First-line romiplostim combined with immunosuppressive therapy for severe aplastic anemia: A prospective, single-arm, Phase II study
Abstract
Abstract Background Incorporating thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) into standard immunosuppressive therapy (IST) has significantly improved both the hematologic response rate and quality of remission in treatment-naïve patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA). Romiplostim N01, a long-acting TPO-RA, has shown promising results in refractory aplastic anemia, achieving an overall hematologic response rate of 84%, with platelet responses in 65% of patients. Approximately 70% of patients experienced some degree of hematologic improvement within 3 months, highlighting its potential for frontline use. We therefore designed a single-arm, phase II clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line romiplostim N01 in combination with intensified IST in patients with severe or very severe aplastic anemia (NCT 06613880). Methods This study employed Simon's optimal two-stage design to estimate the sample size. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) at week 27. Historical ORR for ATG plus cyclosporine is 45%; the expected ORR with the addition of romiplostim N01 is 65%. With a one-sided alpha of 0.05 and 80% power, 43 patients were required. Considering a 10% of drop-out rate, the final sample size is 48. The screening period was up to 4 weeks. Treatment consisted of porcine ATG (pALG) 25 mg/kg/day on days 1-5, continuous cyclosporine 3-5 mg/kg/day, and romiplostim N01 starting at 10 μg/kg/week on day 1, titrated up to 20 μg/kg/week based on platelet count and clinical response (in 5 μg/kg increments). Secondary endpoints included superior response (defined as HGB >80 g/L and PLT >50×10⁹/L), ORR and complete response (CR), time to hematologic response, and incidence of adverse events. Results A total of 48 patients were enrolled: 36 with SAA (75%) and 12 with very severe aplastic anemia (VSAA). One VSAA patient died of bacterial sepsis 3 days after pALG initiation, three patients were lost to follow-up at week 4, week 6 and week 22, respectively. Among the 45 evaluable patients at 3 months, the ORR was 80%, with a CR rate of 24.4% and 66.7% achieving superior responses. Among 34 evaluable SAA patients, 88.2% achieved hematologic response, including 29.4% with CR. In the VSAA subgroup (n=11), 54.5% achieved response and 9.1% achieved CR. At 6 months, 37 patients were evaluable: the ORR was 86.5%, CR rate 40.5%, and 86.4% achieved superior responses. The median time to hematologic response was 7.5 weeks (range: 4–20). Among 26 evaluable SAA patients, 92.3% achieved hematologic response, including 42.3% with CR. In the VSAA subgroup (n=11), 72.7% achieved response and the CR rate increased to 36.4%. Grade≥3 adverse events were reported in 9 patients, including infections (10.4%), allergic reactions (8.3%), liver dysfunction (2.1%), and acute coronary syndrome (2.1%). Conclusions First-line romiplostim N01 combined with intensified IST demonstrates high efficacy, rapid onset of response, and favorable remission quality in patients with SAA/VSAA, supporting its promising therapeutic potential. Keywords: Aplastic anemia, Romiplostim N01, Immunosuppressive therapy, Hematologic response
Article Details
Authors (21)
Lele Zhang
Xiang Ren
Xiangrong Hu
1State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
Jing Zhang
Jianping Li
Youzhen Xiong
1State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
Neng Nie
Blood Diseases Hospital, Tianjin, China
Hong Pan
Yuan Li
XingXin Li
Zhen Gao
State Key Laboratory of Optical Fiber and Cable Manufacturing Technology, Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Integrated Optoelectronics Intellisense, Southern University of Science and Technology
Weiwang Li
Blood Diseases Hospital, Tianjin, China
Jingyu Zhao
Blood Diseases Hospital, Tianjin, China
Jinbo Huang
Blood Diseases Hospital, Tianjin, China
Xin Zhao
Guangxin Peng
1State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
Liwei Fang
Blood Diseases Hospital, Tianjin, China
Li Zhang
Yizhou Zheng
Blood Diseases Hospital, Tianjin, China
Meili Ge
Blood Diseases Hospital, Tianjin, China
Jun Shi