Fixed low-dose nab-paclitaxel with tislelizumab in non-metastatic bladder cancer: A post-hoc analysis of dose expose in TRUCE-01 and TRUCE-02 trials.
Abstract
768 Background: Although PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (PD-1 ICIs) show efficacy in bladder cancer, exploring effective immunomodulatory strategies remains necessary. Nab-paclitaxel has demonstrated immunomodulatory properties that may enhance the effectiveness of PD-1 ICIs. Herein, we conducted a post-hoc analysis of two phase II trials conducted in our centre to evaluate whether body surface area (BSA)–adjusted exposure to fixed low-dose nab-paclitaxel affects efficacy or safety when combined with tislelizumab, a type of PD-1 ICIs. Methods: Patients (pts) with non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) or very high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) from the TRUCE-01 (NCT04730219) and TRUCE-02 (NCT04730232) trials were included. All pts received ≥3 cycles of tislelizumab (200 mg iv Q3W) plus fixed-dose nab-paclitaxel (200 mg iv Q3W). The nab-paclitaxel dose per m² (NP-DPM) was calculated as 200 mg divided by BSA (Mosteller formula). Pts were grouped by NP-DPM tertiles: low ( < 102 mg/m²), medium (102–117 mg/m²), and high ( > 117 mg/m²). The primary endpoint was complete response (CR, defined as no residual tumor on pathology). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and nab-paclitaxel–related adverse events (NPRAEs). Results: Of 106 evaluable patients we finally included, the median NP-DPM was 106 mg/m² (IQR 102–117). The CR rates were 63.0%, 56.6%, and 57.7% in the low-, medium-, and high-dose groups, respectively (p = 0.902), with no significant differences within MIBC or NMIBC subgroups. At a median follow-up of 34.4 months, no significant differences were observed in OS (p = 0.051), MFS (p = 0.216), or CSS (p = 0.112) among different NP-DPM groups. Peripheral sensory neuropathy was the only NPRAEs that significantly increased with NP-DPM (0% vs 3.8% vs 19.2%, p = 0.009). Other NPRAEs (alopecia, fatigue, cytopenias) did not differ between groups. Conclusions: Fixed low-dose nab-paclitaxel combined with tislelizumab achieved robust and consistent responses across BSA-based exposure groups, with a favourable safety profile. These results support further evaluation of this chemotherapy–immunotherapy combination as a potential treatment strategy for non-metastatic bladder cancer.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (11)
Hailong Hu
Houyuan Chen
Yunkai Qie
Zhouliang Wu
Yuda Lin
Qinliang Si
The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
Zihan Xue
The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
Shaobo Yang
Kaipeng Jia
Ning Kang
Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Translational Neuromedicine, University of Rochester Medical Center
Chong Shen