Fixed-duration VenO vs FCR/BR in fit patients with untreated CLL: primary analysis of the phase 3 CRISTALLO trial
Abstract
Abstract The phase 3 CRISTALLO trial compared first-line fixed-duration venetoclax-obinutuzumab (VenO) vs fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR)/bendamustine-rituximab (BR) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), using undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) as the sole primary end point. Previously untreated patients with a cumulative illness rating scale score ≤6 and creatinine clearance ≥70 mL/min without del(17p)/TP53 mutations were randomized 1:1 to VenO or FCR/BR. The primary end point was uMRD (<10−4) in peripheral blood (PB) using next-generation sequencing at month 15. Key secondary end points included uMRD (<10−4) in PB and bone marrow (BM) at end of treatment (EOT) and progression-free survival (PFS). uMRD at deeper cutoffs were explored. At data cutoff (19 March 2024), 80 patients received VenO, and 86 received FCR/BR. Baseline characteristics were generally balanced across arms. The primary end point was met: 81.3% (VenO) and 54.7% (FCR/BR) achieved uMRD (<10−4) in PB at month 15 (P = .0004). uMRD (<10−4) in PB and BM at EOT was also higher with VenO vs FCR/BR. Short follow-up precluded evaluation of PFS at the first planned interim analysis; however, fewer patients progressed/died with VenO vs FCR/BR (7 vs 13). At month 15, 65.0% (VenO) and 25.6% (FCR/BR) achieved uMRD (<10−6) in PB. The overall safety profile was consistent with the known safety profile of each drug. No patient in the VenO arm was deemed high risk for tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) after obinutuzumab debulking; no clinical TLS occurred. These results confirm and extend the findings from the GAIA-CLL13 trial, validating increased depth of response with VenO vs chemoimmunotherapies. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04285567.
Article Details
Authors (18)
Jeff P. Sharman
1Willamette Valley Cancer Institute, Sarah Cannon Research, Eugene, OR
Luca Laurenti
2Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy
Emmanuelle Ferrant
3Department of Hematology, Hôpital Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France
Luis Felipe Casado Montero
4Hospital General Universitario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
Stephen P. Mulligan
5Department of Haematology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Rosemary Harrup
6Cancer and Blood Services, Royal Hobart Hospital and University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
Stephen Opat
7Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Adalberto Ibatici
8Division of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
Roberto Marasca
9Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Hematology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
Paolo Sportoletti
Department of Medicine and Surgery, Institute of Hematology and Center for Hemato-Oncology Research (CREO), University of Perugia, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
Maria Thadani-Mulero
11Roche Products Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom
Oscar Cazares
12Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA
Weize Huang
12Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA
Yanwen Jiang
12Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA
Emma Clark
Hyun Yong Jin
12Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA
Michelle Boyer
12Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA
Franck Morschhauser
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées, Lille, France