FOLFIRINOX vs gem/pac in the elderly: Is the survival benefit worth the risk?
Abstract
e16420 Background: FOLFIRINOX (FFX) is standard first-line therapy for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) but is often avoided in elderly patients due to toxicity concerns, with Gemcitabine plus Nab-Paclitaxel (GP) frequently preferred. Comparative real-world data on survival and healthcare utilization (HCU) in elderly patients are limited. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX Global Health Research Network. Patients aged ≥75 years with mPDAC treated with first-line FFX or GP through January 15, 2026 were identified. Propensity score matching (1:1 greedy nearest-neighbor, caliper 0.1) balanced baseline characteristics. Outcomes included 1-year overall survival (OS), 90-day safety events, and 90-day HCU. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with CA19-9 > 1000 U/mL. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank tests were used. Results: A total of 970 matched patients were included (485 per group). FFX was associated with improved 1-year OS compared with GP (57.1% vs 48.5%, p = 0.02). Median OS was not reached in the FFX group versus 11.7 months with GP. The hazard ratio for 1-year mortality favored FFX (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.65–0.96) but was not statistically significant. No significant differences were observed in 90-day safety or HCU. Sepsis/septic shock occurred less frequently with FFX (8.2% vs 11.1%, p = 0.13). Hospitalization (35.3% vs 34.8%) and ICU admission (7.6% vs 5.8%) rates were similar. Among patients with CA19-9 > 1000, safety, HCU outcomes, and OS similarly favored FFX without increased toxicity. Conclusions: In elderly patients with mPDAC, first-line FOLFIRINOX was associated with improved survival without increased short-term toxicity or healthcare utilization, even among those with poor prognostic CA19-9 levels. These findings support FFX as a viable option for carefully selected elderly patients, though lack of functional status matching suggests possible selection of fitter individuals. Outcome FOLFIRINOX cohort (n=485) (purple) Gem/ Pac cohort (n= 485) (green) Hazard Ratio/ Risk Ratio (95% CI) p-value 1- year Overall Survival 0.79 (0.65 – 0.96) 0.66 Deceased 180 215 Survival Probability 57.1% 48.5% 0.02 Median Survival Not reached 11.7 months 90-day healthcare utilization Any hospitalization 171 (35.3%) 169 (34.8%) 1.012 (0.853, 1.201) 0.89 ICU admission 37 (7.6%) 28 (5.8%) 1.321 (0.822, 2.124) 0.25 90-daysafety outcomes Sepsis/ Severe Sepsis/ Septic shock 40 (8.2%) 54 (11.1%) 0.741 (0.502, 1.093) 0.13 Survivability CA19-9>1000 U/ml cohort FOLFORNIOX(n 109) 1 year survival %: 60.1 Gem/Pac (n 109) 1 year survival %: 44.3% **Hazard ratio 0.64 (0.43-0.95) 0.024
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (6)
Omar Sey
SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
Ansy Patel
2SUNY Upstate University, Department of Internal Medicine, Syracuse, United States
Anupa Rani Mandava
SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
Nour Sabiha Naji
SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
Shruti Shah
Merima Ramovic-Zobic
SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY