Final results of a phase II study of fruquintinib plus sintilimab as a second-line therapy for advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC).

M Min Jin (Division of Psychology, State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, International Data Group/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University) S Shengli Yang (Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China) J Junli Liu (Engineering Research Center of Advanced Rare Earth Materials, Department of Chemistry) J Jieying Zhang (Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China) L Lei Zhao (School of Life Sciences, Key Laboratory of Pesticide and Chemical Biology of Ministry of Education, and Hubei Key Laboratory of Genetic Regulation and Integrative Biology, Central China Normal University) D Dandan Yu Z Zhenyu Lin P Pindong Li (Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China) J Jing Wang (Hunan Cancer Hospital Changsha China) J Jun Xue H Hong Ma J Jianli Hu (Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China) T Tao Zhang H Hongli Liu

Abstract

395 Background: Second-line treatment options for advanced gastric cancer remain limited. This open-label, single-arm phase II study (NCT05625737) aimed to identify the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib (VEGFR-1, -2, -3 inhibitor) plus sintilimab (anti-PD-1) as second-line therapy in GC/GEJC. Here we report the final results with a focus on subgroup analyses. Methods: Patients (pts) aged 18-75 years who were HER2-negative and had failed first-line standard treatment were enrolled. Eligible pts received 4mg of fruquintinib orally once daily on days 1-14 and 200 mg of sintilimab intravenously on day 1, with treatment repeated every 3 weeks. An optimal Simon two-stage design was employed. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: At data cut-off (April 10, 2025), 29 pts (7 in the first stage; 22 in the second stage) were enrolled. 69% had lymph node metastasis and 72.4% had previously received immunotherapy. Of the 24 pts evaluable for tumor response, the ORR was 37.5% with 9 pts achieving partial responses and DCR was 66.7%. At the final analysis with a median follow-up of 29.5 months, the median PFS was 5.1 months and the median OS was 12.7 months. Pts with lymph node metastasis were more likely to achieve higher response rate (52.9 vs 0%) and longer PFS than those without lymph node metastasis (5.1 vs 2.6 mon, P=0.1003). The median OS of pts with lymph node metastasis was significantly longer than that of pts without lymph node metastasis (14.9 vs 8.2 mon, P=0.0388). Similar trends were observed in pts without prior immunotherapies and with prior immunotherapies (ORR: 50 vs 31.3%; PFS: 6.2 vs 5.1 mon, P=0.515; OS: 25.1 vs 9.4 mon, P=0.0808). Only 4% (1 patient) patients experienced grade 3 or higher adverse events, including grade 3 elevations in alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and grade 4 bilirubin elevation. No serious treatment-related adverse events or treatment-related deaths were reported. Conclusions: Fruquintinib combined with sintilimab provided favorable efficacy and manageable toxicity profile as second-line therapy for pts with advanced GC/GEJC, especially in pts with lymph node metastasis or without prior immunotherapies. Further studies in larger cohorts to validate these findings are warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT05625737 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 2_suppl
Published January 10, 2026
Pages 395-395
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (14)

M

Min Jin

Division of Psychology, State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, International Data Group/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University

S

Shengli Yang

Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

J

Junli Liu

Engineering Research Center of Advanced Rare Earth Materials, Department of Chemistry

J

Jieying Zhang

Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

L

Lei Zhao

School of Life Sciences, Key Laboratory of Pesticide and Chemical Biology of Ministry of Education, and Hubei Key Laboratory of Genetic Regulation and Integrative Biology, Central China Normal University

D

Dandan Yu

Z

Zhenyu Lin

P

Pindong Li

Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

J

Jing Wang

Hunan Cancer Hospital Changsha China

J

Jun Xue

H

Hong Ma

J

Jianli Hu

Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

T

Tao Zhang

H

Hongli Liu