First-line (1L) olomorasib + pembrolizumab in patients with <i>KRAS</i> G12C–mutant advanced NSCLC, and PD-L1 expression 0-49%, from the dose optimization cohorts of LOXO-RAS-20001 and SUNRAY-01.

B Bryan Anthony Chan (Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, Birtinya, Australia) S Solange Peters L Luis Leon (Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago, Spain) T Tadaaki Yamada N Neeharika Srivastava Makani (Comprehensive Hematology-Oncology, St. Petersburg, FL) W Wen-Tsung Huang (Chi Mei Chest Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan) D Dionisios Spyratos (Pulmonary Department, Lung Cancer Oncology Unit, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki,G. Papanicolaou Hospital, Thessalonoki, Ireland) J Jaromir Roubec (Hospital AGEL Ostrava – Vitkovice, Ostrava, Czech Republic) N Niels Reinmuth (Thoracic Oncology, Asklepios Clinics Munich-Gauting, Gauting, Germany) A Adrian G. Sacher A Alexander I. Spira (Virginia Cancer Specialists and NEXT Oncology-Virginia, Fairfax) N Nimit Singhal S Shinji Takeuchi (Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan) Y Yonina R. Murciano-Goroff Y Yanhong Zhou A Aaron Alan Fink (Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN) A Alyson Merced (Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN) M Melinda D. Willard C Carla M. Visseren Grul (Eli Lilly and Company, Utrecht, Netherlands) M Melissa Lynne Johnson (Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN)

Abstract

8628 Background: For patients (pts) with 1L KRAS G12C-mutant advanced NSCLC and PD-L1 expression &lt;50%, the current SOC is pembrolizumab + platinum-based chemotherapy. Combining olomorasib, a KRAS G12C inhibitor, with pembrolizumab may overcome the limited efficacy of single-agent pembrolizumab in this population, while offering a chemotherapy-sparing targeted approach. Here we report an integrated analysis of 1L pts with PD-L1 expression 0-49% (&lt;1% and 1-49%) who received olomorasib + pembrolizumab from the dose optimization cohorts of LOXO-RAS-20001 and SUNRAY-01. Methods: Pts with advanced KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC, known PD-L1 expression and ECOG PS 0-1 were randomized to olomorasib (50 or 100 mg, orally BID) with pembrolizumab (200 mg Q3W). One cycle of SOC pembrolizumab prior to enrollment was permitted. Objective response rate (ORR) was assessed in the efficacy evaluable population, with PD-L1 0-49% Other efficacy endpoints included best overall response (BOR) and disease control rate (DCR). Safety was assessed across all treated pts (PD-L1 0-100%). Results: As of 6 June 2025, 85 pts received olomorasib + pembrolizumab, of which 31 pts had tumors with PD-L1 expression 0-49% (&lt;1%: n=13; 1-49%: n=18). In pts with PD-L1 expression &lt;1%, no pts received a prior cycle of SOC, 23% of pts had baseline brain metastases, and 38% had an ECOG score of 1. For the pts with PD-L1 expression of 1-49%, 17% received 1 prior cycle of SOC, 17% had baseline brain metastases, and 56% had an ECOG score of 1. The ORR was 58% in pts with PD-L1 &lt;1%, 67% in pts with PD-L1 1-49% (Table). Across all treated pts the most common any grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were diarrhea (31%) and ALT/AST increased (26/24%). TRAEs led to permanent discontinuation of study treatment in 12% of pts (n=10). Conclusions: Olomorasib + pembrolizumab demonstrated promising efficacy in pts with 1L KRAS G12C-mutant advanced NSCLC, and PD-L1 expression &lt;1% and 1-49% with ORRs that compare favorably with historical outcomes for pembrolizumab and chemo-immunotherapy in unselected advanced NSCLC. Olomorasib + pembrolizumab is under evaluation in pts with 1L KRAS G12C-mutant metastatic NSCLC (SUNRAY-01, NCT06119581) and early-stage NSCLC (SUNRAY-02, NCT06890598). Clinical trial information: NCT04956640 , NCT06119581 . Response and time-to-event endpoints in the Efficacy evaluable population with PD-L1 0-49% (N=30*). Endpoint Pts with PD-L1 &lt;1%n=12 Pts with PD-L1 1-49%n=18 ORR † , % (n/N) 58.3 (7/12) 66.7 (12/18) BOR, n (%) CR † 1 (8.3) 1 (5.6) PR † 6 (50.0) 11 (61.1) SD 4 (33.3) 4 (22.2) PD 1 (8.3) 1 (5.6) NE 0 (0.0) 1 (5.6) DCR, % (n/N) 91.7 (11/12) 88.9 (16/18) † Includes responses confirmed and pending. *Data for 1 patient are not shown in the table due to incomplete target lesion assessment. CR, confirmed response; NE, not evaluable, PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 8628-8628
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

B

Bryan Anthony Chan

Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, Birtinya, Australia

S

Solange Peters

L

Luis Leon

Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago, Spain

T

Tadaaki Yamada

N

Neeharika Srivastava Makani

Comprehensive Hematology-Oncology, St. Petersburg, FL

W

Wen-Tsung Huang

Chi Mei Chest Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan

D

Dionisios Spyratos

Pulmonary Department, Lung Cancer Oncology Unit, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki,G. Papanicolaou Hospital, Thessalonoki, Ireland

J

Jaromir Roubec

Hospital AGEL Ostrava – Vitkovice, Ostrava, Czech Republic

N

Niels Reinmuth

Thoracic Oncology, Asklepios Clinics Munich-Gauting, Gauting, Germany

A

Adrian G. Sacher

A

Alexander I. Spira

Virginia Cancer Specialists and NEXT Oncology-Virginia, Fairfax

N

Nimit Singhal

S

Shinji Takeuchi

Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan

Y

Yonina R. Murciano-Goroff

Y

Yanhong Zhou

A

Aaron Alan Fink

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN

A

Alyson Merced

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN

M

Melinda D. Willard

C

Carla M. Visseren Grul

Eli Lilly and Company, Utrecht, Netherlands

M

Melissa Lynne Johnson

Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN