FIRST/ENGOT-OV44: A phase 3 clinical trial of dostarlimab (dost) and niraparib (nira) in first-line (1L) advanced ovarian cancer (aOC).
Abstract
LBA5506 Background: The FIRST/ENGOT-OV44 trial evaluated adding dost, a programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitor, to 1L platinum-based chemotherapy (PBCT) and nira maintenance (MT) ± bevacizumab (bev) in patients (pts) with aOC. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial, pts with newly diagnosed stage III–IV, high-grade nonmucinous epithelial OC received 1-cycle run-in of PBCT ± bev and were randomized (1:1:2) to arm 1 (PBCT+placebo [PBO] with PBO MT), arm 2 (PBCT+PBO with nira+PBO MT), or arm 3 (PBCT+dost with dost+nira MT). Stratification factors included intended bev use (yes/no), homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutation status ( BRCA -mutated; BRCA wild-type HRR-positive; BRCA wild-type HRR-negative/not determined), and stage III disease with postoperative residual disease <1 cm (yes/no). After approvals for 1L MT poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, arm 1 enrollment closed, and pts were randomized (1:2) to arms 2 or 3. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1, assessed in arms 2 and 3, and analyzed per randomized treatment. Safety was assessed among pts who received ≥1 dose of study treatment and analyzed per treatment received. The data cutoff was October 31, 2024. Results: Randomization was from 14Nov2018 to 05Jan2021. Efficacy analyses included 1138 randomized pts (arm 2, n=385; arm 3, n=753; stage IV disease at diagnosis, 37.3%; planned interval surgery, 54.6%; inoperable, 9.8%; homologous recombination-deficient [HRd] disease, 39.0%; programmed cell death ligand 1 [PD-L1]–positive tumors, 33.4% [of n=951 with nonmissing PD-L1 status]; median follow-up, 45.9 mo [IQR, 24.2–54.1]). Patient characteristics were balanced between arms. PFS was statistically significantly longer in arm 3 vs arm 2 (median PFS, 20.63 vs 19.19 mo, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73–0.99; P =0.0351). PFS was reported in subgroups with PD-L1–positive tumors (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.61–1.17), HRd tumors (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.72–1.24), and concurrent bev use (yes: HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.68–1.03; no: HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.69–1.08).There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS), a key secondary endpoint, between arms 3 and 2 (median OS, 44.39 vs 45.37 mo, respectively; HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.86–1.19; P =0.9060). The safety population (N=1321; arms 1–3) included 34 pts randomized to arm 1 who, upon unblinding, received arm 2 treatment; 10 randomized pts did not receive study treatment and were excluded from safety analyses. Median duration of exposure was 11.3, 15.2, and 15.2 mo in arms 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Safety results were generally consistent with the known profiles of each agent of the study. Conclusion: Adding dost to 1L PBCT and nira MT ± bev improved PFS in pts with aOC. No OS difference was observed. Clinical trial information: NCT03602859 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard
Eric Pujade-Lauraine
ARCAGY-GINECO, Paris, France
Richard G. Moore
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
François Montestruc
eXYSTAT, Malakoff, France
Andres Redondo
From the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Foundation (C.E.G., E.P.M., N.W., P.R., I.L.W., A.M.B.) and University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine–UPMC Hillman Cancer Center (C.E.G., N.W., P.R., A.M.B.) — both in Pittsburgh; AGO-B and Helios Klinikum Berlin–Buch, Berlin (M.U.), the National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg (A.S.), Evangelische Kliniken Gelsenkirchen, Gelsenkirchen (H.H.F.), Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie–Breast and Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach (C.J.), the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen–EMN, Friedrich–Alexander University Erlangen–Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg (P.W., S.L.), and the Center for Hematology and Oncology Bethanien, Goethe University, Frankfurt (S.L.) — all in Germany; National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine,...
Mansoor Raza Mirza
Rigshospitalet – Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Cancer Treatment, Copenhagen, Denmark
Nataliya Volodko
Department of Oncology and Radiology, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine
Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu
Institutul Oncologic Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă and University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Haţieganu, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Lucy Gilbert
Department of Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal
Ram Eitan
Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Flora Zagouri
Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
Sandro Pignata
Uro-Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS-Fondazione “G. Pascale,” Naples, Italy
Rosalind Glasspool
Jacobus Pfisterer
AGO Study Group, Wiesbaden, Germany & Gynecologic Oncology Center, Kiel, Germany
Rebecca Phaeton
GSK, Collegeville, PA
Charles K. Anderson
Willamette Valley Cancer Institute and Research Center, Eugene, OR
Manuel Rodrigues
Fernanda Musa
Isabelle Laure Ray-Coquard
Centre Léon Bérard, Centre Régional de Lutte Contre Le Cancer de Lyon, Lyon, France
Kathleen N. Moore
Division of Gynecologic Oncology Stephenson Cancer Center University of Oklahoma Oklahoma City Oklahoma USA