Final results of a multi-center phase 2 trial of isatuximab-lenalidomide in patients with high risk smoldering multiple myeloma (HRSMM)

S Sheeba Thomas (1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, Houston, United States) E Elisabet Manasanch (1University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Lymphoma & Myeloma, Houston, United States) S Sundar Jagannath (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York) N Neha Korde (1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Myeloma Service, Department of Medicine, New York, United States) H Hans Lee (3Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, United States) D David Berrios (1University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Lymphoma & Myeloma, Houston, United States) K Krina Patel (4The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States) S Swami Iyer (15MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States) S Sham Mailankody (Cellular Therapy Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York) B Behrang Amini P Pei Lin Z Zuzana Berkova D Donna Weber (1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, Houston, United States) G Gregory Kaufman (1University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Lymphoma & Myeloma, Houston, United States) L Lei Feng M Michelle Hildebrandt (UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States) L Linghua Wang S Sattva Neelapu (4The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, Houston, United States) R Robert Orlowski (University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston) O Ola Landgren

Abstract

Abstract Background: In analyses conducted by the Spanish Myeloma Group, Mayo Clinic and International Myeloma Working Group, patients with HRSMM have a median time to progression to symptomatic disease of <2 years. Randomized trials of lenalidomide (LEN) +/- dexamethasone vs. observation (E3A06, QuiReDex), carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRd) with transplant, consolidation, and maintenance (GEM-CESAR), and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies alone (CENTAURUS) or with KRd (ASCENT), have all shown efficacy in terms of response and progression free survival (PFS) in such patients; some have also reported improved overall survival (OS). In this multi-center phase II trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of combining isatuximab and LEN (ISA-LEN) in HRSMM patients (NCT04270409).  Methods: Patients were treated on 28-day cycles with ISA 20 mg/kg IV on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycle (C) 1, days 1 and 15 of C2-6, and day 1 of C7-30, together with LEN 25 mg PO on days 1-21 of cycles 1-6; methylprednisolone 100mg iv was given prior to each ISA infusion. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) after C6 (Manasanch et al. ASCO 2023). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), defined as time from enrollment to development of symptomatic multiple myeloma, ORR after completion of 18 and 30 cycles, and OS. HRSMM was defined per Programa Español de Tratamientos en Hematología (PETHEMA) risk stratification (immunoparesis and ≥95% aberrant bone marrow plasma cells as measured by multiparametric flow cytometry). We here report final efficacy and safety outcomes at completion of 30 cycles. Results: Between 9/2020 and 10/2022, 36 patients were enrolled. The median age was 67 years, 57% were women, and 12% were of Black or Hispanic ancestry. One patient was belatedly determined to be ineligible by high-risk bone marrow flow cytometry criteria. All others had HRSMM by PETHEMA criteria. Prior to completing C30, 4 patients came off-study: 2 had progressive disease after C6 and C29 respectively, 1 (in partial response (PR)) withdrew consent after completing C14, and 1 (in complete response (CR)) was diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma after C21. At completion of 6 cycles (n = 35), ORR was 86% % [23% very good partial response (VGPR), 63% PR]. This improved to 94% by the end of 18 cycles (n = 34; 9% CR, 35% VGPR, 50% PR) with improved depth of response in 12 of 34 patients (34%) between cycles 6 and 18. Among patients (n= 31) completing all 30 cycles, the ORR was 97% [10% stringent CR, 3% CR, 35% VGPR, 48% PR]. Response quality improved in 5 of 31 patients (16%) between cycles 18 and 30. With a median follow up of 37.8 months, the 4-year PFS was 94.3% (CI: 86.9%-100%). Median PFS has not been reached, and no patients have died. Best ORR at any time on study (n = 35) was 94% [stringent CR 11%, CR 6%, VGPR 29% and PR 49%]. Data from all 36 patients were included in the safety analysis. The most frequent (≥20%) hematologic grade ≤2 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were leukocytopenia (69%), lymphopenia (58%), anemia (56%), thrombocytopenia (39%), and neutropenia (36%), while common non-hematologic TRAEs were fatigue (58%), diarrhea (53%), constipation (39%), maculo-papular rash (31%), nausea (28%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (22%). The most frequent (³5%) hematologic Grade 3 TRAEs were: neutropenia (42%), leukopenia (14%), lymphopenia (14%), and thrombocytopenia (6%); non-hematologic grade 3 TRAEs were maculopapular rash (8%) and fatigue (6%). Only 1 patient had a grade 4 TRAE (neutropenia). No grade 5 TRAEs occurred on study. As above, 1 patient discontinued therapy due to a new diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Conclusions: ISA-LEN is a well-tolerated therapy for high risk smoldering multiple myeloma, with a 4-year PFS of 94.3%. The final results of this phase 2 trial compare favorably with the natural history of PETHEMA HRSMM patients (Perez-Persona et al. Blood 2007), while limiting both steroid and LEN use. They support the ongoing phase 3 ITHACA trial which is evaluating ISA ± LEN-DEX and has the potential to change the standard of care in HRSMM.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 5834-5834
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (20)

S

Sheeba Thomas

1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, Houston, United States

E

Elisabet Manasanch

1University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Lymphoma & Myeloma, Houston, United States

S

Sundar Jagannath

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York

N

Neha Korde

1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Myeloma Service, Department of Medicine, New York, United States

H

Hans Lee

3Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, United States

D

David Berrios

1University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Lymphoma & Myeloma, Houston, United States

K

Krina Patel

4The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States

S

Swami Iyer

15MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States

S

Sham Mailankody

Cellular Therapy Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York

B

Behrang Amini

P

Pei Lin

Z

Zuzana Berkova

D

Donna Weber

1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, Houston, United States

G

Gregory Kaufman

1University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Lymphoma & Myeloma, Houston, United States

L

Lei Feng

M

Michelle Hildebrandt

UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States

L

Linghua Wang

S

Sattva Neelapu

4The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, Houston, United States

R

Robert Orlowski

University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston

O

Ola Landgren