Firicabtagene autoleucel (firi-cel), a CD22-directed CAR T-cell therapy, for patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma: Results from the phase 2 study (FIRCE-1 Trial)
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Based on efficacy of CD22-targeted CAR T-cells in a phase I trial in adults with relapsed/refractory (r/r) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL)—including in those with relapse following CD19 CAR T-cells (CAR19) (Frank M, et al. Lancet 2024), firicabtagene autoleucel (firi-cel/CRG-022), an autologous CD22-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy was tested in a Phase 2 study. Methods: The primary objective of this phase 2, open-label multicenter study was to evaluate efficacy of firi-cel in adults with r/r LBCL who progressed after CAR19 (cohort 1). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) as determined by blinded central review using Lugano Response Criteria. Cohort 2 was for those with a non-conforming product; cohort 3 was for those who received prior CAR19 and bispecific T-cell engagers. In contrast to the phase I study, CD22 expression was not required. Secondary objectives were to evaluate toxicity and additional efficacy endpoints, including ORR, complete response (CR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) as determined by individual investigators. Firi-cel was centrally manufactured using the Miltenyi Prodigy and utilized a different, more rapid in-culture timeline (5-9 days) compared to the phase I trial (7-12 days). Enrollment started Aug 2023 and data cut-off was 4/8/2025. Results: 138 patients underwent screening and 101 proceeded to leukapheresis (37 screen failures). 93 products were manufactured and 84 patients were infused. 15 patients dropped out due to manufacturing failures (7), disease progression (3), PI decision (4), or other (1). The median vein-to-vein time was 35 days (range, 24-86 days). For those infused, the median age was 65.5 years (19-87 years), 56 (67%) were male, 6 (7%) were non-white and 12 (14%) were Hispanic. The median number of prior lines of therapy was 3 (2-8) and the median time from prior CAR19 to apheresis was 7.4 months (1.6-66 months). 12 (14%) had bulky disease and 46 (55%) had elevated LDH. The median H-score for tumor CD22 expression was 65 (range 0-300). Among 52 patients with an available sample, 10 had undetectable CD22. At data cut-off (median follow-up of 4.8 months) and using investigator-determined responses (as central review was not available after trial closure), for cohort 1 (n=69), the ORR and CR rates were 73% (95% CI, 60-83%) and 46% (34-59%), respectively. The median DOR was 2.4 months (95% CI, 2.0-5.1). The median PFS and OS were 3.1 months (2.6-4.9) and 12.4 months (7.4-non-estimable (NE)). Results for cohort 2 (n=3) were comparable and will be reported later. For cohort 3 (n=12), the ORR and CR rates were 50.0% (21-79%) and 25% (6-57%) respectively. The median DOR was 2.2 months (1.1-NE), while the median PFS and OS were 2.8 months (0.9-3.4) and 5.9 months (2.8-NE), respectively. Any and grade 3+ CRS occurred in 66 (79%) and 4 (5%) patients. 8 (10%) had any grade ICANS with no Gr3+ seen. Immune effector cell associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (IEC-HS) occurred in 21 (25%) subjects and was grade 3+ in 11 (13%). 5 (6%) had a fatal treatment-emergent adverse event, all related to IEC-HS or complications thereof. Firi-cel harvested after 5 (n=23), 7 (n=31), or 9 (n=15) days associated with 3-month CR rates of 32%, 15%, and 7%, respectively, and circulating firi-cel detectable in the peripheral blood in 91%, 58%, and 0% of patients at 3 months, respectively. Interestingly, day 5 products were enriched with central memory T-cells; while day 9 products were enriched with effector memory T-cells. CD22 tumor expression did not correlate with ORR or IEC-HS incidence or severity. Longer follow up is needed to determine whether CD22 tumor expression significantly correlates with DOR/PFS; so far patients with undetectable CD22 tumor expression trended toward shorter DOR/PFS. The trial was terminated due to limited durable responses and higher than anticipated toxicity.Conclusions: Firi-cel demonstrated high ORR in patients with r/r LBCL after prior CAR19. However, DOR was low likely due to altered manufacturing protocols and enrollment of patients with undetectable CD22 disease. Altered manufacturing may also have contributed to higher incidence and severity of IEC-HS. Further exploration of firi-cel pharmacokinetics and biology in relationship to toxicity will be essential to better understand the continued potential of CD22-targeting in LBCL.
Article Details
Authors (38)
Matthew Frank
2Stanford University School of Medicine, Medicine, Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Stanford, United States
David Qualls
1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Medical Oncology, Boston, United States
Armin Ghobadi
5Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
Jordan Gauthier
Michael Tees
5Colorado Blood Cancer Institute, Denver, United States
Luke Mountjoy
28Sarah Cannon Transplant and Cellular Therapy Program at Colorado Blood Cancer Institute, Denver, United States
Joseph McGuirk
2The Mikael Rayaan Foundation Global Research Training Institute (MRF GRTI), Kansas City, United States
Sattva Neelapu
4The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, Houston, United States
Reem Karmali
2Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medicine, Chicago, United States
Iris Isufi
Brian Hill
1Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland, United States
Craig Sauter
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Department of Medicine, New York, United States
Catherine Diefenbach
4Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone Health, New York, United States
Jay Spiegel
4University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, United States
Lizamarie Bachier-Rodriguez
1Northside Hospital Cancer Institute, BMT, Leukemia and Immunotherapy Programs, Atlanta, United States
Monalisa Ghosh
Nirav Shah
7MCW Cancer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States
Rahul Lakhotia
16National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
Francisco Hernandez-Ilizaliturri
21Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, United States
Anuja Abhyankar
17Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, United States
Elise Chong
17Lymphoma Program, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
Matthew Schwede
5Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, United States
Krish Patel
C. U. Shah Medical College, Surendranagar, India
Olalekan Oluwole
1Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Hematology/Oncology, Nashville, United States
John Baird
1City of Hope, Hematology and HCT, Duarte, United States
Nathan Denlinger
1The Ohio State University Medical Center, Hematology, Columbus, United States
Farrukh Awan
3Department of Hematology/Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX
Michael Jain
1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Hematology and Oncology, Tampa, United States
John Timmerman
25University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
Cesar Sanchez
26University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, United States
Muthu Kumaran
33University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, United States
Jean Yared
1University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, United States
Jon Arnason
11Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, United States
Ishan Tatake
28BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER, Cambridge, United States
Usama Gergis
Thomas Jefferson University, philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Peter Riedell
3University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
Keith Pratz
12Johns Hopkins University/ Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, United States
Nirali Shah
32National Cancer Institute, Pediatric Oncology Branch, Bethesda, United States