Financial toxicity and employment outcomes in people with melanoma receiving adjuvant therapies.
Abstract
9577 Background: One year ofadjuvant anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (anti-PD1) or dabrafenib-trametinib are standards of care for patients (pts) with resected stage III-IV melanoma. The impact of adjuvant therapy on a pt’s employment, income, and level of financial toxicity are unknown. We examined these outcomes up to 2 years post initiation of adjuvant therapy. Methods: A prospective, longitudinal study of pts with resected stage IIB-IV melanoma receiving adjuvant anti-PD1 or dabrafenib-trametinib at an Australian comprehensive cancer center. Two customized employment surveys assessed impact on employment and income. Survey 1 (7 items) was administered pre-treatment, Survey 2 (11 items) at 12 and 24 months post treatment initiation. The Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (FACIT-COST) was collected pre-treatment and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post treatment initiation. FACIT-COST scores were categorized into none (≥26), mild (14-25), moderate (1-13) and severe (0) financial toxicity. Results: Between September 2021-December 2024, 70 pts were eligible and 52 (74%) consented: 17 (33%) female, median age 64 years (IQR 60-71), 46 (89%) had resected stage III, 32 (62%) on adjuvant anti-PD1. 41 pts had completed treatment and 11 were still receiving treatment at data cut off (17 December 2024). Employment surveys were completed by 51 pts pre-treatment, 31 at 12 months and 18 at 24 months. Most (18/31, 58%) were working at 12 months, with the majority (17/18, 94%) in the same job as pre-treatment. Only half (9, 50%) were working the same number of hours or earning the same income (10, 56%) as pre-treatment (the remainder, less). Barriers to returning to work at 12 months were ongoing symptoms (45%), financial concerns (26%), and work environment (21%). 18 pts completed both the 12 and 24 month surveys. 9 (50%) had returned to work by 12 months and the majority (n=8) were still working at 24 months. At 24 months, 6 (75%) were working the same number of hours but only 5 (63%) were earning the same income as pre-treatment (the remainder, less). The prevalence of financial toxicity is shown in the table and ranged from 16% at 6 months to 36% at 12 months. Conclusions: Half of pts reported reduced working hours and income 12 months post therapy initiation, mostly due to ongoing symptoms. A third reported financial toxicity at 12 months, even with universal healthcare. This data can inform shared decision-making about risks and benefits of adjuvant therapy and highlights the importance of screening for financial toxicity to identify pts who require support. FACIT-COST category Pre-treatment (n= 51) 1 month (n=46) 3 months (n=44) 6 months (n=38) 12 months (n=31) 24 months (n=18) None 37 (72.5) 32 (69.6) 35 (79.5) 32 (84.2) 20 (64.5) 13 (72.2) Mild 13 (25.5) 11 (23.9) 6 (13.6) 5 (13.2) 10 (32.3) 2 (11.1) Moderate 1 (2.0) 2 (4.3) 3 (6.8) 1 (2.6) 1 (3.2) 3 (16.7) Severe 0 1 (2.2) 0 0 0 0 Any 14 (27.5) 14 (30.4) 9 (20.5) 6 (15.8) 11 (35.5) 5 (27.8)
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (12)
Julia Elizabeth Lai-Kwon
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Michael Jefford
Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Centre for Health Services Research in Cancer, and Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Ashkan Mehrnejad
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
Mustafa Abdi Mohamed
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
Kortnye Maureen Smith
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Lavinia Anne Spain
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
Aparna Dodla Rao
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Belinda Lee
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
George Au-Yeung
Allison Drosdowsky
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
Karla Gough
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
Shahneen Sandhu
From the Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center (J.D.W.) and the Department of Medicine (J.D.W., M.A.P.), Weill Cornell Medicine, and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (M.A.P.) — both in New York; Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua (V.C.-S.), European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (P.Q.), Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, IRCCS, Meldola (M.G.), University of Siena and the Center for Immuno-Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena (M.M.), and Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples (P.A.A.) — all in Italy; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland (P.R.); Texas Oncology–Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas (C.L.C.); University Hospital Essen, the German Cancer Consortium, the National Center for Tumor Diseases–West, the Research Alliance Ruhr, Research Center One Health, and University Duisburg-Essen — all in Essen, Germany (D.S.); the College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea (J.W.), Brist...