Financial toxicity and care access barriers among adolescent and young adult versus older melanoma survivors: A population-based analysis of 2021-2024 National Health Interview Survey data.

V Vanshika Singh J Jay Tewari P Priyam Nayak (King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India) N Nikhil Verma (University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR) A Ajoy Tewari (Hind Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India) V Vineeta Tewari (Era's Lucknow Medical College & Hospital, Lucknow, India) S Shailendra Kumar Singh (Endocrine Clinic, Varanasi, India) P Pranav Tewari (Maharani Laxmi Bai Medical College, Jhansi, India)

Abstract

e21592 Background: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors may experience disproportionate financial toxicity and barriers to care as compared to older cancer survivors. Contemporary national estimates in melanoma survivorship are limited. We aimed to estimate financial toxicity and care barriers among AYA and older melanoma survivors. Methods: We pooled National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) 2021–2024 data and identified adults with a history of melanoma and known age at the time of melanoma diagnosis. Survivors were classified as AYA diagnosis (15–39 years) or older diagnosis (≥40 years). Outcomes included delayed medical care due to cost, inability to afford needed medical care, no usual place for medical care, worry about medical bills (very/somewhat vs not at all), and cost-related medication nonadherence (CRN; delayed filling, taking less, or skipping doses) among those reporting prescription use in the past year. We estimated survey-weighted prevalences and fit parsimonious survey-weighted log-link models to obtain adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) for older vs AYA diagnosis, adjusting for sex, insurance (Private/Public/Other), poverty (< 200% vs ≥200% Federal Poverty Level ), and survey year. Results: The analytic sample included 755 melanoma survivors (unweighted): AYA n = 124 and older n = 631. Prescription use was common (n = 688 unweighted). Weighted prevalence was higher in AYA vs older survivors for CRN among prescription users (7.5% vs 4.3%), delayed care due to cost (4.5% vs 3.8%), inability to afford needed care (5.3% vs 3.6%), no usual place for care (3.2% vs 1.4%), and worry about medical bills (33.8% vs 30.5%). In adjusted models, older vs AYA diagnosis was associated with lower prevalence for CRN (aPR 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25–1.80) and no usual place for care (aPR 0.38, 95% CI 0.07–2.07), though the estimates were uncertain. Adjusted differences were similarly uncertain for delayed care due to cost (aPR 1.44, 95% CI 0.52–3.97), inability to afford needed care (aPR 0.98, 95% CI 0.33–2.92), and worry about medical bills (aPR 1.16, 95% CI 0.83–1.63). Conclusions: AYA-diagnosis melanoma survivors demonstrated consistently higher national point estimates of financial and access barriers compared with older-diagnosis survivors. Although adjusted comparisons were imprecise, these findings support targeted survivorship interventions addressing medication affordability and care navigation for AYA melanoma survivors.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (8)

V

Vanshika Singh

J

Jay Tewari

P

Priyam Nayak

King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India

N

Nikhil Verma

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR

A

Ajoy Tewari

Hind Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India

V

Vineeta Tewari

Era's Lucknow Medical College & Hospital, Lucknow, India

S

Shailendra Kumar Singh

Endocrine Clinic, Varanasi, India

P

Pranav Tewari

Maharani Laxmi Bai Medical College, Jhansi, India