First-line consolidation with cemacabtagene ansegedleucel (cema-cel) in patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) and minimal residual disease (MRD) after response to standard therapy: The pivotal, randomized, open‑label Phase 2 ALPHA3 study

J John M. Burke (4Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Aurora, CO) N Nancy Bartlett (14Department of Hematology and Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine Siteman Cancer Center Hematology Labs, St. Louis, MO) G Gary L. Simmons (2Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States) L Lindsey Fitzgerald (11Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States) J Jeremy Abramson (5Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Department of Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology Division, Boston, United States) A Akil Merchant P Paolo Caimi (1Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland, United States) R Rushang D. Patel (7Stem Cell Transplant and Cellular Therapy, AdventHealth, Orlando, United States) D Don Stevens (3Norton Cancer Institute, Louisville, United States) S Sven de Vos (7Department of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, Ronald Reagan University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA) O Oleg L. Krijanovski (10Alta Bates Summit Medical Center Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berkeley, United States) G Geoffrey Shouse (3Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, Duarte, United States) A Alex Herrera (3Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, Duarte, United States) H Houston Holmes (12Texas Oncology/Baylor Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, United States) M Matthew Matasar (6Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, United States) M Mitul Gandhi (10Virginia Cancer Specialists, US Oncology Research, Gainesville, VA) F Frederick Locke (1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Hematology and Oncology, Tampa, United States) J John Kuruvilla (1Princess Margaret Cancer Centre) A Amy Feng (17Allogene Therapeutics, San Francisco, United States) J Joe Jiang (17Allogene Therapeutics, San Francisco, United States) S Shilpa Shahani (17Allogene Therapeutics, San Francisco, United States) J John B. Le Gall (17Allogene Therapeutics, San Francisco, United States) Z Zachary J. Roberts J Jason Westin (3Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX)

Abstract

Abstract Background and Significance: R-CHOP as first-line (1L) therapy for LBCL has a cure rate of ~60%. However, ~10% of patients (pts) have refractory LBCL (Coiffier B et al, NEJM 2002) and ~30% of responders relapse within 2 years (Padala SA & Kallam A, In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2023). Autologous CAR T-cell therapies have been revolutionary in the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) LBCL and they are considered standard second-line treatment but might not be an option due to aggressive disease, pt comorbidity, access barriers, or manufacturing issues/delays. Identifying responders to 1L therapy who are at high risk of relapse and rapidly administering an off-the-shelf CAR T-cell therapy for remission consolidation may improve outcomes. Presence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)–based MRD, measured by an ultrasensitive MRD test at the end of 1L therapy, is highly prognostic for relapse. Cema-cel is an immediately available, off-the-shelf, HLA-unmatched allogeneic CD19 CAR T-cell product that utilizes Cellectis technologies has shown potent antitumor activity and manageable safety in phase 1 studies of pts with R/R LBCL and is a promising agent for consolidation in this treatment setting. The pivotal, randomized, open-label, phase 2 ALPHA3 study (NCT06500273) was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of consolidation with cema-cel compared with standard-of-care (SOC) observation in pts with LBCL who are in response after 1L immunochemotherapy but have detectable MRD by ctDNA-based testing. We report the updated study design.Study Design and Methods: Adults with histologically confirmed diffuse LBCL (DLBCL; includes DLBCL not otherwise specified, Epstein-Barr virus–positive DLBCL, DLBCL with IRF4/MUM1 rearrangement), high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL; includes HGBCL not otherwise specified, or with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements), or primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma per WHO 2017 classification and ≥1 of the following clinical criteria at diagnosis—International Prognostic Index score of 2-5; Ann Arbor stage III/IV disease; and history of equivocal response at interim or end-of-therapy positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)—will be prescreened. Eligible pts must have completed a full course of standard 1L therapy that included an anthracycline and an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody; achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) suitable for observation at the end of 1L therapy per PET/CT evaluation by Lugano 2014 criteria and without evidence of progression by randomization; MRD positivity per ctDNA-based testing; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1; and adequate organ function. The study consists of a 2-part seamless design. In Part A, pts will be randomly assigned 1:1 to SOC observation or to cema-cel (120×106 CAR T cells) after a 3-day LD with fludarabine (30 mg/m2/day) and cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2/day) (FC). Second cema-cel arm that utilized 3-day LD with FC plus the anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody ALLO-647 (30 mg/day) was closed in August 2025 because of a grade 5 hepatic failure event caused by a disseminated adenovirus infection that was attributed to ALLO-647. Part A will conclude with interim safety and surrogate biomarker–based efficacy analyses. In Part B, pts will continue to be randomly assigned 1:1 to cema-cel after FC or SOC observation. Randomization in Parts A and B will be stratified by best response to 1L therapy (CR vs PR). The primary endpoint is event-free survival per Lugano 2014 criteria by independent review committee (IRC), with hierarchical testing of key secondary end points of progression-free survival per Lugano 2014 criteria by IRC and overall survival. Other secondary end points include rate of MRD clearance and safety of cema-cel. Enrollment in Part A is ongoing. Pts randomly assigned to the treatment arm or followed up in observation during Part A will be included in the inferential testing in Part B. Approximately 110 pts will be enrolled in each arm across academic- and community-based centers. The study was initiated in June 2024.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 3730-3730
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (24)

J

John M. Burke

4Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Aurora, CO

N

Nancy Bartlett

14Department of Hematology and Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine Siteman Cancer Center Hematology Labs, St. Louis, MO

G

Gary L. Simmons

2Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States

L

Lindsey Fitzgerald

11Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States

J

Jeremy Abramson

5Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Department of Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology Division, Boston, United States

A

Akil Merchant

P

Paolo Caimi

1Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland, United States

R

Rushang D. Patel

7Stem Cell Transplant and Cellular Therapy, AdventHealth, Orlando, United States

D

Don Stevens

3Norton Cancer Institute, Louisville, United States

S

Sven de Vos

7Department of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, Ronald Reagan University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

O

Oleg L. Krijanovski

10Alta Bates Summit Medical Center Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berkeley, United States

G

Geoffrey Shouse

3Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, Duarte, United States

A

Alex Herrera

3Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, Duarte, United States

H

Houston Holmes

12Texas Oncology/Baylor Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, United States

M

Matthew Matasar

6Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, United States

M

Mitul Gandhi

10Virginia Cancer Specialists, US Oncology Research, Gainesville, VA

F

Frederick Locke

1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Hematology and Oncology, Tampa, United States

J

John Kuruvilla

1Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

A

Amy Feng

17Allogene Therapeutics, San Francisco, United States

J

Joe Jiang

17Allogene Therapeutics, San Francisco, United States

S

Shilpa Shahani

17Allogene Therapeutics, San Francisco, United States

J

John B. Le Gall

17Allogene Therapeutics, San Francisco, United States

Z

Zachary J. Roberts

J

Jason Westin

3Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX