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas)

Abstract

The future of tropical forests depends on their ability to resist and recover from multiple disturbances. Here, we evaluated how edge effects, experimental fires, extreme droughts, and blowdowns reshaped forest structure, composition, and functional traits over two decades in the Amazon–Cerrado transition. Initially, forests resisted low-intensity fires, but subsequent high-intensity fires during severe droughts sharply increased susceptibility to further disturbances. Along forest edges bordering agriculture, these compound disturbances drove losses of tree species richness, declines in Amazonian forest-specialist species, and shifts toward generalists with broad distributions, indicating increased compositional homogenization (i.e., reduced taxonomic diversity and dominance of generalist species). Once fires ceased, recovery trajectories diverged: Interior forests rapidly regained woody species richness and composition, whereas edge forests recovered more slowly. During postfire recovery, embolism-resistant species (lower P50 values) became more common, yet communities exhibited lower hydraulic safety margins (increased vulnerability to drought). At the same time, generalist species remained abundant, forest-specialist declined, and only a single woody species typical of savanna was established. Although grasses initially colonized fire-altered edges—especially light-demanding exotic Andropogon gayanus —they declined once fires stopped, leaving only small patches of shade-tolerant C3 species. Consequently, we find little evidence that fire-degraded forests transition toward persistent savanna, although recurrent fires or future climatic changes could drive long-lasting degradation or human-derived savannas. Together, these results show that even highly degraded, grass-invaded forests can recover in the absence of new disturbances, but the communities that reassemble remain vulnerable to renewed fire, drought, or windthrow.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 123, Issue 17
Published April 28, 2026
ISSN 0027-8424
Publisher National Academy of Sciences

Authors (20)

L

Leandro Maracahipes

Yale School of the Environment, Yale University

P

Paulo M. Brando

Yale School of the Environment, Yale University

D

Divino V. Silvério

Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia

L

Leonardo Maracahipes-Santos

Yale School of the Environment, Yale University

A

Antônio C. Silveiro

Diretoria de Ciências, Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia, Canarana

L

Larissa Verona

Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas

M

Marcia N. Macedo

Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology, Columbia University

S

Susan Trumbore

Department Biogeochemical Processes, Max-Planck-Institute for Biogeochemistry

E

Eddie Lenza

Faculdade de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso

B

Bela Starinchak

Yale School of the Environment, Yale University

N

Nathalia Potter

Yale School of the Environment, Yale University

D

David Herrera-Ramírez

Yale School of the Environment, Yale University

F

Fernanda de V. Barros

College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter

M

Maria del Rosario Uribe

Yale School of the Environment, Yale University

L

Lachlan Byrnes

Yale School of the Environment, Yale University

A

André F. A. Andrade

Diretoria de Ciências, Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia, Canarana

E

Elisangela X. Rocha

Diretoria de Ciências, Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia, Canarana

L

Ludmila Rattis

Diretoria de Ciências, Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia, Canarana

T

Taynã F. Nunes

Faculdade de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso

R

Rafael S. Oliveira

Department of Plant Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas